少点错误 2024年07月26日
Does robustness improve with scale?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了大型语言模型在分类任务中的对抗性漏洞问题,通过实验发现单纯增大模型规模并不能显著提高模型的鲁棒性,而大型模型通过对抗性训练等防御措施能获得比小型模型更佳的改善效果。

🔍 文章针对大型语言模型在分类任务中的对抗性漏洞进行了深入研究,特别是在垃圾邮件检测和电影评论情感分类等任务上进行了评估。

📈 研究结果表明,模型规模的大小并不是提高对抗性鲁棒性的关键因素,大型模型在对抗性训练等防御措施下表现更佳。

🚧 研究采用了对抗性后缀攻击方式,即在正常提示后添加对抗性提示,以诱导模型错误分类,这种攻击方式不会改变输入的基本语义。

🛡️ 文章提出,虽然目前的攻击模型相对简单,但研究更开放的威胁模型和相应的攻击方法是未来工作的一个重要方向。

Published on July 25, 2024 8:55 PM GMT

Adversarial vulnerabilities have long been an issue in various ML systems. Large language models (LLMs) are no exception, suffering from issues such as jailbreaks: adversarial prompts that bypass model safeguards. At the same time, scale has led to remarkable advances in the capabilities of LLMs, leading us to ask: to what extent can scale help solve robustness? In this post, we explore this question in the classification setting: predicting the binary label of a text input. We find that scale alone does little to improve model robustness, but that larger models benefit more from defenses such as adversarial training than do smaller models.

We study models in the classification setting as there is a clear notion of “correct behavior”: does the model output the right label? We can then naturally define robustness as the proportion of the attacked dataset that the model correctly classifies. We evaluate models on tasks such as spam detection and movie sentiment classification. We adapt pretrained foundation models for classification by replacing the generative model’s unembedding layer with a randomly initialized classification head, and then fine-tune the models on each task.

We focus on adversarial-suffix style attacks: appending an adversarially chosen prompt to a benign prompt in an attempt to cause the model to misclassify the input, e.g., classify a spam email as not-spam. We consider two attacks: the state-of-the-art Greedy Coordinate Gradient method (Zou et al., 2023), and a baseline random token attack. This simple threat model has the advantage of being unlikely to change the semantics of the input. For example, a spam email is still spam even if a handful of tokens are appended to it. Of course, attackers are not limited to such a simple threat model: studying more open-ended threat models (such as rephrasing the prompt, or replacing words with synonyms) and corresponding attack methods (such as LLM generated adversarial prompts) is an important direction that we hope to pursue soon in future work.

For more information, see our blog post or paper.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

大型语言模型 对抗性漏洞 鲁棒性 防御措施
相关文章