Astral Codex Ten Podcast feed 2024年07月17日
Adversarial Collaboration Contest Results
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了教育体系是否满足资优学生的需求,通过分析不同的教育干预措施,提出了对现行教育体系的评价和改进建议。同时,文章也讨论了关于跨性别儿童、儿童疫苗接种、伊斯兰教与自由民主兼容性等话题,并给出了奖项分配的说明。

🎓 教育体系服务资优学生:文章通过大量研究,分析了教育体系在服务资优学生方面的不足,提出了改进措施,但存在焦点不集中的问题。

🌈 跨性别儿童话题:文章深入探讨了跨性别儿童是否应该进行性别转换的问题,全面呈现了正反两方面的证据,但在讨论青春期阻断剂的副作用时存在疏忽。

💉 儿童疫苗接种:文章提及了儿童疫苗接种的必要性,但未详细展开讨论。

🌍 伊斯兰教与自由民主:文章简要讨论了伊斯兰教与自由民主是否兼容的问题,但未深入分析。

🏆 奖项分配:作者对奖项的分配进行了调整,以确保平衡各方偏好,并对Patreon支持者表示感谢。

Grand Prize ($1000): Does The Education System Adequately Serve Advanced Students?

Editor’s Choice ($500): Should Transgender Children Transition?

Honorable Mentions ($250): Should Childhood Vaccination Be Mandatory?Are Islam And Liberal Democracy Compatible?

I’m sorry for jerking the number and value of the prizes around so many times, but I wanted to balance my preferences, the contestants’ preferences, and readers’ preferences – and this was the best way I could think of to do it. Nobody has gotten less money than they expected, although some prize categories have gotten more money than I originally said. In the end I could not in good conscience let any of these escape without getting a prize. Thanks to this blog’s Patreon supporters for making this possible. All winners should email me with their preferred form of payment (I can do Paypal, Bitcoin, or donations to a charity of their choice).

The overwhelming winner of the popular vote was the collaboration on education. I agree this one was excellent. It cited a lot of research, analyzed it very well, and mostly came to conclusions. Its only flaw from my perspective was a lack of focus; it discussed many different educational interventions, some of which were similar enough that it was hard for me to keep track of what was going on.

I chose the collaboration on transgender children. I thought it did an exceptional job of addressing a specific hot-button issue many people are concerned about, presenting all the evidence on both sides, and mostly coming to conclusions. My strongest complaint was that it ignored some of the potential side effects of puberty blockers which commenters pointed out, and sort of trivialized bone problems that are not trivial; given that the side effects of puberty blockers was a major crux of this question, I found that to be a major weakness. I was still very impressed with the piece’s ability to break down and navigate such a controversial question.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

教育体系 资优学生 跨性别儿童 疫苗接种 伊斯兰教
相关文章