少点错误 2024年09月04日
A Comparison Between The Pragmatosphere And Less Wrong
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了Pragmatosphere和LessWrong两个理性主义运动的特点及差异,包括创立时间、规模、信仰等方面,并对LessWrong提出了一些观察和批评。

🎯Pragmatosphere规模较小,追随者信仰较为统一;LessWrong规模较大,是大帐篷运动,追随者的信仰并非完全重叠。

🚫LessWrong存在一些问题,如对生物学现实主义的忽视、对技术的过度乐观、对某些重要理论的缺乏意识等。

💡作者认为通往理性社区的关键是认识到哲学中没有理所当然的假设,而LessWrong论坛虽旨在促进理性,却存在一些问题。

Published on September 4, 2024 9:39 AM GMT

The Pragmatosphere and Less Wrong both share rationalism as a fundamental characteristic of their philosophies. Less Wrong was founded by Eliezer Yudkowsky in 2009, whereas the Pragmatosphere was founded by Blithering Genius in 2013. The Pragmatosphere is much smaller, so its followers have more unified beliefs. By contrast, Less Wrong is a big tent movement and is much larger. So although there’s a lot of beliefs and ideas associated with Less Wrong, not all of its followers perfectly overlap in their beliefs.

There are many differences and disagreements between the two rationalist movements. The following observations and criticisms apply towards Less Wrong, from the perspective of the Pragmatosphere. Since Less Wrong is a big tent as aforementioned, not all of these criticisms necessarily apply to every LessWronger. Some of these criticisms also highlight things that we wish had more emphasis within Less Wrong and related movements, so they may not necessarily be disagreements.

The gateway to a rational community is the Abyss, the recognition that are no assumptions that we can take for granted in philosophy. Even though the Less Wrong forum was created to focus on promoting rationality, it’s mostly a faction of people who are preoccupied with AI misalignment, futurism, and effective altruism. We believe that they’re confusing their unexamined assumptions for rationality, as most people do. Eliezer Yudkowsky is justified in criticizing mainstream academic philosophy since most of it is frankly garbage, but I don’t believe that the philosophy that he’s created is much better, for all the reasons that I’ve stated here.

Ayn Randian Objectivists also claim and think they are rationalists, but I have a low opinion about them and their philosophy. In my experience, most Randian Objectivists merely parrot Ayn Rand quotes, while choosing to not think for themselves. The average LessWronger is definitely more rational, intelligent, and open-minded than the average Objectivist.

Even though The Pragmatosphere and Less Wrong claim and believe they are rationalist, they both propose remarkably different theories of epistemology. The beliefs, values, and priorities for humanity that both movements hold are also extraordinarily different from each other. We encourage more Less Wrongers to read and think about the works of the Pragmatosphere, but we also believe it’s unlikely that the two rational movements will ever merge to any great extent. Most of my posts on LessWrong haven’t gotten a lot of attention, and the ones that transgress the forum’s moral boundaries received a lot of downvotes. The effective altruism forum also banned me without giving me any warning or notice as to why I was banned.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Pragmatosphere LessWrong 理性主义 差异 思考
相关文章