Hypercritical 2024年07月17日
No Movie for Old Men
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章作者以父亲的身份,探讨了灾难电影《2012》中儿童遭遇危险的场景,以及这种场景对于父亲观众的特殊影响。作者认为,随着年龄的增长,尤其是为人父后,对儿童遭遇危险的场景会变得更加敏感,即使这些场景在电影中是虚构的,也会引起生理上的不适。文章还探讨了个人经历如何影响我们对艺术作品的感受,并呼吁观众在评价作品时要考虑自身的情感因素,避免过度苛责创作者或贬低观众的感受。

👨‍🍼 父亲视角下的灾难电影观影体验:文章作者以自身经历为切入点,探讨了为人父后对灾难电影中儿童遭遇危险场景的敏感度。作者认为,即使电影中儿童的遭遇是虚构的,但作为父亲,仍然会产生生理上的不适和情感上的共鸣,这种敏感度是随着年龄增长和成为父亲后逐渐产生的。

🎭 个人经历影响艺术作品观感:作者认为,个人经历会对我们对艺术作品的感受产生深远的影响。例如,经历过车祸的人可能无法享受电影中包含车祸场景的片段,有过被虐待经历的人可能对父母对孩子大吼大叫的场景感到反感。作者强调,这种情感反应并非观众“过于敏感”或“疯狂”,而是个人经历带来的真实感受。

🎬 理解观众的情感反应:作者呼吁观众在评价艺术作品时,要考虑自身的情感因素,避免过度苛责创作者或贬低观众的感受。作者认为,艺术作品的价值并非完全取决于观众的反应,但观众的感受也值得尊重。作者建议,观众要坦诚面对自身的情感反应,避免将其归咎于作品本身,而是将其视为个人经历带来的影响。

💡 父亲视角下对电影的理解:作者以自身经历为例,说明父亲视角下对电影的理解与感受。作者认为,即使电影本身质量不高,但如果它触及了父亲的内心,也会获得另一种意义上的欣赏。例如,作者虽然不喜欢《2012》这部电影,但仍然认可它在展现灾难场景和儿童遭遇危险方面的表达。

🌟 父亲视角下的电影观赏:作者认为,父亲视角下的电影观赏可以带来独特的感受和理解。作者以《The Road》这部小说为例,说明父亲视角下的电影观赏可以使电影更加感人、更具深度。作者希望《The Road》的电影改编能够保留原作的精髓,为观众带来精彩的观影体验。

2012 is an awful movie. I knew this when I added it to my Netflix queue, but I wanted to stay up to date on the latest in computer-generated apocalyptic destruction. I’m a fan of special effects in general and stories about the end of the world in particular.

All the boxes were ticked: absurd “science,” impossible escapes, a nonsensical plan to save humanity, familial and romantic problems resolved during the crisis, unintentionally slapstick character deaths, etc. What I didn’t expect was how upsetting it would be—which is to say, that it was upsetting at all.

The most heartless, lizard-brained humans are pre-teen boys. Teens and young adult men have usually built up a tough emotional core, but are generally too distracted by puberty to ever match the hardness of their unenlightened, toad-exploding youths. As men age, they become progressively more sensitive. The biggest spike (or dip?) in the graph occurs when a man becomes a father.

In my experience, this manifests itself most noticeably in a reduced ability to enjoy any story where children are in peril. And so it was for me with 2012. As bad as the movie was, I was still bothered by the repeated use of children in danger as a dramatic device. This, despite the fact that there is never any mystery about who will live and who will die in any given scene. My brain understood, but my body still twinged.

So let this be a lesson to you, young men. You may feel tough now, and you may remain rational and intelligent your entire lives. But you will age, and someday you may even become a father. When you do, watch out. You too—yes, even you, you, and you—will someday become an unintentional victim of your own emotions. (A “mush,” as I’ve heard it called.)

It’s Not You, It’s Me

I always ponder this situation when I see a movie or read a book. It seems to me that our ability to enjoy a story depends on our personal experiences to a degree that people don’t want to consider. For example, a common occurrence on this Internet of ours is to encounter an impassioned screed condemning some work of fiction as offensive. Like clockwork, this is followed by a retaliatory condemnation of the offended party as “too sensitive” or “crazy.” The phrase “give me a break” is featured.

The overall point that the inherent worth of a work of art is not determined by the bad reactions of a few people is pretty solid. But the glib denigration of the offended party is definitely on shaky ground. The unfortunate truth is that, through no fault of the artist or the viewer, entire avenues of entertainment can be closed off by life experiences.

If your wife died in a car accident, you may find yourself unable to enjoy movies that feature car crashes. If you had an abusive parent, you may be upset by any scene where a parent yells at a child. And yes, if you simply have one or more happy, healthy children, you may not even be able to smirk your way through a comically bad disaster movie which happens to feature children.

None of this has to reach the level of trauma (e.g., a veteran being unable to watch war movies). In fact, it’s most insidious when it’s much less dramatic, just a mild pin-prick of discomfort happening entirely outside—and often in opposition to—your conscious mind.

And is this the fault of the artist? Is the comedy actually less funny because there’s a gag involving turbulence on an airplane? And on the other side, can you really blame the viewer? I say no on all counts, as long as everyone involved has a clear head about the situation. For the viewer, that means no blanket denunciation of a work of art based solely on your own unexamined emotional reaction. For the artist, that means understanding that some people will be legitimately upset by your creation for reasons beyond your ability to predict or control.

So yeah, thumbs down on 2012, but not because I’m a father of two and a giant mush. It’s bad for all the usual reasons a movie is bad: script, story, characters, etc. Maybe if you don’t have kids, you can appreciate it as a "good ‘bad movie.’" Maybe.

Finally, lest you young men get depressed about your inevitable futures as wussy old(er) men, there is actually an upside. A good movie that happens to intersect with your newly altered emotional landscape can be made all the more better by the interaction. For example, I enjoyed reading The Road, which is a much more intense story of the apocalypse and a child in danger than 2012. Here’s hoping the movie adaptation doesn’t suck.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

灾难电影 父亲视角 情感体验 艺术作品 个人经历
相关文章