Fortune | FORTUNE 07月30日 18:18
Silicon Valley’s billions of dollars on AI haven’t actually generated a return yet. Here’s why most companies should embrace ‘small AI’ instead
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章指出,当前大多数公司在AI应用中未能充分发挥其潜力,投资者也渴望看到AI投资的回报。作者建议企业应从构建庞大、通用的AI模型转向开发专注于特定任务的“小巧”模型。这类模型不仅成本更低、开发更快、更容易管理,还能在性能上表现出色,减少参数、数据和计算能力的需求。这种“小巧AI”的策略不仅有助于行业更安全、可持续地发展,还能为用户和投资者带来更实际的价值和投资回报,避免AI泡沫破裂。

🎯 **聚焦特定任务的模型更具价值**:文章强调,与其投入巨资开发功能庞大、意图包罗万象的AI模型,不如将精力放在解决单一问题、满足特定需求的“小巧”模型上。这种方法能创造出更强大、新颖的模型,且所需参数、数据和计算能力更少,更符合实际应用场景,也更容易为客户和企业带来切实的价值。

💰 **“小巧AI”降低成本并提升效率**:开发和训练通用型大型AI模型(如GPT-4、Gemini等)成本高昂且效果不确定。相比之下,专注于特定用例的AI模型由于需要更少的参数和数据,训练成本更低,开发周期更短,运行速度更快,且鲁棒性和性能更佳,这使得AI的部署更加经济高效,并有助于行业的可持续发展。

🌱 **“小巧AI”促进AI产业的健康发展**:文章认为,AI领域的过度炒作需要回归理性。通过开发更小、更专注的模型,企业可以在AI技术领域稳步前进,避免“大而全”模式带来的高昂成本和潜在风险。例如,Bonsai Robotics通过优化AI技术解决特定农业场景问题,以及微软将GPT技术应用于更专注的Copilot产品,都证明了“小巧AI”的巨大潜力。

💡 **“小巧AI”是AI价值落地的关键**:在AI投资回报压力下,企业需要通过更务实的路径来实现AI的价值。通过优化计算基础设施,聚焦正确的数据,企业可以最大限度地发挥AI的潜力,实现突破性成果,同时降低巨大的财务和环境成本。这种渐进式、实用化的创新模式,是AI真正改变世界的关键,也是避免AI泡沫破裂的有效途径。

For all of AI’s promise, most companies using it are not yet delivering true value—to their customers or themselves. With investors keen to finally see some ROI on their AI investments, it’s time to stop generalizing and start thinking smaller.

Instead of building epic models that aim to accomplish all feats, businesses looking to cash in on the AI gold rush should consider pivoting towards focused models that are designed for specific tasks. By attacking a singular problem with a fresh solution, innovators can create powerful, novel models that require fewer parameters, less data, and less compute power.

With billions upon billions of dollars being spent on AI engineering, chips, training, and data centers, a smaller form of AI can also allow the industry to progress more safely, sustainably, and efficiently. Furthermore, it is possible to deliver this potential in various manners— through services atop commodity generalist models, retrieval-augmented systems, low-rank adaptation, fine-tuning, and more.

What’s so bad about big AI?

Some tech enthusiasts may cringe at the word “small,” but when it comes to AI, small does not mean insignificant, and bigger is not necessarily better. Models like OpenAI’s GPT-4, Google’s Gemini, Mistral AI’s Mistral, Meta’s Llama 3, or Anthropic’s Claude cost a fortune to build, and when we look at how they perform, it’s not clear why most businesses would want to get into that game to begin with. 

Even as big players monopolize the field, their sexy, headline-making generalized foundational models seem to perform well enough on certain benchmarks, but whether this performance generalizes to actual value in terms of increased productivity or similar remains unclear.

In contrast, focused AI that answers specific use cases or pain points is cheaper, faster, and easier to build. That’s because successful AI models rely on high-quality, well-managed, and ethically sourced data, along with an understanding of how all that data impacts model performance. With this challenge integral to why over 80 percent of AI projects fail, training a more focused model requires fewer parameters and much less data and compute power.

This is not an argument for green AI but for bringing some realism back into the AI hype cycle. Even if the model itself is a large proprietary one, the tighter the focus, the smaller and more manageable the number of possible outputs to consider becomes. With less token length, models optimized for a specific task can run faster and be highly robust and more performant, all while using less data.

Delivering small AI does not need to be constraining

With AI in agriculture already valued at more than $1 billion annually, innovators like Bonsai Robotics are unlocking new efficiencies by optimizing the technology to tackle specific use cases. Bonsai employs patented AI models, powerful data, and computer-vision software to power autonomy systems for plucking and picking in harsh environments. While Bonsai’s algorithms rely on massive datasets that are being continuously updated, with its narrow focus, this physical AI trailblazer was tapped as AgTech Breakthrough’s Precision Agriculture Solution of the Year.

Even Big Tech players are working to focus their AI offerings with smaller, more powerful models. 

Microsoft currently uses OpenAI’s GPT-based technology to power Copilot, a suite of smaller AI tools built into its products. These models are more focused on software, coding, and common patterns, allowing them to be more easily fine-tuned than the general ChatGPT and better at generating personalized content, summarizing files, recognizing patterns, and automating activities via prompts.

With OpenAI projecting big returns when it releases PhD-level ChatGPT agents, the ideal is that one day, we will all have our own agents—or AI assistants—that use our personal data to act on our behalf without prompts. It’s an ambitious future, notwithstanding the privacy and security concerns. 

While the jump from where we are now to where we could be going seems to be a huge one, building it piece by piece is a clear, lower-risk approach than assuming a massive monolith is the answer.

AI innovators who home in on specificity can build a growing, nimble team of expert models that increasingly augment our work instead of one costly, mediocre assistant who is fat with parameters, eats massive data sets, and still doesn’t get it right. 

How small AI will keep the bubble from bursting 

By creating lighter computing infrastructures that focus on the right data, businesses can fully maximize AI’s potential for breakthrough results even as they cut down the immense financial and environmental costs of the technology. 

Amid all the hype around AI and the behemoth Big Tech models fighting for headlines, the long arc of innovation has always relied on incremental, practical progress. With data at the heart of the models that are indeed changing our world, small, focused AI promises faster, more sustainable, and cost-effective solutions—and in turn, offers both investors and users some much-needed ROI from AI.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI 人工智能 模型优化 成本效益 AI价值
相关文章