少点错误 2024年09月17日
How harmful is music, really?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨音乐对人的影响,通过实验分析听音乐与不听音乐时人的情绪及耳虫现象等方面的变化。

🎵 作者认为音乐是否有害曾存在争议,通过实验来探究其影响。实验中,作者根据随机布尔值决定是否听音乐,并记录实际情况及相关变量。

📈 实验进行了51天,排除因外部约束连续多天不听音乐的情况后,对有音乐和无音乐的日子进行对比分析。

💡 结果显示,短期内听音乐使人稍快乐,耳虫现象出现时间略减少,意外耳虫现象出现时间也略减少,对意外耳虫的具体歌曲影响较弱且较难衡量。

Published on September 17, 2024 2:53 PM GMT

For a while, I thought music was harmful, due largely to pervasive and arbitrary earworms. More recently, I started to find that earworms are ephemeral and lawful. A contrarian belief held like the former for years gets stuck as part of my identity, but maybe I should find the truth.

"Music is harmful" is hard to measure and verify. "Listening to music is harmful" is both easier to measure and more readily useful, for you can make a randomised controlled trial out of it.

Methods

Given that I deliberately listen to music only on rare occasion, it's easy, in my case, to let a column of random booleans in a spreadsheet dictate whether I listen to music each day. Sometimes I forgot to listen to music when the spreadsheet said I should, and sometimes I heard a lot of incidental music on days when the spreadsheet said I should abstain. To account for both cases, I kept a record of whether I actually did listen to music each day. Whether I actually listened to music is the explanatory variable, which ended up 50% correlated (phi coefficient) with whether the random boolean generator said I should.

The response variables are my mood — -1 to 1 — and the song stuck in my head — one of four categories:

Both response variables were queried by surprise, 0 to 23 times per day (median 6), constrained by convenience.

Analysis

I ran the experiment over 51 days. In all analysis here, I exclude three long intervals (11 days, 5 days, 4 days) of consecutive musical abstention due to outside constraints, leaving 31 days to examine.

Given these measurements, we can find the effects of listening to music by comparing the averages from days with music to those from days without music. It seems plausible that the effects of music lag or persist past the day of listening. Perhaps the better averages to compare would come from

What kind of harm do I expect to see from listening music?

Results

What does my data say about all that?

 MusicNo musicMusic + next day>1 day since
Days8231615
Average mood0.290.220.280.19
Total D+R+O431409687
Total N16393421
Total R+O341117768
Total N+D25685340
Total R317137
Total O31946461

It appears that listening to music, in the short-term:

    makes me a tad happiermakes earworms play in my mind for slightly less of the timemakes accidental earworms (as contrasted with deliberate earworms, or mental quiet) play slightly less of the timehas a weak, ambiguous effect on which songs I get as accidental earworms

Result 1 makes sense, but deserved testing, just to be sure. Results 2 and 3 go against my intuition. I'm less sure what to make of result 4, especially given that it's harder to measure — judging an accidental earworm as "recent" depends on a threshold of recency, which I left ambiguous, and on my memory of what songs I've heard recently, which can mess up on occasion.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

音乐影响 实验探究 耳虫现象
相关文章