All Content from Business Insider 07月26日 02:32
Trump made Paramount pay. Is this the new normal?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国媒体报道称,在唐纳德·特朗普政府批准Paramount公司出售给Skydance的交易前后,Paramount向特朗普支付了1600万美元的诉讼和解金,引发了关于政商勾结的广泛讨论。尽管特朗普是以私人身份提起诉讼,但分析人士普遍认为,此次和解和政府批准之间存在密切关联,尤其是在特朗普政府时期,大公司为达成交易而向其支付巨额款项的现象屡见不鲜。此次事件也引发了对未来类似交易的担忧,以及企业在美国进行商业活动时可能面临的潜在“保护费”问题。

💰 诉讼和解与交易批准的巧合:Paramount公司在特朗普政府正式批准其出售给Skydance的前两天,向特朗普支付了1600万美元以和解一项由特朗普提起的诉讼。这一时间上的高度重合,使得外界普遍怀疑两件事之间存在关联,认为Paramount此举是为了顺利促成交易。

⚖️ 特朗普的“商业影响力”:文章指出,在特朗普担任总统期间,包括迪士尼和Meta在内的大公司都曾向特朗普支付巨额款项以和解其提起的诉讼,而这些诉讼在常理下难以胜诉。这表明特朗普可能利用其总统职位的影响力,将个人利益与商业交易挂钩,迫使企业“付费”以解决法律纠纷。

🤝 政商利益的深度交织:文章认为,尽管特朗普提起诉讼时是作为私人公民,但其获得巨额和解金以及交易获得政府批准(由特朗普的盟友负责审批)的现实,揭示了政治权力和商业利益之间可能存在的深度交织。这种模式可能成为未来企业在美国进行交易时的一种“潜规则”。

🔮 未来交易的潜在担忧:作者对未来可能出现的类似交易表达了担忧,暗示企业在美国进行商业活动时,可能需要“买路钱”,即向特定政治人物支付款项才能顺利推进交易。这种现象对公平竞争和商业环境构成了潜在威胁。

Donald Trump got what he wanted — a $16 million settlement from Paramount — and then Paramount got to do the deal its owner wanted.

Want to do business in the United States?

Pay up. More specifically: Pay Donald Trump.

That's a reasonable lesson to draw from the Paramount-Skydance deal, which received formal government approval Thursday and should finally close in the coming weeks — about 1.5 years after it first kicked off.

We don't know how Skydance's David Ellison, who is buying Paramount with the backing of his father, Larry Ellison, will run the company. Maybe he'll be able to turn the company around, and years from now we'll note how he made a savvy purchase of a distressed asset at a fire-sale price. Maybe it continues to decline. Maybe he ends up flipping it to someone bigger in short order.

But the most important thing is the thing that was clear back in January, when Donald Trump started his second term as president: If current owner Shari Redstone wanted to sell the company to Ellison, she would need to cut Trump a check.

That happened on Tuesday, when Paramount's current management formally settled a lawsuit Trump filed against the company last year. They paid $16 million, most of which is ostensibly earmarked for Trump's future presidential library.

And on Thursday, the deal got formal approval from the Federal Communications Commission, run by Brendan Carr, a Trump loyalist who sometimes wears a pin in the shape of Trump's head on his suit.

In theory, the Trump lawsuit and Carr's approval were separate events. In reality, it would be very hard to find anyone who believes that. (I've asked Carr for comment.)

This is a story that has kicked up a lot of attention in the home stretch. Some of the angles are most definitely real, and concerning. Like the fact that Carr's blessing comes with pledges from Ellison to do things like "root out bias" in CBS's news coverage, which sounds very much like a company promising to cover news in a way that pleases Carr and his boss.

Some of the angles are much muddier: While we've yet to see any actual evidence that Paramount canceled Stephen Colbert's late-night show to get the deal done, it's reasonable for people to jump to that conclusion. (Over at The Ankler, veteran TV reporter Lesley Goldberg makes a compelling argument that the cancellation had everything to do with business, and nothing to do with Trump.)

We also don't know whether the Ellisons have also agreed to give Trump $16 million or $20 million in other goodies as part of the deal, as Trump has claimed at various times. (Paramount has said it has no knowledge of extra payments; team Ellison hasn't commented.)

But the main point is the main point, which we've known for many months: Last fall, Trump filed a suit against Paramount over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris. In any other world, that suit would go nowhere. But then Trump was elected, and started getting Very Big Companies like Disney and Meta to pay him to settle other suits he would normally have little chance of winning. (Like Paramount, those settlements were made directly to him, via his future library — as opposed to other settlements he is extracting from institutions like colleges and law firms, which are paying the federal government.)

So it was clear that Paramount would have to do the same thing, or it couldn't do the Skydance deal.

Again: In theory, the "60 Minutes" suit had nothing to do with Trump's role as president of the United States — he filed it as a private citizen, prior to his inauguration.

In reality, the only reason Paramount settled it was because he's president of the United States — and one that's willing to use that power to insert himself into day-to-day business deals.

Hard to believe this will be the last one where that happens.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特朗普 Paramount Skydance 政商关系 利益冲突
相关文章