Astral Codex Ten Podcast feed 2024年07月17日
Instead Of Pledging To Change The World, Pledge To Change Prediction Markets
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国总统拜登承诺到2030年将美国的排放量减少一半,但历届政府的承诺往往难以兑现。文章提出,如果拜登承诺通过一系列立法行动,使预测市场对其减排目标有超过50%的信心,那么这将是一种更可靠的承诺方式。

🌍 **历史承诺的不可靠性**:历届政府虽有减排承诺,但往往未能实现,如澳大利亚、巴西和加拿大均未达成目标。

📈 **预测市场的概念**:使用预测市场如Metaculus来评估政府承诺实现的可能性,为政府行为提供即时反馈。

🎯 **拜登的新承诺**:文章建议拜登承诺在他的任期结束时,通过立法行动使预测市场对其2030年减排目标有超过50%的信心。

🏭 **具体行动**:为实现目标,拜登可能需要通过碳税、关闭煤电厂和补贴太阳能板等措施,逐步提高预测市场的信心水平。

🗳️ **政治影响**:如果拜登能够实现这一承诺,将对其连任产生积极影响;反之,则可能成为竞选中的不利因素。

https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/instead-of-pledging-to-change-the

 

In April, Joe Biden pledged to halve US emissions (from their 2005 max) by 2030.

This is nice, but I can't help but remember eg Australia's 2009 Copenhagen summit pledge to decrease emissions 5% by 2020 (in fact, they increased 17%). Or Brazil's pledge at the same summit to cut emissions 38% by 2020 (in fact, they increased 45%). Or Canada's pledge for -20% (they got +1%). I'm not cherry-picking bad actors here, I'm just going through the alphabet (pledges sourceoutcomes source) . For that matter, what about George W. Bush's pledge to return Americans to the moon by 2020?

All of these pledges have one thing in common - they expire long after the relevant officials are out of power (and in Biden's case, probably dead). As hard as it is to hold politicians accountable in normal situations, it's even worse here. Sure enough, prediction aggregator Metaculus shows that forecasters only give a 15% chance that we reach Biden's emissions target by 2030.

What if instead of pledging anything about emissions, Biden pledged to shift the prediction aggregator?

No, seriously, hear me out. Biden pledges that by the end of his term, Metaculus will predict a 51%+ chance that emissions will be less than half their historic maximum by 2030. If Metaculus gives a lower number than this, we can consider Biden to have failed in his pledge, and we can hold it against him when he tries to get re-elected.

In order to get Metaculus (or some alternative prediction market) to show a 51% chance of meeting emissions targets, Biden would have to pass a credible package of legislation that puts us on the path to achieving that goal, and makes everyone think it’s more likely than not.

Imagine Biden pledges that some prediction market will have a 51% chance of reaching his 2030 emissions target by the time he leaves office. He passes a carbon tax, and the market shoots up from 15% to 30%. Now he knows he’s on the right track, but still has to do more. So he bans a bunch of coal power plants, and it goes up to 45%. He's still not quite there, so he gives big subsidies to solar panels a few days before the campaign season kicks off, the prediction market reaches 51%, and he's able to say he fulfilled his pledge.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

拜登 减排承诺 预测市场 立法行动
相关文章