New Yorker 12小时前
The Texas Democrats’ Remote Resistance
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

面对德州州长企图通过不当手段重新划分国会选区以谋取党派利益,包括Mihaela Plesa在内的五十余名德州民主党议员选择集体出走,以“缺席投票”的方式阻止该计划的通过。此举不仅是对德州政治现状的直接挑战,更是对美国民主基石的有力捍卫。议员们在州外奔走呼吁,通过媒体发声,揭露“权力攫取”行为,并将其上升到捍卫民主原则的高度。尽管面临法律诉讼、炸弹威胁等压力,他们仍坚持通过媒体宣传、策略会议和与各州领导人沟通,争取更广泛的社会支持,以期阻止不公正的政治操弄,维护民主的公平与正义。

🗳️ 德州民主党议员集体出走以阻止不公平的选区划分:为应对州长Greg Abbott提出的、旨在扩大共和党国会席位优势的激进选区划分计划,超过五十名德州民主党议员选择集体离开德州,通过制造法定人数不足来阻止该计划的实施。这一策略旨在迫使州长收回成命,维护政治公平。议员Mihaela Plesa最初对此策略有所犹豫,但最终选择与同事一同行动,认为这是捍卫民主的必要之举,尽管这会带来“麻烦”。

📢 议员们在州外发声,将德州事件上升到民主原则的高度:离开德州的议员们在芝加哥、萨克拉门托等地召开记者会,向公众和媒体揭露Abbott的“权力攫取”行为,并强调其受唐纳德·特朗普的指使。他们将此举定性为对民主制度的威胁,认为“我们不再走向威权主义,我们就在那里”。议员们通过媒体宣传,呼吁全美关注并支持他们,以阻止这种可能损害民主根基的行为。

⚖️ 议员们面临的挑战与坚持:在集体出走期间,德州民主党议员们面临着来自德州总检察长的法律诉讼,试图宣布其议席空缺,甚至有FBI介入搜寻的传言。他们还经历了炸弹威胁等恐吓。尽管如此,议员们依然在州外积极工作,包括进行媒体采访、与幕僚进行远程会议、与律师沟通,并与各州民主党领导人会面寻求支持。他们认为,即使报酬微薄且远离家乡,也必须为选民发声,揭示德州政府优先处理选区划分而非民生问题的荒谬。

🏛️ 借鉴历史经验与家族精神的激励:Mihaela Plesa在出走时携带了一枚祖母留下的罗马尼亚金币,象征着祖母当年为逃离集权统治而移民的精神。她认为Abbott和特朗普的举动与她童年时听到的故事相似,祖母“从不为世界使自己变得渺小或软弱”的教诲也激励着她坚持斗争。同时,议员们也引用了“他们先来抓XX,我没有说话”的典故,来警示对政治不公姑息养奸的危险,并以北卡罗来纳州的选区划分作为反面教材,说明这种操纵可能带来的严重后果。

🤝 跨州合作与国内政治的联动:德州民主党议员的出走行动得到了其他民主党州政府的支持,例如加州州长Gavin Newsom积极协调,与德州议员会面,并计划在加州推动新的选区划分以增加民主党席位。这种跨州的合作显示出,德州议员的抗争已成为全国范围内民主党与共和党在政治权力争夺中的一个缩影。他们通过展示加州的行动,来证明这场斗争已超越德州,成为全国性的民主保卫战。

When it came time for Mihaela Plesa, the vice-chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, to decide whether to flee the state with dozens of her fellow Democratic legislators, earlier this month, she felt torn. On the one hand, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, had proposed a radical plan to redraw the state’s congressional maps to favor Republicans. By leaving the state, Plesa and her colleagues could deprive the Texas House of the two-thirds quorum required to approve the maneuver. On the other hand, Plesa wondered how she would explain a step that could undercut the appeals to bipartisanship that had helped her win election in a politically divided district anchored in Plano, a Dallas suburb. She also was skeptical that escaping the state was a winning tactic. Any success in denying Republicans a quorum would almost certainly be temporary.

As Plesa waffled, her husband put on the song “Should I Stay or Should I Go,” by the Clash. It was a joke, and they laughed, but one lyric resonated: “If I go, there will be trouble / And if I stay, it will be double.”

Plesa went. That’s how she found herself at a union hall in a Chicago suburb the other day, standing in front of a large Lone Star flag, and attacking Abbott’s tactics as a “power grab.” The Governor’s move, undertaken at Donald Trump’s behest, was a clear ploy to help Republicans preserve their narrow majority in the House by increasing the likelihood of the Party capturing five additional congressional seats in the 2026 midterms. The redistricting was made even more controversial by the fact that it was happening long before the next census. “This is not just about Texas or Texans,” Plesa said in front of a battery of television cameras. “This is about the pillars of democracy as we know it.”

More than fifty Democratic legislators decamped on August 3rd in what is known as a quorum break. (The tactic was first used in Texas in 1870 by thirteen state senators who objected to a Radical Republican plan to create a state militia and increase the governor’s powers in a time of lawlessness and anti-Black violence.) What started as an attempt to pressure Abbott into withdrawing the redistricting plan has since become a mission with all the subtlety of Paul Revere’s ride, as the Texas lawmakers shout a warning to all who will listen. “We’re no longer on the path to authoritarianism. We are there,” Representative Gina Hinojosa told me after flying from Chicago to Sacramento to meet with Gavin Newsom, the California governor, and other prominent Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi. “The only way that we have any hope of getting out of this is if every freedom-loving American does everything in their power to push back.”

