Decoding the Gurus 2024年07月17日
Interview with Worobey, Andersen & Holmes: The Lab Leak
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

新冠病毒的起源问题,究竟是源自动物传播还是实验室泄漏,至今仍存在争议。尽管多数专家倾向于自然溢出,但公众舆论却偏向实验室泄漏。该观点的传播得益于主流和社交媒体的热烈讨论,许多知名人士坚信新冠病毒来自实验室。为了解开谜团,本期节目邀请了三位病毒学家,他们以其在病毒学领域的专业知识和经验,对实验室泄漏论进行了深入分析。

🦠 **专家观点:**三位病毒学家,包括斯克里普斯研究所的克里斯蒂安·安德森教授、亚利桑那大学的迈克尔·沃罗贝教授和悉尼大学的埃德蒙德·霍姆斯教授,在各自领域拥有丰富的经验和专业知识,他们对新冠病毒起源的研究成果发表在《自然》和《科学》等顶级期刊上。他们对实验室泄漏论进行了详细分析,认为没有充分证据支持该观点。 专家们指出,新冠病毒的基因序列与自然界中存在的蝙蝠冠状病毒非常相似,这表明它可能起源于自然界。此外,他们还强调,新冠病毒的传播模式与实验室泄漏并不相符。 他们还驳斥了实验室泄漏论者的某些观点,例如,他们认为新冠病毒具有不自然的特征,这其实是因为病毒在自然界中不断进化和变异的结果。他们还指出,新冠病毒的基因序列非常复杂,不可能是人为制造的。

🧬 **自然溢出:** 专家们认为,新冠病毒很可能起源于自然界,通过动物传播到人类。他们指出,新冠病毒的基因序列与自然界中存在的蝙蝠冠状病毒非常相似,这表明它可能起源于蝙蝠。此外,他们还发现,新冠病毒的传播模式与动物传播更吻合。 专家们推测,新冠病毒很可能通过中间宿主传播到人类。他们认为,新冠病毒可能首先感染了某种动物,例如果子狸或穿山甲,然后通过这些动物传播到人类。 专家们还指出,新冠病毒的传播速度非常快,这表明它可能已经适应了人类,这与实验室泄漏并不相符。

🌍 **科学传播:**专家们强调,科学研究需要严谨的证据和理性的分析,不应该被情绪和偏见所左右。他们呼吁公众要理性看待新冠病毒起源问题,不要轻信未经证实的传言。 他们指出,实验室泄漏论缺乏充分的证据支持,而且它可能会导致不必要的恐慌和社会混乱。他们认为,科学研究应该以客观事实为基础,而不是基于猜测和臆测。 专家们还强调,科学家们应该保持开放和透明的态度,积极与公众进行沟通,让公众了解科学研究的进展和成果。

🧪 **科学证据:** 专家们表示,他们已经对新冠病毒进行了大量的研究,并获得了大量的科学证据。这些证据表明,新冠病毒起源于自然界,而不是实验室泄漏。 他们还指出,实验室泄漏论的支持者并没有提供任何可信的证据来支持他们的观点。他们认为,实验室泄漏论是一种阴谋论,它缺乏科学依据。 专家们呼吁公众要理性看待科学研究,不要被一些不负责任的传言所误导。他们认为,科学研究应该以客观事实为基础,而不是基于猜测和臆测。

🕵️ **继续探索:**尽管专家们认为新冠病毒起源于自然界,但他们也承认,还需要进一步的研究来确定新冠病毒的具体起源。他们表示,他们将继续进行研究,以找到更多关于新冠病毒起源的证据。 专家们还表示,他们希望公众能够理解科学研究是一个不断探索和发现的过程。他们认为,科学研究需要时间和耐心,不能急于求成。 专家们还呼吁公众要积极参与科学研究,为科学研究提供支持。他们认为,科学研究需要全社会的共同努力,才能取得更大的突破。

The question of the SARS-CoV-2 origin: whether it was a zoonotic spillover from a wet market, or an engineered virus that escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, is seemingly a debate that will never go away. Most interestingly, while scientists with specific domain expertise seem to be building a consensus towards the former, public opinion appears to be trending towards the latter. This delta between expert and popular opinion has been helped along by the frothy discourse in mainstream and social media, with most figures that we cover in this podcast dead-set certain that it came from a lab.

Most recently, Sam Harris hosted on his Making Sense podcast the molecular biologist Alina Chan and. science writer Matt Ridley, spokespersons for the lab leak case, and authors of "Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19". To a layperson, and certainly to Sam, they put forward a rather watertight case. Intrinsic to the arguments advanced were the ideas that (a) experts in the area were refusing to engage with and unable to answer their arguments, and (b) a strong implication that there is a conspiracy of silence among virologists not just in China but internationally, to suppress the lab leak hypothesis.

So, as a case study in the public understanding of science, it seems like a pretty pickle indeed. To help unravel the pickle(?) in this somewhat special episode, we are joined by three virologists who are amply qualified to address the topic; both in terms of the evidence and whether they are involved in a conspiracy of silence.

Kristian Andersen is a Professor in the Department of Immunology and Microbiology at Scripps Research. He focuses on the relationship between host and pathogen, using sequencing, fieldwork, experimentation, and computational biology methods. He has spearheaded large international collaborations investigating the emergence, spread and evolution of deadly pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, Zika virus, Ebola virus, West Nile virus, and Lassa virus.

Prof Michael Worobey, is the head of the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona. His work focuses on the genomes of viruses, using molecular and computational biology, to understand the origins, emergence and control of pandemics. Recently, his interdisciplinary work on SARS-CoV-2 has shed light on how and when the virus originated and ignited the COVID-19 pandemic in China and how SARS-CoV-2 emerged and took hold in North America and Europe.

Prof Edward "Eddie" Holmes, is an NHMRC Leadership Fellow & Professor of Virology at the Faculty of Medicine and Health at Sydney University, a member of the Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science and a Fellow of The Royal Society. He is known for his work on the evolution and emergence of infectious diseases, particularly the mechanisms by which RNA viruses jump species boundaries to emerge in humans and other animals. He has studied the emergence and spread of such pathogens as SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, dengue virus, HIV, hepatitis C virus, myxoma virus, RHDV and Yersinia pestis.

All three researchers have specialist expertise and decades of experience directly applicable to tracking viruses and their adaption to humans, and, fair to say, are fairly eminent in their fields (Eddie in particular!). Further, they are among the relatively small set of researchers collecting and analysing primary evidence on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, communicating their findings in top-ranked journals, including Nature and Science.

In this episode, Chris and Matt put to this trio of Professors the claims raised by lab leak advocates to see what these (damn conspirators) experts have to say for themselves.

Links


Relevant Research Papers & Letters


Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

新冠病毒 病毒起源 实验室泄漏 自然溢出 科学研究
相关文章