Hidden Forces feed 2024年07月17日
What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters | Steven Koonin
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本期播客讨论了气候科学的现状,以及人类应对气候变化的挑战。作者斯蒂芬·库宁教授认为,气候科学存在着不确定性,我们不能简单地将气候变化视为“末日”。他呼吁我们理性看待气候问题,并强调了数据、模型预测以及政策制定中需要考虑的各种因素。

🤔 **气候科学的“不确定性”**: 作者斯蒂芬·库宁教授认为,气候科学存在着“不确定性”,我们不能简单地将气候变化视为“末日”。他指出,许多关于气候变化的预测模型存在着误差,例如,对未来气温升高的预测,以及对极端天气事件的预测,都存在着很大的不确定性。

📈 **数据、模型预测与政策制定**: 播客中详细讨论了气候变化相关的数据和模型预测,包括未来气温升高、干旱、森林火灾、飓风、海平面上升、气候移民以及气候变化导致的疾病传播等。作者认为,这些数据和模型预测为我们制定应对气候变化的政策提供了重要依据。

💰 **经济成本与社会效益**: 播客还讨论了应对气候变化的经济成本和社会效益。作者强调,我们需要权衡各种因素,例如,减少温室气体排放的成本,以及气候变化带来的潜在损失,才能制定出最有效的应对策略。

💡 **科技创新与可持续发展**: 播客中提到了应对气候变化的科技创新,例如,碳捕获技术、太阳能、风能和核能等。作者认为,这些科技创新能够帮助我们减少温室气体排放,并实现可持续发展。

🌎 **全球合作与共同行动**: 播客强调,应对气候变化需要全球合作。作者认为,各国需要共同努力,制定有效的国际协议,并共同推进科技创新,才能有效地应对气候变化的挑战。

In Episode 187 of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with Steven Koonin, author of “Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters.” Dr. Koonin serves as Director of NYU's Center for Urban Science and Progress. He previously served as Undersecretary for Science in the U.S. Department of Energy under Barack Obama and as Chief Scientist at BP, where he was a strong advocate for research into renewable energies and alternative fuel sources.

The science of climate change has become, like almost everything else, a matter of political identity in 21st century America. A recent Pew Research study found that Democrats are more than three times as likely as Republicans to say that dealing with climate change should be a top priority. And yet, if you ask people independent of party affiliation for their views on climate change and why they believe what they believe, most of them will struggle to give you a coherent answer. In fact, very few people, and this goes for politicians, journalists, and even academics, have actually read the reports put out by organizations like the IPCC and others responsible for doing the actual research that we all cite when we talk about “the science.” And to be honest, can you blame them? Afterall, why would anyone want to spend a minute of their time learning about exactly why we are so screwed? About how we’ve destroyed the planet and “broken the climate?” 

We’ve read all the headlines. “Climate Catastrophe.” “Climate Disaster.” “The earth is burning!” But how true is this, exactly? Are we really facing a “Climate Apocalypse?” Is climate science really “more reliable than physics,” something that journalist David Wallace-Wells said in a recent appearance on the Joe Rogan Podcast. Not according to my guest, but more importantly, not according to the science, which, to borrow from the book’s title, is very much “Unsettled.”

Before you react to that very provocative book title, you should know that no one is saying climate change is a hoax or that anthropogenic warming isn’t real. The purpose of this conversation is not to surreptitiously undermine the consensus view or to troll those who believe strongly in it. Rather, it is simply meant to help inform those of you who either haven’t read the reports or are simply skeptical about just how bad the situation is and what’s required from us in order to solve it. This is a subject that deeply concerns all of us, but the doom and gloom narrative surrounding it has arguably become counterproductive in helping us actually address the problem.

Steven and Demetri spend two hours—between the first half and the overtime—working their way through the data, what it says, and what the models predict about not only future warming, but also the incidences of droughts, forest fires, hurricanes, rising sea levels, climate-induced migration, and pandemics driven by a warming planet. 

In the subscriber overtime, they focus most of their attention on the incentives that account for these widely divergent narratives on climate, the importance of morals and values in thinking about how to structure climate policy, and the missing components of costs and tradeoffs that we all need to think about when coming to decisions on how best to adapt our societies and ourselves to the changing climate.

Kofinas and Koonin also discuss geoengineering, including carbon extraction and the use of aerosols to dampen the sun’s rays, as well as alternative sources of energy like wind, solar, and nuclear, and their respective roles as alternatives to fossil fuels in the coming decades.

You can access the episode overtime, as well as the transcript and rundown to this week’s episode through the Hidden Forces Patreon Page. All subscribers gain access to our overtime feed, which can be easily added to your favorite podcast application.

If you enjoyed listening to today’s episode of Hidden Forces you can help support the show by doing the following:

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher | SoundCloud | YouTube | CastBox | RSS Feed

Write us a review on Apple Podcasts

Subscribe to our mailing list through the Hidden Forces Website

Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas

Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou

Subscribe & Support the Podcast at https://patreon.com/hiddenforces

Join the conversation on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @hiddenforcespod

Follow Demetri on Twitter at @Kofinas

Episode Recorded on 04/12/2021

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

气候变化 气候科学 不确定性 政策制定 可持续发展
相关文章