少点错误 2024年08月04日
Thoughts On Democracy
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨社会治理问题,指出立法和陪审团决策过程的差异,民主决策可能受多种因素影响,而法院系统的决策则避免利益冲突等,还提到人们很少质疑这种差异,认为民主立法应更像司法系统。

🎯文章指出社会治理是古老哲学问题,虽无完美解决腐败的方案,但有一些实用原则可遵循以创造更好社会。

💡阐述了立法和陪审团决策过程的显著不同。民主中立法决策可基于多种因素,且由选举决定人员;而法院系统决策需避免利益冲突等,人员通过随机选择。

🤔提出人们很少质疑立法和法院系统决策过程的差异,除陪审团随机选择看似更公平外,作者认为两者决策过程应更相似。

❓思考强调理性、逻辑和无党派的系统可能出现的问题,以及受多种不良因素影响的决策系统可能产生的众多错误。

Published on August 4, 2024 6:02 AM GMT

How to govern society is one of the oldest philosophical problems, and while there aren’t any perfect solutions that can completely eliminate corruption, there are some pragmatic principles and heuristics that we can follow to generate a better society.

It is peculiar how the legislative and jury processes are so radically different from each other. In a democracy, decisions are allowed to be based on partisanship, emotions, conflicts of interest, and personal morals. And that’s even strongly encouraged. The selection process for the people who make legislative decisions regarding society is also determined by election campaigns and voting.

On the other hand, the decision-making process in the court system is completely different. People are forbidden from being selected to make decisions if they have a conflict of interest in deciding the verdict, or if they are likely to be influenced by their emotions, morals, and personal biases. In addition, the selection process for the people who make decisions is also determined by random selection (sortition), in contrast to the voting system used by democracies.

It’s odd that most people never question why these decision making processes are so different from each other. Yes, they belong to different branches of government, but they are both making important decisions about society. Besides the appeal that a random selection of people on the jury can seem more fair and unbiased, I can’t think of many other reasons why the decision-making processes for the legislature and court system should be much different from each other.

How many things can go wrong with a system that emphasizes reason, logic, and non-partisanship? On the other hand, you could easily imagine thousands of different ways how a system that allows emotions, partisanship, non-thorough evaluation of the evidence, and conflicts of self-interest to influence the decision making could go wrong. Democratic legislatures should work more similarly to the judicial system.

(see the rest of the post in the link)



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

社会治理 立法决策 法院系统 决策差异
相关文章