少点错误 2024年12月24日
How Much to Give is a Pragmatic Question
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了在有效利他主义框架下,如何确定个人捐赠比例的问题。文章指出,虽然10%的收入捐赠是传统,但对于以“挣钱行善”为目标的人来说,可能需要更高的比例。文章强调,捐赠比例并非纯粹的原则问题,而是一个需要平衡个人需求和利他影响的务实问题。作者建议制定不同捐赠比例的预算,并考虑在收入增加时捐赠更大比例。最终目标是在捐赠和个人生活之间找到平衡点,确保既能为世界做出贡献,又能保持个人生活质量。

💰 传统的捐赠比例如10%收入或2.5%财富,但对于“挣钱行善”者可能不够高,有些人甚至捐赠50%甚至75%的收入。

⚖️ 捐赠比例不是纯粹的原则问题,而是一个需要在利他影响和个人需求之间找到平衡的务实问题。过度捐赠可能导致倦怠,反而降低长期影响。

📊 建议制定不同捐赠比例(如5%、10%、20%)的预算,并考虑在收入增加时捐赠更大比例,例如将收入增长部分的50%用于捐赠。

🎯 目标是找到一个既能让你对捐赠感到满意,又能保持个人生活质量的平衡点。这是一个非常个性化的问题,每个人的选择都会不同。

Published on December 24, 2024 4:20 AM GMT

I was recently talking to someone who had recently started thinkingabout effective altruism, and was trying to figure out how to work itinto their life. They were established in their career, it paidwell, and their background wasn't obviously a good fit for directwork, so they were naturally considering earning togive. This prompts a question of how much to give.

"How much?" is a question people have struggled with for a very longtime. Donating 10% of income has a long history, and it'scommon for EAs to pledge to do this;donating 2.5% of wealth is also traditional. Ifyou're earning to give, however, you might want to give more: Juliaand I have been giving 50%; Allan Saldanhahas been giving 75%since2019. How should one decide?

I was hoping there were good EA blog posts on this topic, but afterspending a while with EA Forum search and Google I didn't find any.Claude kept tellingme I should check out Jeff Kaufman's blog, but all I found was arough post from 2011. Sohere's an attempt that I think is better than my old post, but stillnot great.

While EAs talk a lot about principles, I think this is fundamentally apragmatic question. I find the scale of the world's problemsoverwhelming; no one has enough money to eliminate poverty, disease,or the risk we make ourselves extinct. This is not to say donationsdon't matter—there are a lot of excellent options for making theworld better—but there's not going to be a point where I'm goingto be satisfied and say "Good! That's done now." This gives a strongintellectual pull to donate to the point where donating another dollarwould start to decrease my altruistic impact, by interfering in my work; burning out does notmaximize your impact!

In the other direction, I'm notfully altruistic. I like some amount of comfort, there are fun thingsI want to do, and I want my family to have good lives. I'm willing togo pretty far in the altruism direction (I donate 50% and took a 75% pay cut to domore valuable work) but it's a matter of balance.

Which means the main advice I have is to give yourself the informationyou need to make a balanced choice. I'd recommend making a fewdifferent budgets: how would your life look if you gave 5%? 10%?20%? In figuring out where you'd cut it might be helpful to ignorethe donation aspect: how would your budget change if your industrystarted doing poorly?

In some ways Julia and I had this easy: we got into these ideas whenwe were just starting out and livingcheaply, while we could still be careful about which luxuries toadopt and maintaininexpensive tastes. It's much harder to cut back! So anotherthing I'd recommend, especially if you haven't yet reached peakearning years, is to plan to donate a disproportionately largefraction of pay increases. For example, 10% of your (inflationadjusted!) 2024 salary plus 50% of any amount over that.

Overall, the goal is to find a level where you feel good about yourdonations but are also still keeping enough to thrive. This is a verypersonal question, and people land in a bunch of different places.But wherever you do end up, I'm glad to be working with you.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

有效利他主义 捐赠比例 挣钱行善 财务平衡 个人选择
相关文章