Astral Codex Ten Podcast feed 2024年07月17日
Carbon Dioxide: An Open Door Policy
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项研究显示,室内二氧化碳浓度从良好通风水平增加到不良通风水平,会显著影响认知能力,测试分数可能降低多达50%。这一发现引起了NASA的关注,并影响了人们改善居住环境的方式。

🔍 研究发现,室内二氧化碳浓度增加会显著降低认知能力测试分数,这一结果在多个研究中得到证实。

🚀 NASA对这一研究非常感兴趣,因为太空船需要高度智力工作且无法开窗通风,他们正在进行相关测试。

🏠 研究者的室友们测试了室内空气质量,发现二氧化碳浓度高达1000-3000 ppm,随后他们采取措施改善通风,问题大多得到解决。

🌿 室内植物和开窗通风被认为是改善室内空气质量的可行方法,一些遭受神秘疲劳的人也报告了积极的变化。

🧪 然而,也有研究未能发现二氧化碳浓度与认知能力之间的关联,这表明结果可能并不一致。

[Content note: reading this post might cause feelings of suffocation or provoke panic attacks in susceptible individuals. Epistemic status is very speculative.]

Last month I moved into a small cottage behind a big group house. The cottage is lovely. The big group house is also lovely, but the people in it started suffering mysterious minor ailments. Headaches, fatigue, poor sleep – all the things that will make your local family doctor say “Take two placebo and call me in the morning”. Using my years of medical training and expertise, I was able to…remain completely unaware of the problem while my housemates solved it themselves.

There’s been a flare-up of research interest in indoor carbon dioxide levels, precipitated by a Berkeley study (paperpopular article) finding that increasing CO2 concentration from the level of a well-ventilated building to the level of a poorly-ventilated building had profound effects on cognitive ability, cutting various test scores by as much as 50%. This was so dramatic as to be implausible, but seems to match the result of previous Hungarian studies and a later Harvard study on the same subject. The Harvard team later replicated their result with real workers in real offices and found that, controlling for other factors, workers in the best-ventilated offices scoredabout 25% better on cognitive tests than in the worst-ventilated ones. NASA got really interested in this research because spaceships require a lot of intellectual work and don’t have a lot of open windows. They’re still running tests but they say that “preliminary results suggest differences” between better- and worse- ventilated environments.

On the other hand, a 2017 study failed to find the effect, possibly because their cognitive tests were easier. And bloggers have pointed out that submarines have more CO2 than the worst terrestrial buildings, but don’t have any problems overt enough for the Navy to notice or worry. So it’s a crapshoot of contradictory results and considerations, just like everything else.

Aware of this research, my housemates tested their air quality and got levels between 1000 and 3000 ppm, around the level of the worst high-CO2 conditions in the studies. They started leaving their windows open and buying industrial quantities of succulent plants, and the problems mostly disappeared. Since then they’ve spread the word to other people we know afflicted with mysterious fatigue, some of whom have also noticed positive results.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

室内空气 二氧化碳 认知能力 NASA研究 通风改善
相关文章