钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知 16小时前
DeepSeek’s Parent Company Executive Caught in $160 Million Rebate Scandal With Top Broker
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项持续的调查揭露了High-Flyer量化对冲基金母公司的高管与中国招商证券(CMS)员工之间长达六年的非法返佣计划。该计划涉及挪用超过1.18亿元人民币(约合1600万美元)的券商返佣。丑闻核心人物为High-Flyer前市场主管李程和招商证券前总经理孟鹏飞。他们被指控利用券商激励计划和内部关系,将巨额交易返佣非法转移至个人账户。高返佣比例和隐秘的操作手法暴露了行业内监管的灰色地带,并引发了对行业内幕交易和利益输送的担忧。该事件也对招商证券的声誉和合规性提出了挑战。

💰 巨额返佣案情:High-Flyer量化对冲基金母公司高管与招商证券员工合谋,通过利用券商激励计划和内部关系,在六年间(2018-2023年)非法挪用超过1.18亿元人民币的交易返佣,并将资金转移至个人账户。其中,High-Flyer前市场主管李程获利约2000万元,招商证券前总经理孟鹏飞获利超8000万元,招商证券私人财富管理部门前主管刘欢也因协助被给予1000万元。

🤝 利益输送链条:为实现非法返佣,孟鹏飞安排其亲属注册为High-Flyer的独家经纪人,并将High-Flyer的交易通过招商证券指定分支机构进行,使得佣金支付给由孟鹏飞家人控制的银行账户。招商证券允许经纪人保留高达40%的佣金收入作为绩效奖金,对于High-Flyer这类高频交易大客户,返佣潜力巨大,最高可达70-80%。

⚖️ 监管与调查进展:该丑闻于2024年11月开始浮出水面,李程因涉嫌返佣欺诈被拘留。High-Flyer公司声称对任何公司层面的不当行为不知情,并表示李程的行为是个人事务。孟鹏飞为规避责任,曾试图贿赂招商证券深圳分公司负责人高翔,但高翔最终退还了金条,但仍被调查。

🔍 行业乱象与反思:此案重燃了对中国券商和资产管理行业返佣行为的审查。尽管返佣旨在激励经纪人,但直接返还给客户或第三方是明令禁止的,这种行为被视为“商业贿赂”。监管机构近年来一直在加强合规性,以减少过度的交易佣金和避免利益冲突。此事件凸显了监管在执行反返佣规则方面的挑战,尤其是在涉及个人关系和第三方代理的情况下。

🚀 High-Flyer公司背景:High-Flyer公司成立于2015年,由梁文峰创立,在中国的量化投资领域迅速崛起,并成为中国“量化四天王”之一。截至2025年6月,该公司管理规模超过600亿元人民币,并持续保持强劲的投资回报。尽管公司管理规模有所下降,但其选择性限制资本流入,专注于内部业绩,并保持了良好的收益表现。

TMTPOST -- A six-year illicit rebate scheme between a top executive at DeepSeek’s parent company High-Flyer Quant Hedge Fund and employees of China Merchants Securities (CMS), one of the country's leading brokerages, has been exposed, according to an ongoing investigation.

The scheme, which had circulated as rumors in late 2024, has now been confirmed to involve over 118 million yuan (about $16 million) in misappropriated brokerage rebates over the six years.

At the center of the scandal is Li Cheng, former Head of Marketing at High-Flyer, a quant and hedge fund, and Meng Pengfei, the ex-general manager of CMS’s Shenzhen Shennan East Road branch. The duo allegedly engineered a scheme that funneled substantial trading rebates into personal accounts by exploiting a brokerage incentive program and misusing internal connections.

According to media reports and insider sources, Li, who had previously worked at CMS, and Meng collaborated to divert performance bonuses tied to brokerage commissions. Under standard industry practices, CMS allowed brokers to retain up to 40% of commission revenues (after deducting costs) as performance bonuses.

Given High-Flyer’s status as a top-tier high-frequency trading client, the rebate potential was significant.

To channel these funds illicitly, Meng arranged for his relative to be registered as High-Flyer’s exclusive broker. High-Flyer’s trades were then routed through CMS’s designated branch, allowing commissions to be paid into bank accounts controlled by Meng’s family members. Over six years, from 2018 to 2023, the two allegedly extracted a total of about $16 million.

Approximately 20 million yuan went to Li, while Meng kept over 80 million yuan. Another 10 million yuan was reportedly given to Liu Huan, then-head of CMS’s private wealth management division, as a "thank you" for facilitating the arrangement.

The scheme began to unravel in November 2024, when Li was reportedly detained in connection with suspected rebate fraud. At the time, High-Flyer confirmed that Li was assisting authorities with an investigation but claimed no knowledge of any company-level misconduct. A spokesperson stated: “The company has never requested or authorized any rebate arrangements. If such actions occurred, they are purely personal matters.”

Meanwhile, Meng, anticipating legal consequences, allegedly approached then-head of CMS Shenzhen, Gao Xiang, offering 3 million yuan worth of gold bars in an attempt to shield himself from scrutiny. Gao initially accepted the gold but later returned it. Despite this, he was placed under investigation in May 2025 for suspected negligence and violations of party discipline.

Industry Practices Under Scrutiny

The case has reignited scrutiny of rebate practices in China's brokerage and asset management sectors. While commission rebate systems are widely used to incentivize brokers, regulators have long banned the direct return of funds to clients or third parties.

An industry insider described such rebate practices as “essentially commercial bribery,” warning that once exposed, firms and individuals are typically required to repay illicit earnings and may face criminal charges. The source also noted that commission rebate ratios in the industry can go as high as 70–80% for large institutional clients like private or public funds.

Regulators in recent years have stepped up efforts to reduce excessive trading commissions and tighten compliance rules to prevent conflicts of interest and improper fund flows.

Founded in 2015 by Liang Wenfeng, High-Flyer quickly rose to prominence in China’s quant investment world. Liang, who also founded AI research company DeepSeek, has become a well-known figure in both finance and tech circles. A graduate of Zhejiang University with a background in machine vision, Liang led High-Flyer to exceed 100 billion yuan in AUM by 2021, earning the firm a place among China’s “Quant Four Kings.”

As of June 2025, High-Flyer manages over 60 billion yuan and remains one of the largest quant firms in the country. Despite a decline in AUM, the firm is believed to have actively chosen to limit capital inflows, opting to “close the gate” and focus on internal performance.

In terms of returns, High-Flyer continues to deliver strong performance. According to data from Private Fund Rankings, the firm ranked in the top five among 10 billion-plus hedge funds over the past six months, one year, and three years as of May 2025.

The scandal is the latest in a string of compliance challenges for China Merchants Securities. In 2024, the firm was involved in a separate case involving misconduct by 63 employees. In 2025, it has continued to face regulatory scrutiny, particularly in its investment banking and derivatives businesses.

While the firm reported strong Q1 earnings—47.13 billion yuan in revenue and 23.09 billion yuan in net profit, up 10% and 7% year-over-year, respectively—the reputational damage from repeated enforcement actions may weigh heavily on investor confidence.

The High-Flyer-CMS scandal underscores the difficulties regulators face in enforcing anti-rebate rules, especially when such arrangements are hidden behind layers of personal relationships and third-party proxies.

As the boundary between finance and technology blurs, and as quant funds grow more powerful, both asset managers and brokers are likely to face tighter oversight. For regulators, financial institutions, and investors alike, the scandal serves as a reminder: transparency, internal controls, and ethical conduct are non-negotiable in a maturing capital market.

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

High-Flyer 招商证券 量化对冲基金 非法返佣 金融监管
相关文章