The plan was to stay out of Texas until August 19th, when Abbott’s thirty-day special session was scheduled to end. Plesa had packed a large suitcase, a smaller carry-on, and a work bag that included her cords and chargers; she’d brought contact numbers for constituent services and professional clothes for being in the public eye. She also had made sure to bring an intricately etched Romanian gold coin that once belonged to her grandmother, who had emigrated from Bucharest as Nicolae Ceauşescu consolidated one-party rule. To Plesa, recent moves by Abbott and Trump echoed stories that she had heard while growing up, and the coin telegraphed her grandmother’s spirit, helping to keep her grounded. “She was a little bit of a rabble-rouser and a rule-breaker,” Plesa said, “and she always told me, ‘Don’t make yourself smaller or softer for the world.’ ”

The majority of the Texas Democrats had flown by charter plane to Illinois, and were bused to a conference center in St. Charles, about forty miles west of downtown Chicago, but Plesa had flown commercial to Albany, where she and several colleagues met with Kathy Hochul, New York’s Democratic governor. Plesa quickly discovered that the exodus was big news. She spoke at a press conference, seated beside Hochul, and appeared on several cable and network television shows. As a self-described “small-town politician out of Dallas,” she found it surreal. “I mean, people had heard of us,” she said. After she met the Reverend Al Sharpton and appeared on his radio show, she thought, “Oh, my God, this is insane.”

Plesa then joined her colleagues in Illinois. She arrived late on August 5th and fell into her bed at the hotel where many of the Texas legislators were staying, only to wake early the next morning to a bomb threat that forced the evacuation of the building. “I always knew this was serious,” she said later, “but I never thought, Wow, my life is actually going to be in danger.” It was the first of two bomb threats, amid other forms of intimidation and harassment.

Despite being away from home, the Texas Democrats say they have been working harder than ever. Plesa’s days have been dominated by media appearances and strategy sessions, twice-a-day remote meetings with her four staff members back in Texas, and conferences with two sets of attorneys, who offered advice when the Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit to declare thirteen Democratic seats vacant, including Plesa’s. Gene Wu, a Houston representative who chairs the Democratic caucus, pointed to the circles under his eyes and told me that he is sleeping no more than four hours a night. “Every five seconds, there’s either a crisis or another interview,” he said. “Everyone’s very, very tired.” He noted that the legislators are paid just seventy-two hundred dollars a year—“pre-tax,” he added—and “if they’re not at home, they’re not making money.”

From the beginning, as Abbott criticized the departed Democrats as “derelict,” Plesa realized that she needed to make calls to constituents, to let them know “that I haven’t abandoned them.” She described what she was doing and why, telling her precinct chairs that Abbott had wrongly made redistricting his top priority after a call from Trump. Her pitch: “Are we working for the people of Texas or are we working for Donald Trump? We had nine hearings on redistricting. We had two on flooding. That tells you the priorities.” She pointed to the limited national attention given to the 2023 redistricting effort in North Carolina, which, in a narrowly divided state, turned a U.S. House of Representatives delegation of seven Republicans and seven Democrats into a G.O.P. majority of ten seats to four, enough to give control of the House to the Republicans. (Opponents are contesting the G.O.P. move in federal court.) “It’s like that famous quote—you know, ‘First they came for this group, and I said nothing,’ ” she told me.

At the press conference at the union hall, Wu opened by laying out the latest developments: John Cornyn, the Republican U.S. senator from Texas, had announced that the F.B.I. would help locate the Democrats, and Paxton, who will challenge Cornyn in next year’s primary, had declared that he would seek their arrest. Wu called the moves “laughable.” Plesa pointed to Vice-President J. D. Vance’s trip to Indiana, where he lobbied Republicans to redistrict, and she noted the counterattack in Democratic-run states, such as an effort by Newsom to create new maps likely to produce five Democratic seats in California. (A few days later, Newsom confirmed that he will ask voters in a November special election to abandon the current maps for the next three congressional elections. “We cannot unilaterally disarm,” he said.)

To demonstrate that the fight had grown beyond Texas, the lawmakers then directed their media audience to two large screens that showed a live stream of a press conference in California, where Newsom, Pelosi, and the Democratic leadership of the state legislature had just met with a half-dozen Texas lawmakers. Representative Ann Johnson, the first Texan to speak, warned of “the danger that is coming” by appeasing Trump, and drew a comparison that Plesa had also been making to reporters. “You-all remember,” Johnson said, “that Trump called Georgia and said, ‘Boys, I need eleven thousand votes.’ To their credit, those Republicans said, ‘No, we’re not doing that. That crosses a line.’ When Trump called Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Republicans and said, ‘Boys, I need you to steal five seats,’ they said, ‘Does July work for you?’ ”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

德州民主党 选区划分 民主捍卫 政治抗争 威权主义
相关文章