Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg 2024年07月17日
The clash between social justice and anti-wokeness (with Amber Dawn and Holly Elmore)
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了社会正义中一系列关键问题,包括身份政治、意见表达、道德规范的演变、取消文化以及社会正义运动的未来。作者从多个角度分析了社会正义议题的复杂性,并提出了一些值得思考的观点。

🤔 **身份政治与观点表达**: 文章首先探讨了边缘群体是否拥有独一无二的知识,以及非边缘群体是否可以对边缘群体发表意见。作者认为,边缘群体拥有独特的经验和视角,但并不意味着非边缘群体不能对这些问题发表意见。重要的是,要尊重多元的声音,并以包容的态度进行讨论。

🧐 **社会正义的复杂性**: 文章还探讨了社会正义议题的复杂性,例如,如何理解和应对身份政治、道德规范的演变、取消文化等问题。作者指出,社会正义运动需要平衡不同观点,并找到一种有效的方式来解决社会不平等问题。

🌎 **行动与责任**: 最后,文章探讨了个人和群体在社会正义运动中的责任。作者认为,每个人都有责任为建立一个更加公正平等的社会做出贡献,但同时也要避免将责任归咎于个人或群体,而应关注如何解决根本问题。

🙌 **包容与理解**: 文章强调了包容和理解的重要性。作者认为,在讨论社会正义议题时,要尊重不同观点,并以理解和包容的态度进行对话。只有通过对话和合作,才能找到解决社会不平等问题的有效途径。

✊ **行动的必要性**: 文章强调了行动的重要性。作者认为,社会正义运动需要行动,而不仅仅是讨论。我们需要采取行动来挑战不公平和歧视,并为建立一个更加公正平等的社会做出贡献。

Is it okay for anyone to have opinions about marginalized communities even if they're not a part of those communities? Do people in marginalized groups have special knowledge (especially tacit knowledge) about their groups that can't be known or experienced from the outside? To what extent can we know and empathize with others' experiences regardless of differences in race, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, etc.? Do oppression and discrimination tend to be caused more by active bigotry or by mere lack of care and awareness? What information (if any) does intersectionality fail to capture about people? Is describing someone intersectionally an end in itself, or is it just a way of correcting (or over-correcting) for the suppression of marginalized voices? Should ideas be discussed absent their context or implications (see: decoupling norms vs. contextualizing norms)? To what extent should we focus on individuals versus groups when attempting to fix inequities? Are individuals or groups responsible for redressing the atrocities of their ancestors? Should people be "cancelled" for their views (including their past views, even if their current views are different)? To what extent is the shifting of moral ground around social justice issues unpredictable and/or disorienting? How can democratic societies balance the need to debate difficult ideas with the risk of giving reprehensible ideas a platform? Should rules about offensiveness be enforced from the top down (e.g., from a government, a school administration, a company's board of directors, or even parents)? Is offense only "in the eye of the beholder"?

Amber Dawn is an itinerant UChicago PhD student working on Plato and Lucretius. She is interested in philosophy, emotions, mental health and therapy, effective altruism, ethics, gender, sex, anarchism, and social justice. You can find more about Amber on Facebook, Twitter, or Medium, or you can email her at contemplatonist@gmail.com.

Holly Elmore is an effective altruist with a background in evolutionary biology. After organizing EA groups at Harvard throughout her PhD, she left academia and conducts EA-style wild animal welfare research. She witnessed the rise of wokism from within American universities, and has followed developments in social justice culture both as an adversary and an interested amateur sociologist. You can find more about her at her blog.

Amber and Holly would like for us to remind you that the views they express in this conversation are their own and do not reflect the views held by their employers.

Staff

Music

Affiliates

[Read more]

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

社会正义 身份政治 取消文化 道德规范 行动主义
相关文章