Fortune | FORTUNE 2024年11月23日
More than 113 million people are drinking tap water that contains a newly identified chemical—and nobody knows if it’s toxic or not
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项新的研究发现,自20世纪30年代以来广泛用于饮用水的氯胺消毒剂会产生一种名为氯硝酰胺的新型化合物。这种化合物此前一直未被识别,但研究人员已在40个美国饮用水样本中检测到它,并且在某些情况下,其浓度甚至超过了EPA对大多数消毒副产物的限值。虽然目前尚不清楚氯硝酰胺的毒性,但其普遍存在以及与其他有毒分子的相似性令人担忧。幸运的是,研究人员发现活性炭可以去除这种化合物,例如Brita滤水器等。这项发现引发了人们对饮用水安全性的关注,也凸显了政府在饮用水安全监管方面的重要性。

💧一项新的研究发现,氯胺消毒剂会产生一种名为氯硝酰胺的新型化合物,此前一直未被识别。

🧪研究人员在美国10个饮用水系统中的40个样本中检测到氯硝酰胺,部分样本中的浓度超过了EPA的限值。

⚠️尽管氯硝酰胺的毒性尚不明确,但其存在及其与其他毒性分子的相似性引发了担忧。

✅研究发现活性炭可以有效去除氯硝酰胺,例如Brita滤水器等。

🤔氯硝酰胺的发现引发了人们对饮用水安全的关注,也强调了政府在监管饮用水安全方面的重要性。

The new chemical compound—observed in tap water by scientists for decades—had remained unidentified, due to difficulties separating it from the high-salinity (saltier) water it was found in. But dogged researchers found a way, and now, according to a Nov. 21 research article published in the journal Science, there is a name for the compound: chloronitramide. That’s a byproduct of naturally occurring chemicals and chloramine—a disinfectant formed when ammonia is added to chlorine, added to drinking water since the 1930s to help stop the presence of harmful organisms, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. In the U.S. alone, notes the article, chloraminated water systems serve more than 113 million people.But is it toxic? That part, unfortunately, remains a mystery.“Although toxicity is not currently known, the prevalence of this by-product and its similarity to other toxic molecules is concerning,” writes editor Michael A. Funk in the article’s summary. The chloronitramide was detected in 40 drinking water samples from 10 U.S. drinking water systems using chloramines, according to the article. In some cases, researchers found it at levels higher than the EPA limit on most disinfection byproducts. It was not detected in ultrapure water or drinking water not treated with chlorine-based disinfectants—in Switzerland, for example, where ozone is used for disinfection. A bit of good news is that the authors identified a way for consumers to remove the chemical byproduct from water: activated carbon. “It’s been shown to be removed by activated carbon in the literature,” study co-author and EPA researcher David Wahman said in a press conference about the findings on Thursday. “There probably needs to be a little bit more work done to figure out what it’s being broken down into…But I think a Brita filter, or…any kind of carbon based filter that you’d have in your refrigerator would probably remove it.”The news about chloronitramide comes on the heels of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., president elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Health and Human Services Department, raising concerns about fluoride in drinking water. He has said that Trump will rid tap water of the chemical ion—which has been added to water on a widespread basis since 1962 to prevent tooth decay—on his first day in office, citing a range of health risks. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention maintains that fluoridated drinking water is safe. Regarding the chloramines, water expert David Sedlak, Plato Malozemoff Professor of Environmental Engineering at UC Berkeley, told CNN, “The challenge is, we don’t really know about the health impacts, because unlike the free chlorine disinfection byproducts, there just hasn’t been as much toxicology done on these compounds.” And because local water systems cannot afford to investigate these byproducts, it will be up to the federal government, Sedlak said.“It’s the kind of thing that, when government is functioning well, it does a good job protecting us by looking at these things. But I don’t think the EPA or CDC or NIH has the funding needed to answer these questions,” he said.Susan D. Richardson, an expert in drinking water disinfection by-products at the University of South Carolina, told Chemical & Engineering News that the findings were groundbreaking. “It will be important to quantify this new disinfection byproduct in drinking water distribution systems to determine whether it increases or decomposes over time before it reaches consumers’ taps,” she said, adding that she suspects the chloronitramide is toxic but that the idea that activated carbon would remove it is “great.” Meanwhile, University of Southern California environmental engineering professor Daniel McCurry said in a Science journal commentary that the identification of chloronitramide, regardless of whether it’s found to be toxic or not, “warrants a moment of reflection for water researchers and engineers.”More about water:

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

氯硝酰胺 饮用水 氯胺 消毒副产物 活性炭
相关文章