New Yorker 8小时前
Bill McKibben on Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring”
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

雷切尔·卡森的《寂静的春天》是一部具有里程碑意义的作品,它以优美的文笔揭示了DDT等杀虫剂对环境的危害。卡森凭借其在主流文学界的声誉和扎实的科学论证,成功挑战了化工行业的攻击,引发了公众对环境问题的广泛关注,并推动了联邦政府对杀虫剂的监管。这部作品不仅标志着现代环保主义的兴起,也展现了“中产阶级”文学在严肃议题上的强大影响力,即便在作者面临个人健康挑战和行业巨大压力时,其作品的力量依然穿越时空,至今发人深省。

🌟 《寂静的春天》以其“中产阶级”的写作风格,即在严肃性与可读性之间取得平衡,成功地将复杂的环境科学问题呈现给广大读者。卡森的作品,如《海的周围》,曾长时间占据畅销书榜,显示了其在1950-60年代美国知识界的高峰时期,与《少年维特之烦恼》等作品并驾齐驱的巨大影响力。

🔬 雷切尔·卡森在撰写《寂静的春天》之前,曾是联邦渔业局的海洋生物学家,拥有深厚的科学背景。尽管在创作过程中,她一边要照顾母亲,一边还要与乳腺癌抗争,但她仍坚持完成了这部揭示杀虫剂危害的著作。她的编辑威廉·肖恩盛赞其作品“充满了美、可爱和深沉的情感”,将其提升到了文学的高度。

💥 《寂静的春天》的出版立即引来了杀虫剂行业的强烈反击,他们攻击卡森的个人生活和性别。然而,卡森凭借其卓越的写作技巧和在主流知识界的广泛影响力,成功抵御了这些攻击。最高法院大法官道格拉斯称其为“自《汤姆叔叔的小屋》以来最具革命性的书籍”,而肯尼迪总统也因此启动了科学顾问委员会的调查,最终促成了对DDT更严格的联邦监管。

🌱 卡森的工作不仅催生了现代环保运动,也深刻影响了公众对现代性的认知,迫使人们反思人类活动对自然平衡的干扰。尽管卡森所处的时代,中产阶级权威的文化逐渐被多元化的“反传统”思潮所取代,但她的作品至今仍是关于环境保护和社会责任的有力提醒,其影响力跨越时代。

To call something “middlebrow” seems to dismiss it as unserious, but, when America was arguably at its intellectual peak, in the nineteen-fifties and sixties, this was the territory in which its writers excelled: distinguished work, aimed at readers who took the world seriously, available in mainstream magazines. That was the ocean in which Rachel Carson swam like few others. Her lyrical “The Sea Around Us” won the 1952 National Book Award and appeared on the Times’ best-seller list for an astonishing eighty-six weeks, a stretch when other recent releases included “East of Eden,” “Invisible Man,” and Anne Frank’s “The Diary of a Young Girl.” Oh, and “Charlotte’s Web.”

As it happens, the author of that last volume, the New Yorker essayist E. B. White, could have written Carson’s classic “Silent Spring,” which exposed the dangers of DDT and other pesticides. In the late fifties, Carson tried to interest White in the dangers of the chemicals then used for insect control on American farms and in gardens; White, after all, had written memorable reflections from his Maine cabin about the era’s most important environmental issue, the fallout from nuclear testing. But White encouraged an overworked Carson to do the job herself and alerted The New Yorker’s editor, William Shawn.

Before Carson turned to writing books, she had spent much of her career as a marine biologist at the federal Bureau of Fisheries, the kind of job that would now likely be DOGE’d. By the fifties, she had earned enough from her best-sellers to write full time, but she was taking care of her mother; also, she had breast cancer, which required a full mastectomy. But she worked steadily on “Silent Spring,” presenting it to Shawn in January, 1962; he responded, “You have made it literature, full of beauty and loveliness and depth of feeling.”

Indeed she had. “Silent Spring,” which Shawn published in three parts, in June of that year, was the best kind of middlebrow: powerful enough to activate emotions, never florid, willing to use the tropes of pastoral Americana for all they were worth. In reporting on the emerging science of pesticides, “Silent Spring” knocked some of the shine off modernity, nailing difficult questions to the door of the Church of Progress. Carson thought that man had grown overlarge and was upsetting a necessary balance.

She was immediately attacked by the industry she had called into question, in a way that set the playbook for the companies that profited from tobacco, asbestos, opioids, and fossil fuels. Pesticide producers assailed Carson’s credentials, her childlessness, and, more broadly, her gender. But she triumphed on the force of her writing and on the credibility that came from her centrality in mainstream intellectual life—a Book of the Month Club edition came with a special pamphlet by the Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who called it “the most revolutionary book since Uncle Tom’s Cabin”; when she testified before Congress, some people, paraphrasing Abraham Lincoln when he met Harriet Beecher Stowe, called her “the little lady that started it all.” In 1962, John F. Kennedy—whose “Profiles in Courage” had won a 1957 Pulitzer Prize while sharing the spotlight on best-seller lists with Carson’s “The Sea Around Us” follow-up, “The Edge of the Sea”—saluted “Miss Carson’s book” and launched a Science Advisory Committee investigation. The next year, the committee largely confirmed her reporting, and more rigorous federal regulation of DDT followed.

By then, events were gathering pace. On the one hand, environmentalism, which Carson had done so much to launch, gained momentum; within a decade, Earth Day became the largest political protest in the country’s history, and public scrutiny spread to a wide range of pollutants. But the era’s turbulence also began the erosion of the culture that lent Carson its powers, replacing ascendant middlebrow authority with the ten thousand flavors of contrarianism that have come to dominate civic life. That J.F.K.’s nephew now stands astride D.C., contaminating health policy with the crank complaints of Carson’s time—about fluoride in water, for instance—is as sharp a repudiation as one could imagine of everything that she stood for. ♦


If we are living so intimately with chemicals, we had better know something about their power.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

雷切尔·卡森 寂静的春天 环保主义 杀虫剂 科学传播
相关文章