本期节目深入探讨了如何学习研究，帮助你从海量信息中找到关键信号。节目涵盖了不同类型的研究，从研究构思到执行的流程，以及如何识别研究的优势和局限性。此外，还讲解了临床试验的运作机制，以及常见的偏差和陷阱。节目还深入分析了影响实验严谨性的关键因素，并讨论了如何衡量效应量、区分相对风险和绝对风险，以及统计显著性背后的真正含义。最后，节目介绍了Peter阅读科学论文的个人流程。

🤔 **研究的演变：**从研究构思到执行，研究经历了多个阶段，包括研究设计、数据收集、数据分析和结果解释。研究人员需要仔细考虑研究问题、设计研究方法、选择合适的样本量，并进行数据收集和分析，最终得出结论。

🔬 **不同类型的研究：**研究类型多样，包括临床试验、观察性研究和实验研究。临床试验旨在评估治疗方法的有效性和安全性，通常涉及随机分组和对照组。观察性研究观察个体或群体，记录他们的特征和结果，但不干预。实验研究通过操纵变量来研究因果关系。

📊 **统计显著性与效应量：**统计显著性是指结果不太可能是随机发生的，而效应量则衡量了干预措施的影响大小。了解统计显著性和效应量对于评估研究结果至关重要。

🧐 **识别研究的局限性：**研究并非完美无缺，存在一些局限性，例如样本量不足、偏差、研究方法的缺陷等。了解研究的局限性有助于更好地理解研究结果。

📚 **阅读科学论文的技巧：**阅读科学论文需要掌握一定的技巧，包括关注研究方法、结果解释和结论，以及评估研究的可靠性和可信度。

💪 **实践应用：**学习研究的目的是为了更好地理解和应用科学知识。将所学知识应用于实际生活中，例如选择健康的生活方式、评估健康信息、做出明智的医疗决策等。

View the Show Notes Page for This Episode

Become a Member to Receive Exclusive Content

Sign Up to Receive Peter’s Weekly Newsletter

This special episode is a rebroadcast of AMA #30, now made available to everyone, in which Peter and Bob Kaplan dive deep into all things related to studying studies to help one sift through the noise to find the signal. They define various types of studies, how a study progresses from idea to execution, and how to identify study strengths and limitations. They explain how clinical trials work, as well as biases and common pitfalls to watch out for. They dig into key factors that contribute to the rigor (or lack thereof) of an experiment, and they discuss how to measure effect size, differentiate relative risk from absolute risk, and what it really means when a study is statistically significant. Finally, Peter lays out his personal process when reading through scientific papers.

We discuss:

The ever-changing landscape of scientific literature [2:30]; The process for a study to progress from idea to design to execution [5:00]; Various types of studies and how they differ [8:00]; The different phases of clinical trials [19:45]; Observational studies and the potential for bias [27:00]; Experimental studies: randomization, blinding, and other factors that make or break a study [44:30]; Power, p-values, and statistical significance [56:45]; Measuring effect size: relative risk vs. absolute risk, hazard ratios, and “number needed to treat” [1:08:15]; How to interpret confidence intervals [1:18:00]; Why a study might be stopped before its completion [1:24:00]; Why only a fraction of studies are ever published and how to combat publication bias [1:32:00]; Frequency of training for Olympic weightlifting [1:22:15]; How post-activation potentiation (and the opposite) can improve power training and speed training [1:24:30]; The Strongman competition: more breadth of movement, strength, and stamina [1:32:00]; Why certain journals are more respected than others [1:41:00]; Peter’s process when reading a scientific paper [1:44:15]; and More.

Connect With Peter on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube