Mashable 07月27日 02:42
Sam Altman gives really good reason why ChatGPT shouldn’t be your therapist
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

OpenAI首席执行官Sam Altman承认,AI行业尚未解决用户隐私问题,尤其是在敏感对话方面。与持证专业人士不同,AI不提供医患保密特权,用户在AI聊天机器人上的个人对话在法律上不受保护。任何在AI治疗会话中透露的信息都可能被访问甚至在法庭上被传唤。目前AI行业处于法律灰色地带,用户数据的具体使用很大程度上取决于州法律,这种法规的碎片化增加了不确定性。此外,OpenAI因与《纽约时报》的法律纠纷,需要保留所有用户对话记录,即使是用户已删除的内容。

🔒 AI聊天机器人缺乏法律保密特权:Sam Altman指出,与传统治疗师、律师或医生不同,与AI的对话目前不受法律隐私保护。这意味着用户分享的个人信息可能面临被访问或在法律程序中被用作证据的风险。

⚖️ 法律监管的灰色地带:AI行业在用户数据隐私方面面临法律真空。联邦法律对AI的监管有限,而州法律的差异性导致了用户数据使用方式的不确定性,尤其是在隐私方面,这可能会阻碍AI技术的广泛应用。

🔄 OpenAI的数据保留政策:由于与《纽约时报》的法律诉讼,OpenAI目前被要求保留所有用户对话记录,即使是用户自行删除的内容。这进一步加剧了用户对AI聊天机器人处理敏感个人信息的担忧。

📉 用户隐私是AI治疗的重大障碍:虽然年轻用户倾向于将AI视为治疗师或生活教练,但缺乏隐私保护机制使得AI无法提供真正安全的、可信赖的心理健康支持。用户在AI上的坦诚交流可能无意中暴露个人隐私。

If you need another reason to reconsider using an AI chatbot as your therapist, take it from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

In a recent appearance on This Past Weekend with Theo Von, Altman admitted to the comedian that the AI industry hasn’t yet solved the issue of user privacy when it comes to sensitive conversations. Unlike a licensed professional, an AI doesn’t offer doctor-patient confidentiality, and legally, your most personal chats aren’t protected.

"People talk about the most personal shit in their lives to ChatGPT," Altman said. "Young people especially use it as a therapist, a life coach, asking about relationship problems and what to do."

But there’s a major difference: "Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there’s legal privilege for it... We haven’t figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT."

Without confidentiality protections, anything said in an AI therapy session could be accessed or even subpoenaed in court. The AI industry currently operates in a legal gray area, as the Trump administration continues to navigate the clash between federal and state authority over AI regulation.

While a few federal laws targeting deepfakes exist, how user data from AI chats can be used still depends heavily on state laws. This patchwork of regulations creates uncertainty — especially around privacy — which could hinder broader user adoption. Adding to the concern, AI models already rely heavily on online data for training and, in some cases, are now being asked to produce user chat data in legal proceedings.

In the case of ChatGPT specifically, OpenAI is currently required to retain records of all user conversations — even those users have deleted — due to its ongoing legal battle with The New York Times. The company is challenging the court’s ruling and is actively seeking to have it overturned.

"No one had to think about that even a year ago," Altman said, calling the situation "very screwed up."


Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI聊天机器人 用户隐私 Sam Altman 心理治疗 法律监管
相关文章