Contributor 前天 19:01
Is Apple’s Liquid Glass as doomed as Windows Vista?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

苹果公司在其最新的xOS操作系统测试版中重新引入了“Liquid Glass”透明化设计风格,引发了用户和观察家的广泛讨论。一些人将其与多年前备受争议的Windows Vista的Aero界面相提并论,认为这种设计降低了界面的可读性和易用性,特别是在用户自定义壁纸时。然而,文章也指出,与Vista不同,苹果的Liquid Glass主要影响的是视觉呈现而非核心功能,且苹果有能力在后续版本中进行优化。尽管如此,这一设计选择与当前用户对2000年代中期设计风格的怀旧情绪形成对比,并引发了关于苹果是否应回归自身过往设计理念的讨论。

🔍 **“Liquid Glass”设计引发两极分化评价**:苹果新操作系统测试版中的“Liquid Glass”透明化设计风格,被部分用户视为“Windows Vista做得好”,但也有不少人认为其设计“丑陋”,尤其是在用户自定义壁纸后,可读性下降,例如Safari标签页和播客应用的控制界面都受到影响。

📉 **与Windows Vista的对比及区别**:尽管部分评论将“Liquid Glass”与Windows Vista的Aero界面相提并论,认为两者都存在透明度过高的问题。但文章指出,Vista的失败根源在于其技术稳定性、兼容性问题及更严格的许可要求,而Liquid Glass主要影响的是视觉风格,不涉及功能性障碍,苹果有潜力通过后续更新解决。

🤔 **设计理念与用户期望的脱节**:苹果在此时推出“Liquid Glass”设计,与当前用户对2000年代中期设计风格(如拟物化)的怀旧情绪有所背离。文章认为,苹果或许应该回顾自身过去成功的设计,而非模仿微软的旧有风格,以满足部分用户对更具辨识度和易用性界面的期待。

💬 **苹果的战略考量与用户反馈**:文章提到,苹果的忠实用户群体中出现了对新设计细节的抱怨,这与当年iOS 7发布时的情况相似。但此次的争议更多集中在视觉风格而非核心功能,这可能被苹果视为一种可控的讨论,而非对产品稳定性和功能的质疑,例如其对Siri更新或全球监管问题的关注。

🚀 **未来发展与优化可能性**:文章认为,“Liquid Glass”设计在长期来看有被优化的可能。正如iOS 7之后苹果逐渐摆脱了“过度扁平化”的设计,未来的苹果操作系统也可能在保持一定透明度的同时,调整得更加适中,以平衡美观与实用性。

Macworld

People seem to either hate Liquid Glass or…well, the Macalope has yet to see anyone who says they love it.

Engadget’s Devindra Hardawar comes the closest in saying “Apple’s Liquid Glass is Windows Vista done well” but admits “I can’t really convince you otherwise if you think it looks ugly, as many of my Engadget colleagues do.”

Still, some people will probably unreservedly love it. On a stock iPhone using one of Apple’s standard wallpaper options, Liquid Glass is going to look great. In the store and in ads, it’s going to demo very well. The problem is going to come when people install it on their phones with their wallpaper.

But, of course, by then it’s too late. Suckers! You’re in our stats now! Haha! So many upgrades!

Apart from Hardawar, others have asked in a much less favorable tone whether Liquid Glass is Apple’s Windows Vista. Do the kids remember Windows Vista? Let us go back to January 30th of 2007 (please). The iPhone had just been unveiled, Beyonce was topping the charts with “Irreplaceable” and Microsoft had, at long last, released the successor to Windows XP, Windows Vista.

And people hated it.

So, despite having been asked several times since about other Apple OS releases by people eager for Apple to fall on its face, the question seems relevant now because Vista introduced Aero, a transparent look and feel much in the vein of Liquid Glass.

When Apple released Beta 4 of its xOS 26 operating systems last week, users found it had turned the transparency back up from the more dialed-back Beta 3. This brought no small amount of consternation to Apple observers on Mastodon.

The unfortunate thing here for Apple is that it is delivering Liquid Glass at a time when there is a fair amount of nostalgia for the design ethic of the mid-2000s.

Federico Viticci, for example, compared Pocket Casts and Apple Podcasts and, yeah, it’s hard not to agree that Podcasts’ controls are demonstrably harder to read because of the transparency. Gedeon Maheux asks if you can tell which tab in Safari is selected in a macOS Tahoe screenshot. Now, you probably can, but WHY IS IT SO HARD?

It’s not just controls that have been glassified. John Gruber notes the envelope in the Mail icon also appears to be transparent. Now, this is going to bounce off most people, but what level of exhibitionism is it when you start mailing things in clear envelopes? The Macalope doesn’t want to kink shame, but that seems unhealthy.

The unfortunate thing here for Apple is that it is delivering Liquid Glass at a time when there is a fair amount of nostalgia for the design ethic of the mid-2000s. There was no need to go full Felt (that is to say both Marker and green), but anecdotally, the Macalope can tell you that he’s heard from more than one Apple fan parched for a bit of that ol’ time skeuomorphism. Instead of going back to Microsoft’s ethic, maybe it should have gone back to its own.

Still. That’s liquid under the bridge at this point, and it doesn’t mean this is Apple’s Windows Vista. Because Vista’s real failing wasn’t Aero. Aero was just the fall guy.

IDG

Sure, Aero was hard on the eyes, but Vista’s real problems were that Windows XP was stable and entrenched and that under the blurry hood, Vista had a number of technical issues that Hardawar describes. There were driver and application incompatibilities, a longer boot time and its licensing requirements were more restrictive. You couldn’t even run Aero without a decent GPU.

Apple’s xOS operating systems have none of those issues. The Macalope fully believes this will get ironed out in the long run. Much as the iOS releases after 7 moved away from the unbearable flatness of being, subsequent OSes from Apple will likely become more opaque, despite Beta 4’s shift backwards.

Interestingly, the people complaining are, historically, some of Apple’s biggest fans. The Macalope certainly recalls the same level of complaint about the implementation details when Apple released betas of iOS 7, but maybe not as much about the validity of the effort. Liquid Glass represents a change to the look and feel of Apple’s operating systems, but not how they function. In that regard, it does almost feel like an argument the company would rather have than ones over, say, when it’s going to deliver an updated Siri or how it’s doing with any number of regulating bodies across the globe.

But, then, Smoke Bomb isn’t a great name for a new design style.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

苹果 Liquid Glass 操作系统设计 Windows Vista 用户体验
相关文章