TechCrunch News 01月28日
Quartz has been quietly publishing AI-generated news articles
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

Quartz新闻机构正在试验使用AI生成新闻文章,这些文章署名为“Quartz Intelligence Newsroom”,内容主要聚合其他媒体的报道。虽然最初只是简单的财报,但现在已扩展到短篇新闻,例如一篇关于济州航空事故调查的文章。这些文章长度约400字,不包含直接引语,仅在文章开头标注来源。Quartz母公司承认这是一个实验项目,旨在让编辑人员专注于更深入的报道。然而,AI文章的质量控制似乎不足,例如一篇关于删除社交媒体账户的文章,其内容含糊不清。尽管如此,Quartz表示读者对AI文章的反应和参与度超出了预期,并否认存在财务问题。

📰 Quartz开始使用AI生成新闻文章,署名为“Quartz Intelligence Newsroom”,文章内容主要聚合其他媒体的报道。

📝 这些AI生成的文章长度约为400字,不包含直接引语,并且在文章开头标注来源。

⚙️ Quartz的AI新闻室旨在解放编辑人员,让他们专注于更深入的报道,但文章的质量控制似乎有待提高。

🤔 Quartz表示读者对AI文章的反应和参与度超出了预期,并否认存在财务问题,但AI新闻写作的准确性与道德问题仍然值得关注。

Quartz, the international business news outlet, has been quietly aggregating reporting from other outlets, including TechCrunch, in order to publish AI-generated articles under the byline “Quartz Intelligence Newsroom.”  

Quartz started publishing simple AI-generated earnings reports months ago, but beginning last week, the outlet moved on to short articles. One of the 18 AI-generated articles published as of Monday afternoon, titled “South Korea shares preliminary findings on Jeju Air crash investigation,” aggregates reporting done by real journalists at CNN, MSN, and The Associated Press on MSN.com. 

Each of the outlet’s AI-generated articles is roughly 400 words in length, and includes no full quotes from sources. Rather than attributing information in the body of the text, as flesh-and-blood journalists do, Quartz’s AI writer only cites its sources at the very top of its pieces.

A spokesperson for Quartz corporate parent G/O Media confirmed to TechCrunch the existence of a “purely experimental” AI newsroom, without commenting on which AI models or tools the publication uses to write AI-generated news articles. 

It is not clear how Quartz’s AI newsroom chooses which stories to cover. The spokesperson said that the goal is to free up Quartz’s editorial staff to “work on longer and more deeply reported articles,” and that the editorial staff reviews each AI-generated story before it is published.

The quality control seems to be lacking, however, going by one article that Quartz’s AI newsroom sourced from TechCrunch last week.  

A Screenshot of an AI-generated Quartz article that sources techCrunch reporting.Image Credits:Quartz

The article in question is a piece I wrote detailing how you can delete your Facebook, Instagram, and Threads accounts. For each platform, it provides step-by-step instructions on how to download and save your data before deleting it and, ultimately, your accounts.

This was a weird article to turn into a 300-word AI-generated summary. The Quartz article’s headline – “How to delete your Facebook, Instagram, and Threads right now” – hints at a how-to piece similar to mine. But its account deletion instructions are vague:

To permanently delete a Facebook account, users must navigate to the “Settings & Privacy” section and select “Account Ownership and Control.” It’s important to note that once an account is deleted, it cannot be retrieved. For Instagram, users either use the Account Center or settings to download their data before deleting their profiles. Deleting Threads profiles requires removing the linked Instagram account, as the two are interconnected.

I could probably spend all day critiquing the “AI-ness” of Quartz’s AI newsroom articles. I mean, just look this headline: “Jobless claims rise slightly as continuing claims set a record.” Word echo aside, the clause is a contradiction. Jobless claims are rising only “slightly,” yet some other “continuing claims” are setting a record? Tsk, tsk. My editor would never let me publish something so sloppy.

Informative disclaimer at the bottom of every AI-generated Quartz story.Image Credits:Quartz

G/O Media, which is owned by private equity firm Great Hill Partners, came under fire in July 2023 for publishing error-filled AI-generated content without input from G/O’s editors or writers. The company’s editorial director at the time, Merrill Brown, defended the practice, even as journalists at G/O-owned outlets like Gizmodo objected to it.

Publishing AI-generated content presents a way for publishers like Quartz to access cheap labor — AI doesn’t command benefits and a salary, after all — while potentially maximizing profits. The G/O spokesperson said reader response to and engagement with its AI stories have “far exceeded our expectations to this point.”

The spokesperson also denied rumors of cash woes, saying that the company is “very well funded” with a “good amount of working capital to draw on if needed.” They also noted that previous staff reductions were due to the sale of some sites in 2024, but that Quartz is in the process of hiring more editorial staff. 

G/O isn’t the first media organization to dabble with AI-generated content. CNET and Gannett have published their own factually inaccurate AI-generated stories and art, and — in the case of Sports Illustrated — under fabricated bylines.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI新闻 Quartz 内容聚合 新闻伦理
相关文章