文章探讨了法律如何处理深度伪造色情内容、语音克隆技术用于欺诈所造成的损害，提到了可能产生的巨大危害及相关案例，还表达了作者对法律应对这些情况的思考及疑问。

🎤深度伪造色情内容及语音克隆技术用于欺诈可能造成极大危害，如产生巨额经济损失，文中提到有欺诈案例可能造成5亿美元的损害。

👶制造儿童色情内容的模型可能被认为会造成同样巨大的损害，特别是当与试图勒索儿童等行为相结合时，后果不堪设想。

❓作者对自己的评论未得到回应感到惊讶，同时其帖子也未获得点赞，作者希望法律是经过深思熟虑的，也想了解法律如何处理这些问题。

Published on September 26, 2024 9:17 AM GMT

Recently, there was a post on SB-1047 and how it's quite mild regulation. I'm not expert on it and don't know how it works. 

In the comment section I was asking:

Why wouldn't deep fake porn or voice cloning technology to engage in fraud be powerful enough to materially contribute to critical harm?

There are cases of fraud that could do $500,000,000 in damages.

Given how juries decide about damages, a model that's used to create child porn for thousands of children could be argued to cause  $500,000,000 in damages as well. Especially when coupled with something like trying to extort the children.

I'm surprised that my comment didn't get any engagement where people explained how they think the law will handle those cases while at the same time my post got no karma votes.

I'd love to believe that the law is well thought out, and simply a good step for AI safety. At the same time, I also like having accurate beliefs about the effects of the law, so let me repeat my question here.

How does the law handle damage caused by deep fake porn or fraud with voice cloning?

 

Discuss