Scott Alexander的博文评论了《悲伤与智慧》这本书，引发了读者热烈的讨论。评论者对这本书的评价褒贬不一，有人认为这本书内容空洞、浪费时间，也有人认为这本书充满深刻见解，值得一读。评论中也探讨了作者的写作风格和这本书的潜在价值。

🤔 这篇博文引发了读者对《悲伤与智慧》这本书的热烈讨论，评论者对这本书的评价褒贬不一。一些读者认为这本书内容空洞、浪费时间，甚至认为作者写作风格过于冗长，缺乏实质内容。

🧐 然而，也有不少读者认为这本书充满深刻见解，值得一读。他们认为书中探讨了人生的意义、悲伤的本质以及智慧的追求，对他们的思考方式产生了积极的影响。

🧐 评论中也探讨了作者的写作风格。一些读者认为作者的写作风格过于冗长，缺乏清晰的逻辑结构，让人难以理解。而另一些读者则认为作者的写作风格独特，充满了诗意和哲理，值得细细品味。

🧐 最终，这篇文章引发了读者对这本书的价值的思考。有些人认为这本书仅仅是作者的个人观点，缺乏客观性和科学性。而另一些人则认为这本书提供了新的视角，让人对人生有了新的思考。

🤔 这篇文章反映了人们对不同观点和价值观的包容性。即使是同一本书，不同的读者也会产生不同的理解和评价。这或许也正是阅读的魅力所在，它可以让我们从不同的角度看待世界，思考人生。

https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/highlights-from-the-comments-on-sadly I. The Duality Of Man

Kalimac:

If you write more stuff like this, I think I will just gradually stop reading this blog.

Logan Strohl:

For the record this is my favorite Scott essay in years.

Leo Yankovic:

Reading this for the first time in a long time of reading [ACX] felt like a giant waste of time.

John Slow:

For what it's worth, this was my favorite ACX post.

Meh:

You read through an ENTIRE BOOK of that kind of pompous, long-winded drivel?

Paul:

Just this review injected a strong acid into my mind and it's burning through everything. I'm questioning my behaviors and thought patterns and then questioning the questioning. I realized how a lot of my thoughts are geared towards looking good in front of an imaginary audience . . . I'm definitely going to read this book.

ophis_uk:

It feels like this whole review, and to a large extent the comments, are carefully tiptoeing around an obvious conclusion, occasionally glancing sideways to look at it edge-on, but carefully avoiding confronting it directly. That conclusion is: Teach/TLP is a bad writer, and has therefore written a shit book.

AL:

Okay, maybe you're just reading the bones, but holy moley there are some crackling-good insights here!

Alex Power:

The review has successfully convinced me to not read this book.

FiveHourMarathon:

I got about halfway through and wrote in my notebook to call my local bookstore and see if they planned to stock it/could order one for me.

I am genuinely fascinated by how divergent all of your responses are. I wonder if anyone will Aumann update towards “there might really be something here” or “it might all be obscurantist drivel” after knowing that other people think so. If not, why not?

II. Reviews From Other People Who Have Read The Book