AI News 2024年09月16日
AI and bots allegedly used to fraudulently boost music streams
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国一位歌手被指控利用人工智能技术和机器人操纵音乐流媒体平台,以虚假夸大其流媒体统计数据,并赚取数百万美元的版税。迈克尔·史密斯,52 岁,来自北卡罗来纳州,面临电信诈骗、共谋实施电信诈骗和洗钱的指控。据 BBC 报道,当局称这是 AI 首次被用来实施如此大规模的流媒体诈骗。美国检察官达米安·威廉姆斯强调了这种诈骗的规模,声称史密斯拿走了原本应该归属真正的音乐家、词曲作者和版权所有者的数百万美元版税。

👨‍💻 指控源于一项未公开的起诉书,该起诉书指控史密斯在多个流媒体平台上分发了数十万首 AI 生成的歌曲。为了逃避检测,自动机器人播放这些曲目,有时一次播放多达 10,000 首。据称史密斯在几年内非法赚取了超过 1000 万美元的版税。

🕵️ FBI 在调查中发挥了至关重要的作用。该机构的代理助理主任克里斯蒂·M·柯蒂斯解释说,该机构致力于追捕那些利用技术抢劫他人收入的人,同时破坏真正艺术家的努力。

📧 据起诉书称,史密斯从 2018 年左右开始与一家未公开的 AI 音乐公司的首席执行官合作。这位共谋者据称每月向史密斯提供数千首 AI 生成的曲目。作为交换,史密斯提供了元数据,如歌曲标题和艺术家姓名,并提供了一部分流媒体收入。

📈 2019 年 3 月,史密斯和这位未具名首席执行官之间的电子邮件往来表明了阴谋的形成过程。这位高管表示:“记住我们在这里做的事情......这不是‘音乐’,而是‘即时音乐’。”这封电子邮件强调了该行动的故意性质,以及使用 AI 以最小的努力生成大量内容。据起诉书称,这项技术随着时间的推移而改进,使得流媒体平台更难检测到欺诈性流媒体。

💰 在另一封日期为 2 月的电子邮件中,史密斯吹嘘他的 AI 生成的曲目自 2019 年以来已累计超过 40 亿次流媒体播放,并获得了 1200 万美元的版税。如果被判有罪,史密斯将面临因对他提出的指控而被判处重刑。

⚠️ 史密斯的案件并非唯一涉及虚假音乐流媒体版税的案件。今年早些时候,一名丹麦人因类似计划被判处 18 个月监禁。Spotify、Apple Music 和 YouTube 等音乐流媒体平台禁止使用机器人和人工流媒体来提高版税。这种行为具有破坏性且是非法的,平台已采取措施通过政策变更来打击这种行为。例如,如果检测到人工流媒体,Spotify 会向唱片公司或发行商收费,只有在满足某些标准的情况下,音乐才能获得版税。

A singer from the United States has been accused of manipulating music streaming platforms using AI technologies and bots to fraudulently inflate his stream statistics and earn millions of dollars in royalties.

Michael Smith, 52, from North Carolina, faces charges of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.

According to the BBC, authorities allege that this is the first time AI has been used to allow such a large-scale streaming scam. U.S. Attorney Damian Williams emphasised the scope of the fraud, claiming that Smith took millions of dollars in royalties that should have gone to real musicians, songwriters and rights holders.

The accusations stem from an unsealed indictment alleging that Smith distributed hundreds of thousands of AI-generated songs across multiple streaming platforms. To avoid detection, automated bots streamed the tracks—sometimes up to 10,000 at a time. Smith allegedly earned more than $10 million in illegal royalties over several years.

The FBI played a crucial role in the investigation. The agency’s acting assistant director, Christie M. Curtis, explained that the agency was dedicated to tracking down those who misuse technology to rob people of their earnings while simultaneously undermining the efforts of real artists.

According to the indictment, Smith began working with the CEO of an undisclosed AI music firm around 2018. This co-conspirator allegedly provided Smith with thousands of AI-generated tracks each month. In exchange, Smith offered metadata such as song titles and artist names, and offered a share of streaming earnings.

One email exchange between Smith and the unnamed CEO in March 2019 demonstrates how the plot took shape. The executive stated, “Keep in mind what we’re doing musically here…this is not ‘music,’ [but] ‘instant music’).” The email emphasises the operation’s intentional nature, as well as the use of AI to generate large amounts of content with minimal effort. According to the indictment, the technology improved over time, making it harder for streaming platforms to detect fraudulent streams.

In another email dated February, Smith boasted that his AI-generated tracks had accumulated over 4 billion streams and $12 million in royalties since 2019. If convicted, Smith faces significant prison time for the charges brought against him.

The Smith case is not the only one involving bogus music streaming royalties. Earlier this year, a Danish man received an 18-month term for a similar plan. Music streaming platforms like Spotify, Apple Music and YouTube forbid bots and artificial streams from being used to boost royalties. Such behaviour is disruptive and illegal, and platforms have taken steps to combat it through policy changes. For instance, if artificial streams are detected, Spotify charges the label or distributor and music can earn royalties only if it meets certain criteria.

Nevertheless, the proliferation of AI-generated music continues to disrupt the music industry. Musicians and record companies fear they will lose revenue and recognition due to AI tools capable of creating music, text and images. Such tools reportedly sometimes use content that musicians and other creators have posted on the internet, raising questions about copyright infringement.

Tension came to a head in 2023 when a track that mimicked the voices of popular artists Drake and The Weeknd went viral, prompting streaming platforms to remove it. Earlier this year, several high-profile musicians, including Billie Eilish, Elvis Costello and Aerosmith, signed an open letter urging the music industry to address the “predatory” use of AI to generate content.

(Photo by israel palacio)

See also: Whitepaper dispels fears of AI-induced job losses

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

The post AI and bots allegedly used to fraudulently boost music streams appeared first on AI News.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI 音乐诈骗 音乐流媒体 AI 技术 版权侵犯
相关文章