Palo Alto Networks Blog 2024年08月07日
Attack Vectors at a Glance
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章介绍了网络攻击向量及防范方法,包括软件漏洞、被盗凭证、第三方与错误配置等方面,并强调了采取相应防范措施的重要性。

🧐软件漏洞是组织的薄弱点,攻击者常利用面向互联网的应用获取初步立足点。软件漏洞发现滞后,厂商安全更新不及时,工程师测试补丁需时间,而有组织的攻击者会利用AI扩大攻击规模。建议主动发现分析资产,利用工具查找修复漏洞,融入威胁情报,进行常规测试并尽快实施补丁。

🔑被盗凭证是常见攻击手段,攻击者通过多种方式获取,如对客服人员进行社交工程、窃取或购买个人凭证等。建议采用能应对人为错误的技术,监测网络异常行为,训练团队防范社交工程,采用多因素认证并教育用户注意相关风险。

🚪第三方与错误配置会增加风险,威胁来自过度信任第三方及无文档标准的设备部署。建议采用零信任网络访问框架,定期扫描分析组织的错误配置,用技术方法执行相关政策。

Executive Insights from the Unit 42 Incident Response Report

An attack vector is the method an attacker uses to get access to a target environment. Understanding which vectors result in the most successful attacks can help you reduce the likelihood an attacker succeeds at compromising your organization.

The 2024 Incident Response Report details the most exploited attack vectors of the past year. It also spotlights the cybercriminal group known as Muddled Libra and analyzes its most successful attack patterns to determine how the most sophisticated attackers may attempt to breach your defenses.

When hardening defenses against cyberattacks, it’s important to understand the interplay between the who and the how. While you need to identify the most likely threats to your organization, you also need to identify how threat actors exploit common attack vectors.

Preventing and responding to attacks requires threat-informed defenses. By examining threat actors and their behaviors, we’re able to identify the most common attack vectors and recommend strategies for securing them. Here’s what our experts have seen in this year’s Incident Response Report to help your organization better resist attacks.

Trending Attack Vectors

Cybercriminals will seek the path of least resistance when infiltrating your organization. While software vulnerabilities continue to provide attackers with alluring entry points, it’s important to remember that sophisticated attacks often involve the exploitation of multiple attack vectors.

1. Software Vulnerabilities

In most of the cases we examined, cybercriminals exploited internet-facing applications to gain an initial foothold.

Software vulnerabilities have always been a weak spot for organizations for a few reasons:

Organized groups, like Muddled Libra, have their own research and development teams. They uncover software vulnerabilities and build automated tools for discovering potential targets. Now that they’ve infused AI into their operations, they find software bugs, locate vulnerable targets, and exploit them on a much greater scale.

Our Recommendation:

Proactive discovery and analysis of your assets, especially those exposed to the internet, is the first step. A tool like Cortex Xpanse can help you proactively find and fix exposures on your internet-connected assets before attackers can exploit them.

You’ll also want to incorporate threat intelligence into your security operations. Your team can subscribe to various threat intel feeds and keep up with threat research for the latest vulnerability disclosures.

As always, routine testing and implementing patches as quickly as possible will reduce the likelihood that your software will provide an open door for attackers.

2. Stolen Credentials

Think of your cyber environment as a maze of locked doors. Your employees have the keys to unlock these doors. However, the burden of keeping up with those keys and who has them compounds as your company grows.

Attackers like Muddled Libra aren’t going to pick your locks when they can steal keys from your employees instead. In the past year, they’ve successfully employed several tactics:

Our Recommendation:

Most importantly, you must implement technologies that can account for human error. Even the best employees have bad days, and your technology should support them when their senses fail. Monitor the traffic on your network for uncommon behavior. Look for detection and response tools that can answer questions about who, what, when and where attacker activity might be. They should identify anomalous behavior and consider augmenting them with security operations tools that integrate and automate your SOC processes.

You should also train your team to detect and respond to social engineering attempts. Unlike many hacker groups, we believe members of Muddled Libra speak English natively. This allows them to more believably pass as a member of your staff in a phishing attempt. Your employees should know what an attempted attack looks like, how to react, and who to contact if they think they’ve fallen victim.

Multifactor authentication (MFA) can reduce the risk of stolen credentials, but MFA solutions can also be compromised, too. Train your users not to approve MFA requests they didn’t solicit and to report lost or stolen devices.

3. Third Parties and Misconfigurations

Third-party vulnerabilities and misconfigurations can contribute to lack of visibility. Muddled Libra and other groups exploit these vectors to gain easy access and move laterally. In contrast to the locked-door analogy, these are doors left ajar. 

Threats can come about when partner organizations grant too much trust and access to third-party vendors without oversight. Defending your organization is hard enough, but incorporating third-party vendors multiplies your attack surface. 

Misconfigurations occur when tools and devices are deployed without documented standards and procedures. They present even greater risk without ongoing monitoring and maintenance to ensure they remain secure. They then become invisible holes in your defenses for attackers to pivot through.

Our Recommendation:

Adopt a Zero Trust network access framework to mitigate the risk of anyone or anything accessing your organizational resources. Zero Trust isn’t a tool. It’s a philosophy and a full ecosystem of controls that implement best-practice security across your entire organization.

You should also regularly scan and analyze your organization for misconfigurations that might lead to compromise. While policies should dictate who can add what to the network and how it should be configured, you need technology-based methods to enforce them.

The Bigger Picture

Attack vectors are just one consideration when securing your organization. In many cases, the how can be derived from the who – who you are, how large your organization is, what industry you’re in, and who your threat actors most likely are.

We study groups like Muddled Libra and their methodologies so we can better inform you about their activities. The tactics used by well-resourced threat groups represent the attacks that future commodity cybercriminal groups will leverage against people on an automated basis.

Our best advice: don’t go at it alone. Security teams should never rely solely on their own security assessments. Talk to Unit 42 and find a trusted security partner who can identify your weaknesses and help you fix them.

The post Attack Vectors at a Glance appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

网络攻击向量 软件漏洞 被盗凭证 第三方风险
相关文章