Decoding the Gurus 2024年07月17日
Interview with Jonathan Howard on Covid Contrarians
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

新冠疫情期间,一些自称独立思考的医生和专家,以反主流姿态质疑主流观点,引发争议。本期节目邀请神经病学和精神病学教授Jonathan Howard,他不仅治疗病人,还持续记录和驳斥这些反主流观点。节目探讨了反主流声音是否真的提供独立思考,并以Joe Rogan和RFK Jr.事件为例,分析了反主流言论的影响和对科学的误导。

🦠 **反主流声音的兴起:** 新冠疫情期间,一些拥有相关资格的医生和专家,以“独立思考”的姿态,质疑主流观点,并挑战疫苗接种的必要性。这些声音通常出现在非主流播客中,例如Vinay Prasad、Jay Bhattacharya和John Campbell等。

🩺 **Jonathan Howard教授的观点:** Jonathan Howard教授认为,这些反主流声音并未提供真正的独立思考。他长期致力于记录和驳斥这些观点,并认为它们会导致误导和危险。

🎙️ **Joe Rogan和RFK Jr.事件:** 最近,Joe Rogan对RFK Jr.的言论表示认同,并引发了对疫苗科学家的攻击。这事件再次凸显了反主流声音的潜在危害,以及对科学的误导。

🧠 **反主流言论的影响:** 反主流言论可能导致公众对科学的信任下降,并影响公共卫生政策的制定和执行。这将对疫情防控和社会健康造成负面影响。

🧪 **科学的辩论:** 科学是一个不断探索和发展的过程,需要理性的讨论和证据支持。反主流声音应该以科学证据为基础,而不是情绪化的表达。

🗣️ **理性与批判:** 鼓励公众对信息保持理性批判的态度,并从多个角度获取信息,以避免被误导和影响。

📚 **了解更多:** 了解Jonathan Howard教授的著作和文章,了解更多关于新冠疫情和反主流声音的真相。

💪 **科学的价值:** 科学是人类进步的重要基石,需要我们共同维护科学的尊严和价值。

📢 **传播科学:** 积极传播科学知识,并鼓励理性思考,以抵制错误信息的传播。

🌍 **全球合作:** 应对全球性挑战,需要全球的合作和科学的指导,以共同战胜困难。

🙏 **感谢:** 感谢Jonathan Howard教授的分享,让我们更加了解疫情期间的反主流声音,并帮助我们更好地理解科学的价值。

📈 **展望未来:** 未来,我们需要继续关注疫情的发展,并以科学为指南,共同应对挑战。

🤝 **合作共赢:** 只有通过合作和科学的指导,我们才能战胜疫情,并创造更美好的未来。

The pandemic was a confusing time with public health messages from officials and institutions that were sometimes confused, conflicting, or misrepresented and anti-vaccine misinformation being spread widely. Into this mix, a new phenomenon emerged, that of the covid contrarian. Contrarian doctors usually possessed some relevant qualifications and positioned themselves as independent critical thinkers willing to challenge the dogmas of the mainstream and take a more nuanced perspective on the claims made by anti-vaccine advocates.

These contrarian figures are the voices that you would usually hear on 'heterodox' podcasts. Figures like the medical doctor Vinay Prasad, the Stanford professor of Medicine Jay Bhattacharya, or the retired nurse, John Campbell.

But did they really offer an alternative critical perspective? Our guest today, Jonathan Howard, a practising doctor and professor of Neurology and Psychiatry, argues no. And he should know, he has spent the pandemic not only treating patients but tirelessly documenting (and refuting) the claims made by the contrarian set.

This episode is unfortunately topical due to the recent online fracas surrounding Joe Rogan's credulous promotion of RFK Jnr and the subsequent 'calls for debate' and targeted harassment of Dr Peter Hotez -a public health specialist and advocate for affordable vaccines.

In any case, we learnt a lot and enjoyed the discussion with Jonathan and hope you will too. Also covered in this episode: How many pull-ups Matt can do, why Chris is drinking a chalky green potion, and the psychology of placebos.

Links


Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

新冠疫情 反主流声音 科学 独立思考 疫苗 Joe Rogan RFK Jr. Jonathan Howard
相关文章