New Yorker 前天 18:23
A Season of Unease at the Edinburgh Festival
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

爱丁堡艺术节期间,苏格兰首府充斥着各种表演,从剧院到酒吧地下室。作者在六天内观看了二十八场演出,体验了节日的狂热氛围。然而,在表象的喧嚣之下,却涌动着一种不安。文中重点介绍了詹姆斯·格雷厄姆的戏剧《我们来做吧》,该剧以2008年苏格兰皇家银行倒闭为背景,将银行CEO塑造成希腊悲剧人物,反思了历史的教训。此外,文章还探讨了许多其他作品,它们以纪念碑式的方式呈现对过往苦难的回顾,例如关于监狱、政治事件和历史冲突的戏剧。这些作品通过戏剧的力量,迫使观众直面历史,引发对当下现实的思考,展现了艺术在记录和反思中的重要作用。

🎭 艺术节的喧嚣背后潜藏不安:爱丁堡艺术节虽然充满活力,但高昂的临时住房价格和一些长期参与者的影响力减弱,暗示了节庆背后存在的经济和社会压力,以及艺术界自身的变化。

🏛️ 戏剧作为历史的“活体纪念碑”:以苏格兰皇家银行倒闭为题材的《我们来做吧》等剧目,通过戏剧化的呈现,迫使观众反思历史事件,与静态的纪念碑不同,戏剧能够引发更深层次的情感共鸣和记忆。

✊ 艺术作品的政治与社会关怀:许多 Fringe 演出,如马克·托马斯的《普通体面罪犯》和尼什·库马尔的脱口秀,直接触及政治现实和历史遗留问题,如政治丑闻、殖民历史和文化遗产归还,展现了艺术作为社会评论和行动的载体。

🌍 跨国界的历史叙事与反思:尼尔·穆尔贾尼的《坎普尔:1857》等作品,通过讲述不同文化背景下的历史事件,如印度“叛乱”及其后续报复,以及巴勒斯坦诗人拉法特·阿拉里尔的诗句,展现了历史叙事的复杂性和代际传承的悲剧与希望。

💡 个人经历与集体记忆的交织:维多利亚·梅洛迪的《麻烦、挣扎、气泡和吱吱作响》将个人经历与社会运动联系起来,探讨了历史重演社群和社区中心的议题,呼应了17世纪的“掘土派”运动,展现了底层人民对资源占有的诉求和对乌托邦式的反抗精神。

For a few weeks each August, the Edinburgh International Festival and the Edinburgh Festival Fringe fill every theatre, student center, lecture hall, and pub basement in the Scottish capital with performances. Visitors and artists are encouraged to binge in every sense: in just six days, I was able to see twenty-eight shows—I know stronger, better people would have done more—and, while rushing down one picturesque cobblestone lane, I was also able to see three drunk guys barf in perfect Olympic synchrony. (My companion noted, primly, that there was an Oasis concert in town.)

Despite the Dionysian frenzy, which was not merely drunken but often sweet and social, it seemed to me to be a particularly uneasy season. You heard everywhere that the price of temporary housing in Edinburgh had rocketed after Oasis scheduled part of its tour during the first half of the Fringe—for his part, Oasis’s Liam Gallagher described the festival as “people juggling fucking bollocks and that”—and it was hard not to notice that some longtime festival fixtures, like the commissioning producers Paines Plough, had reduced their usually dominating presence to a handful of plays.

The month’s biggest show—and the marquee offering of the International Festival—is James Graham’s “Make It Happen,” a retelling of the 2008 collapse of the Royal Bank of Scotland, which was briefly the richest bank in the world. Graham positions the bank’s hubristic C.E.O., Fred Goodwin (Sandy Grierson), as a figure from Greek tragedy: a chorus­ sings slowed-down pop songs whenever he considers a particularly deceptive outlay of funds, and he’s visited by the disapproving ghost of Adam Smith, the Scottish proto-economist and “father of capitalism,” played with desultory humor by Brian Cox. The writing is as bald as a pantomime script—“Your offer document, Fred, is magnificent,” one starstruck employee says—and takes a strangely sentimental stance on the Scottish financier’s guilt. Even after Graham demonstrates the bank’s world-breaking greed, he ends the play with Goodwin looking hopefully out at the horizon, as a chorus member carries a metaphorically freighted sapling (new growth!) onto the stage. Does Goodwin really need this syrupy quasi-redemption? I checked, and he’s still getting a pension from R.B.S. worth six hundred thousand pounds a year.

But, of course, that right there is the point of “Make It Happen”—to make us check, to make us look back. Graham’s play, like many shows in this year’s offerings, functions as both testimonial and memento. In all the recent hubbub around problematic memorials and whether they should stay up or come down, we rarely note that fake Doric columns or big equestrian statues do a crummy job of reminding us about our history. Plays can force you to sit and remember; monuments allow you to walk by and forget.

