少点错误 23小时前
Rant: the extreme wastefulness of high rent prices
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了高地租金对社会经济的负面影响。为了更有效地开展业务,人们倾向于聚集在像硅谷这样的地方。然而,这种聚集导致了高昂的租金,不仅包括实际的房屋租金,还包括食品、税收等间接成本。这些高额租金并未流入少数“地主”手中,而是被浪费在无用的竞争性活动中,例如房地产投机、广告、官僚主义以及相关教育等。最终,高地租金导致社会整体财富的减少,并降低了创业的活力。文章最后提出了一种解决方案:政府拥有土地,仅按维护价格出租,并由邻居投票决定租户。

🏘️ 人们为了高效的商业活动而聚集,导致高地租金的出现,这不仅仅是房屋租金,还包括食品、税收等间接成本,形成一种“网络效应”,迫使人们集中在特定区域。

🔥 高地租金并非流入少数“地主”手中,而是在竞争中被消耗殆尽。人们花费大量时间和资源在房地产投机、广告、官僚主义等方面,试图在房地产游戏中获胜,导致资源浪费。

🗳️ 解决方案是政府拥有土地,仅按维护价格出租,并通过邻居投票的方式来选择租户,从而降低租金成本,提高社会资源的利用效率。

Published on May 25, 2025 5:04 PM GMT

09:46: Everyone wants to be close to everyone else to do good business effectively. Like Silicon Valley for example, smart people want to go there and be close to other smart people in order to start a successful business.
09:47: But as soon as they get close to each other, imagine that they all have to pay this extremely high rent. Simply once they get close to each other. They can't all move house at once to a new city. That's too difficult. So this network effect forces them to concentrate in one place.
09:47: They want to be close to each other, they are attracted to each other. But once they get close enough this really high rent emerges below them.
09:48: And they have to pay a lot of money towards this rent. This "rent" isn't just the actual technical rent. It's money they pay in mortgages to buy their house. It's money they pay in groceries to a grocery store which is paying high rent. And money they pay the government in taxes to pay for a hospital which pays a lot for buying (or renting) the property, especially if they have to expand.
09:49: And so they pay this really high rent. Which greatly reduces their wealth, the viability of startups, and so forth.
09:50: And where does this rent go? I wished it went to some mystical "landlord" class. Who then become rich. And that it's a zero sum game, these people lose a lot of money, but someone else gains money, so in the end it's okay.
09:51: But no, it doesn't go to some mythical landlord class, unfortunately. A more practical understanding is this rent is money which someone throws at random into a crowd.
09:51: They stand on a high building and throw it all down.
09:51: At first a few lucky people pick up the money and become happy. But once news of them becoming rich breaks out, more people from far away say I want that too, and arrive to pick up the money. And they all become rich, causing the news to make more people come. And more people come. And finally, it reaches equilibrium. So many people are coming to pick up this free money, that a lot of them loses money, and on average they are no better off, their job is no easier than other jobs, due to the extreme competition picking up this free money. It costs people so much time and resources to get this free money, due to the competition for picking it up, that in the end it's no more efficient than any other career. It is no longer free money. It is money spent paying for useless work.
09:54: And so it's not a zero sum game. It's a negative sum game. The rent paid does not go to some mystical landlord class who are now extremely happy. The rent paid is burned. Into doing useless work.
09:55: It goes to a million different things people spend time and resources on to win as much as they can in the real estate game. Advertising. Speculation. Bureaucracy. Education in the bureaucracy, some of which goes to people who never find suitable work.
09:56: So how do we fix this problem? One way is to build a city where the government owns the land, rents it only for the maintenance price, and chooses people by letting neighbours vote who gets to fill in each vacancy.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

高地租金 资源浪费 房地产投机 政府调控
相关文章