少点错误 01月27日
The Clueless Sniper and the Principle of Indifference
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文中讲述一位优秀狙击手,面对三英里外的目标,上级要求射击,狙击手认为远距离射击受多种外部因素影响,难以保证不伤及无辜孩子,上级提出运用无差别原则射击,引发对该做法是否合理的讨论。

狙击手是世界上最优秀的远程狙击手之一,擅长考虑影响子弹方向的外部因素。

任务是观察建筑物内的动静并通知盟友,恐怖分子头目出现并挟持孩子。

狙击手认为从三英里外射击,难以计算众多外部因素,拒绝射击。

上级提出无差别原则,即不考虑外部因素直接射击,认为这样更可能击中目标。

Published on January 27, 2025 11:52 AM GMT

You are one of the best long-range snipers in the World. You often have to eliminate targets standing a mile away and rarely miss. Crucially, this is not because you are better than others at aligning the scope of your rifle with the target’s head before taking the shot. Rather, this is because you are better at accounting for the external factors that will influence the bullet’s direction (e.g., the wind, gravity, etc.). Estimating these external factors is crucial for your success. One day, you are on a roof with binoculars, looking at a building three miles away that you and your team know is filled with terrorists and their innocent children. Your superior is beside you, looking in the same direction. Your mission is to inform your allies closer to the building if you see any movement. After a long wait, the terrorist leader comes out, holding a child close to him. He knows snipers might be aiming at them and would not want to shoot the kid. They are hastily heading towards another building nearby. You grab your radio to inform your allies but your superior stops you and hands you your sniper. “He’s so exposed. This is a golden opportunity for you.” she says. “I reckon we’ve got two minutes before they reach the other building. Do you think you can get him?“. You know that your superior generally accepts risking the lives of innocents but only if there are more bad guys than innocents killed, in expectation. “Absolutely not.” you respond. “We are three miles away! I’ve never taken a shot from this far. NO ONE has ever hit a target from this far. I’m just as likely to hit the kid.” Your superior takes a few seconds to think. “You always say that where the bullet ends up is the result of an equation: ‘where you aim + the external factors’, right?” she says. “Yes,” you reply nervously “And I have no idea how to account for the external factors from that far. There are so many different wind layers between us and the target. The Earth’s rotation and the spin drift of the bullet matter also a hell of a lot from this distance.  I would also have to factor in the altitude, humidity, and temperature of the air. I don’t have the faintest idea what this sums up to overall from this far! I’m clueless. I wouldn’t be more likely to get him and not the kid if I were to shoot with my eyes closed.” Your superior turns her head towards you. “Principle of indifference,” she says. “You have no clue how external factors will affect your shot. You don’t know if they tell you to aim more a certain way rather than another. So simply don’t adjust your shot! Aim at this jerk and shoot as if there were no external factors! And you’ll be, in expectation, more likely to hit him than the kid.”

I'm curious whether people agree with the superior. Do you think applying the POI is warranted, here? Any rationale behind why (not)?



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

狙击手 外部因素 无差别原则 艰难抉择
相关文章