Many of the finest productions I saw in the Fringe took the position of living memorials to horrors. Sometimes an insistence on accuracy turned these shows into political statements, whether they were originally designed that way or not. The great comedian-activist Mark Thomas, starring as Frankie in Ed Edwards’s solo prison drama “Ordinary Decent Criminal” (one of Paines Plough’s two offerings), did such a fine job of making the case for socialist solidarity with the I.R.A. that the actor broke the fourth wall to rail against the actual Orange Order march by Irish Protestants in the park just outside the venue. “Now back to the script,” Thomas said, after shaking a fist. The comedian Nish Kumar, who delivered a superb, motormouthed roller-coaster of a standup hour called “Nish, Don’t Kill My Vibe,” spent time reminding the audience both of Boris Johnson’s violations of British COVID lockdown law and of the Royal Family’s refusal to repatriate the Koh-i-Noor diamond. (“I didn’t mind the old lady,” he said, referring to the Queen. He clearly has less affection for Charles.)

Niall Moorjani, in their play “Kanpur: 1857,” actually describes an existing monument, one that still stands on the Edinburgh Castle esplanade, erected in honor of the members of the 78th Highland Regiment lost in the so-called Indian Mutiny. But no complete history is written in stone. Moorjani’s character—a rebel tied to a cannon, desperately trying to placate a cheerfully murderous British officer (Jonathan Oldfield)—emphasizes the complexity of accurately telling the story of a war. The rebel describes the massacre of hundreds of British women and children at the hands of the revolutionaries; they also describe the ensuing reprisals by the colonizers against thousands of Indians. Moorjani ends their lyrically written tale about atrocity and asymmetric vengeance with the projection of a few lines by Refaat Al-Areer, a Palestinian poet: “If I must die / let it bring hope / let it be a tale.” Al-Areer was killed by an Israeli air strike in 2023.

A buzz of baffled sorrow, or laughter-in-extremis, underlay almost every production I saw, including several hour-long shows about, variously, sexual assault, state terror, and queer embattlement. The trans performer Chiquitita’s exuberant turn in the sexually frank “Red Ink,” an often hilarious autobiographical one-person work by the activist and sex worker Cecilia Gentili about growing up trans in Argentina, is shadowed by the text’s prescience about Gentili’s early death. My lightest evening ended with “Common Knowledge,” a strange, wistful monologue about raising a nonbinary child by Rosie O’Donnell, who has moved to Ireland to avoid the long arm of Donald Trump and his threats issued via Truth Social. This came up a few times—the sense of U.S. artists being in exile, or being too afraid to go back home.

My favorite work in the look-back-to-look-now vein was Victoria Melody’s “Trouble, Struggle, Bubble and Squeak,” a delightfully oddball solo account of her participation in two apparently very different associations: an English Civil War-reënactment society and the community center at a social housing estate, where residents are sometimes forbidden from controlling their local green spaces. The two strands of her tale come together in her deep interest in the Diggers, the proto-socialist seventeenth-century resistance movement that called the earth a “common treasury” and argued that certain resources should be expropriated by the people. Everywhere she finds wonderful people, everyday heroes, in and out of armor. Melody wears a period-appropriate red woolen musketeer’s outfit, and apologizes for her period-inappropriate water goblet (“I’ve got a tankard coming!”), but the shy, tiny, funny woman is really a radical in elf’s clothing, bearing a new message of utopian rebellion.

The lushest, most physically beautiful offerings were often from countries where government arts funding still meaningfully supports performance. The Brazilian production of Michel Marc Bouchard’s violent pastoral “Tom at the Farm,” directed in mud-covered, extravagantly physical fashion by Rodrigo Portella, transposes the original Canadian setting to a sepia-lit anywhere, where Tom (Armando Babaioff), forcibly re-closeted at his dead partner’s rural home, falls under the hypnotic control of his lover’s brutal brother (Iano Salomão). (Babaioff himself adapted the play, galvanized by the homophobia in his native Brazil.) Perhaps the most stunning production I saw was the wordless physical-theatre piece “Works and Days,” by the Belgian company FC Bergman, in the International Festival. Again, the focus was on earth: the show portrays a collaborative agrarian society (actors literally till the stage as though it were soil, ramming a plow through its boards, then raise a barn together) that eventually welcomes technology in the form of a copper steam engine. Once this clanking god arrives, the members of this society writhe nakedly in its red shadow, but they never collaborate on anything again. Afterward, at the talk-back, the creator-actor Stef Aerts described his theatre group as “romantic nihilists.” Humanity seems to be moving toward its end, Aerts said, but they were content to know that other forms of life would continue without them. Perhaps “Works and Days,” too, was a memorial; this strange, often ecstatic show was like a funeral rite for all of us, just a little ahead of schedule. ♦

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

爱丁堡艺术节 戏剧评论 历史反思 社会现实 艺术与政治
相关文章