Mashable 18小时前
Florida jury hits Tesla with $329 million verdict in fatal autopilot crash
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

佛罗里达州陪审团裁定特斯拉对其Autopilot系统引发的一起致命车祸负有部分责任,判决特斯拉赔偿3.29亿美元。这是Autopilot技术首次在涉及死亡的案件中被判负有赔偿责任。该事件发生在2019年,一名特斯拉Model S司机在Autopilot启用状态下未能注意路况,撞上一辆停放的车辆,导致一名行人死亡。原告律师表示,特斯拉明知Autopilot仅适用于高速公路,却未限制其在其他路况下的使用,且公司高管曾宣称其性能优于人类驾驶。此次判决对特斯拉自动驾驶技术的安全性和法律风险提出了质疑,并可能引发更多相关诉讼。

💰 巨额赔偿:佛罗里达州陪审团裁定特斯拉在2019年的一起致命车祸中负有部分责任,判令赔偿3.29亿美元,包括1.29亿美元的补偿性赔偿和2亿美元的惩罚性赔偿,这是Autopilot系统首次在死亡案件中被判负有赔偿责任。

⚠️ 系统限制与实际使用:原告律师指出,特斯拉明知Autopilot系统仅设计用于封闭式高速公路,却故意未限制其在其他路况下的使用,并且公司高管曾公开宣称其驾驶性能优于人类,这被视为导致事故发生的重要因素。

⚖️ 法律与安全挑战:此次判决对特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克推广其自动驾驶技术(包括机器人出租车计划)构成了重大打击,引发了对其技术安全性和潜在法律风险的广泛担忧,并可能为未来更多与Autopilot相关的诉讼打开大门。

🚗 事故经过:事故发生在2019年,一名特斯拉Model S司机在Autopilot系统启用时,未能遵守交通规则,闯过停车标志和红灯,最终撞上一辆停在路边的车辆,导致一名行人死亡,另一人受伤。

A Florida jury has found Tesla partially liable in a fatal crash involving its Autopilot system, ordering the Elon Musk-owned company to pay $329 million in damages. The verdict marks a major legal blow for Tesla and a significant moment in the broader debate over the safety of autonomous driving technology.

This is the first case in which Tesla has been held responsible for a wrongful death as a result of its Autopilot technology, according to a Reuters expert. That said, Tesla’s driver-assist software has been linked to hundreds of crashes, enough to warrant its own Wikipedia page.

The lawsuit stemmed from a 2019 incident in which a Tesla Model S driver, reportedly not paying attention while Autopilot was engaged, blew through a stop sign and red light before slamming into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. Naibel Benavides Leon was standing next to the SUV at the time and was killed. Her former boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, survived with injuries.

A Miami federal judge has ordered Tesla to pay $129 million in compensatory damages and an additional $200 million in punitive damages to Benavides Leon’s estate and to Angulo. Per Reuters, Tesla plans to appeal the ruling.

"Today’s verdict represents justice for Naibel’s tragic death and Dillon’s lifelong injuries," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement to the Wall Street Journal. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans."

The ruling is a significant blow to Musk and Tesla, coming at a time when the billionaire is aggressively pushing to expand the company’s robotaxi initiative. As Musk works to convince investors and the public that Tesla can lead the future of autonomous driving, a $329 million verdict tied to its Autopilot system raises serious questions about the safety and legal risk of that vision and could open the company up to more Autopilot-related lawsuits in the future.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特斯拉 Autopilot 自动驾驶 车祸 法律判决
相关文章