TechCrunch News 01月22日
Former Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg sanctioned by judge for allegedly deleting emails
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

特拉华州法官因雪莉·桑德伯格涉嫌删除与剑桥分析公司隐私丑闻相关的电子邮件而对其进行制裁。Meta股东指控桑德伯格和另一位前董事杰夫·齐恩茨使用个人邮箱讨论2018年股东诉讼相关事宜,该诉讼指控Facebook领导人未能保护用户隐私。法官认为桑德伯格使用化名个人邮箱并选择性删除邮件,违反了法院指令。因此,法官提高了桑德伯格辩护的法律标准,她必须以“清晰且令人信服”的证据来证明自己的辩护,并承担原告的部分费用。此案源于Meta涉嫌违反2012年联邦贸易委员会的命令,该命令要求其停止在未经用户同意的情况下收集和共享用户数据。

⚖️ 特拉华州法官因雪莉·桑德伯格涉嫌删除与剑桥分析公司隐私丑闻相关的电子邮件而对其进行制裁,此事源于Meta股东提起的诉讼。

📧 诉讼指控桑德伯格使用个人邮箱(包括一个化名邮箱)讨论与2018年股东诉讼相关的事宜,并删除了法院禁止删除的邮件,这表明她并非使用自动删除功能,而是有选择性地删除邮件。

⚠️ 法官认为桑德伯格的行为违反了法院指令,因此提高了她辩护的法律标准,她必须以“清晰且令人信服”的证据来证明自己的辩护,而非仅仅是“优势证据”,并且需要承担原告的部分费用。

💰 此案的核心是Meta被指控违反2012年联邦贸易委员会的命令,该命令要求Meta停止在未经用户同意的情况下收集和共享用户数据,Meta还被指控向包括剑桥分析公司在内的商业伙伴出售数据,并删除了隐私设置中的必要披露。

A Delaware judge has sanctioned Sheryl Sandberg, Meta’s former COO and board member, for allegedly deleting emails related to the Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal.

The decision arises from a case Meta shareholders brought against Sandberg and another former Meta board member, Jeff Zients, late last year. The plaintiffs alleged that Sandberg and Zients used personal email accounts to communicate about issues relating to a 2018 shareholder lawsuit that accused Facebook leaders of violating the law — and their fiduciary duties — in failing to protect users’ privacy.

Plaintiffs also alleged that Sandberg and Zients deleted emails from their personal inboxes despite being instructed not to do so by a court. In a decision Tuesday, the Delaware judge overseeing the case found the accusations to be convincing.

“The defendants disclosed Sandberg’s personal Gmail account, maintained under a pseudonym, that she used to ‘communicate about matters potentially relevant to the claims and defenses in this action,’” the judge’s decision reads. “Counsel’s failure to give a straight answer in Sandberg’s interrogatory responses or when answering plaintiffs’ questions supports an inference that Sandberg was not using an auto-delete function but rather picking and choosing which emails to delete.”

In sanctioning Sandberg, the judge raised the legal standard for Sandberg’s affirmative defense, the defense based on facts other than those in support of the plaintiff’s claim. Now, Sandberg must prove her defense by “clear and convincing” evidence — not merely a “preponderance” of evidence, a burden that’s easier to clear.

The judge has also awarded plaintiffs certain expenses.

At the root of the courtroom battle are allegations that Meta officials violated a 2012 FTC order under which the company agreed to stop collecting and sharing Facebook users’ personal data without their consent. Facebook allegedly later sold the data to commercial partners, including political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, and allegedly removed disclosures from privacy settings that were required under the FTC’s order.

In 2019, Meta agreed to pay the FTC $5 billion to settle charges that the company violated the 2012 order. The company has also paid penalties from regulators in Europe.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

雪莉·桑德伯格 剑桥分析公司 隐私丑闻 邮件删除 法律制裁
相关文章