文章探讨了AI生成内容在LW及多数在线论坛可能成为常态，提出应关注减少危害或创造实际价值，还设想了LW特定的工作流程，以辅助相关内容创作，但作者自身未提供示例，希望大家讨论。

🎯AI生成内容在LW及多数在线论坛可能成为永久性特征，人们似乎有此需求，所以应考虑如何降低其可能带来的危害或创造实际价值。

💡作者设想LW特定的工作流程，利用主要平台协助创作LW问题、研究总结帖、理性探索问题帖等内容，并提出一些示例提示，如如何生成和使用总结段落等。

🙋作者表示自己虽尝试过相关技术，但都是在自身思考中进行，未使用外部工具，也没有提供起始示例，希望其他人能提供。

Published on August 21, 2024 4:41 PM GMT

Based on low-quality articles that seem to be coming up with more regularity, and as mentioned in a few recent posts, AI-generated posts are likely to be a permanent feature of LW (and most online forums, I expect).  I wonder if we should focus on harm reduction (or actual value creation, in some cases) rather than trying to disallow something that clearly people want to do.

I wonder how feasible it would be to have a LessWrong-specific workflow for using any or all of the major platforms to assist with (and not fully write) a LW question, a LW summary-of-research post, or a LW rationalist-exploration-of-a-question post (and/or others).  This could simply be a help page with sample prompts for "how to generate and use a summary paragraph", "how to generate and modify an outline/thesis sketch", and "how to use the summary and outline to flesh out your ideas on a subtopic".

I've played with these techniques, but I tend to do it all in my captive meatware LLM rather than using an external one, so I don't have a starter example.  Do any of you?

Discuss