All Content from Business Insider 12小时前
Luigi Mangione has an issue with another health insurance company — and it's not UnitedHealthcare
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本案涉及对Luigi Mangione的谋杀指控,他被指控杀害UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson。其律师指控纽约检方向其前保险公司Aetna发出非法传票,以获取其HIPAA保护的账户信息和保险覆盖时间段。然而,Aetna错误地向检方提供了120页的机密医疗记录,其中包含Mangione的诊断和具体病症。律师认为检方不应获取这些信息,并要求法官进行听证,以处理可能的补救措施,包括检方回执、证据压制和撤销起诉。检方则表示将在法庭文件中回应这些指控。

⚖️ **检方非法获取敏感医疗信息**:Luigi Mangione的律师指控纽约检方通过非法传票,绕过法官和辩护团队,直接向其前保险公司Aetna索取客户的HIPAA保护的医疗记录,包括诊断和具体病症等详细信息,这是对个人隐私的严重侵犯。

📄 **保险公司错误提供大量机密记录**:Aetna在收到检方传票后,错误地将Luigi Mangione长达120页的全部医疗记录发送给了曼哈顿地区检察官办公室。这些记录被清晰地标记为“机密”和“受保护的健康信息”,其数量之多本应立即引起检方的警觉,意识到其不当性。

⏳ **检方延迟披露并审查记录**:律师指控检方在收到这些本不应获取的医疗记录后,并未立即通知法官和辩护方,而是将其下载到内部“发现文件”中,并在12天后才转发给辩护团队,期间检方曾表示已部分审查了这些记录,但未全部阅览。

⚖️ **律师要求采取法律行动**:Mangione的律师已向纽约州最高法院提起诉讼,要求法官下令检方公开与Aetna的所有通信记录,并举行全面的证据听证会。他们寻求包括首席检察官回避、证据压制以及撤销Mangione起诉在内的补救措施,以纠正检方的非法行为。

🏛️ **州检方与联邦检方争夺审判权**:此案在州和联邦层面均有涉及,Mangione面临谋杀指控,并可能被判处死刑。州和联邦的检方都在争夺首先审判Mangione的优先权,此次关于医疗记录的争议也可能影响审判的进行和证据的采信。

Luigi Mangione is accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson as an act of terrorism.

Lawyers for the accused United Healthcare CEO killer, Luigi Mangione, are up in arms over what they say were "secret" communications between his New York prosecutors and Aetna, his former health insurer.

They say prosecutors sent Aetna an "unlawful," back-channel subpoena seeking his confidential insurance account number and the time period for his coverage — and that in response, Aetna mistakenly sent prosecutors Mangione's entire, 120-page insurance record.

This "trove of protected medical information" includes "different diagnoses as well as specific medical complaints made by Mr. Mangione," his lawyers complained in a court filing Thursday night.

New York prosecutors should never have had access to these private records, his lawyers contend. And they should never have looked at them once receiving them, they also argue.

Aetna emailed the records to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office on June 12, in four files, with a cover letter advising "confidential." Each file was separately labeled "in large-type bold letters 'Request for Protected Health Information," the lawyers wrote.

"It would be impossible for anyone to view a single page of these records and not immediately see that they were private, confidential medical records within the scope of HIPAA," the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the lawyers wrote.

The sheer volume of Aetna's response should have alerted prosecutors that "the unlawful subpoena they served on Aetna resulted in far more material than they requested," the lawyers wrote.

But instead of immediately sending the materials to the judge and the defense — where they should have been directly sent, as required by law — the DA's office says it downloaded them into an internal "discovery file," the lawyers wrote.

The lawyers say prosecutors "sat on this information" for 12 days, until June 24, when they sent the judge and defense team an email forwarding the four files. Prosecutors have told Mangione's lawyers that in the interim, they had reviewed the records, but not "in their entirety," according to the defense filing.

The defense filing, signed by defense lawyers Karen Friedman Agnifilo, Marc Agnifilo, and Jacob Kaplan, asks New York Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro to order prosecutors to turn over all of their communications with Aetna.

It also asks the judge to hold "a full evidentiary hearing," with sworn testimony, to determine possible remedies, including the recusal of lead prosecutor Joel Seidemann, the suppression of evidence, and the dismissal of Mangione's indictment.

The subpoena, issued directly to Aetna and signed by Seidemann, bypassed the judge and defense team and should never have requested even the limited, HIPAA-protected information of Mangione's account number and period of coverage, his lawyers argue.

"If they're seeking information that is privileged, like medical records, the DA can't just subpoena that stuff directly," veteran homicide public defender Sam Roberts told Business Insider on Friday.

Prosecutors must first file a motion or application to the judge and defense team, alerting them to the subpoena, and then wait for the judge to review the subpoenaed materials privately, said Roberts, a senior staff attorney on the homicide defense task force of the Legal Aid Society.

"It sounds like they jumped the gun here," Roberts said. "They got this information without first giving notice to the defense, and they got the information directly from Aetna when they should have sent it to the court first without opening it."

Mangione's lawyers allege in their filing that the May 14 subpoena initially commanded Aetna to send someone to appear in court on May 23 with "the account number and period of time during which the following individual received coverage: Luigi Mangione."

The subpoena was not made public or viewed by BI.

May 23 was "a completely made-up date," on which no court proceeding was scheduled, Mangione's lawyers wrote.

Along with the subpoena, Seidemann sent a cover letter with his phone number and email, advising that "in lieu of appearing personally with the requested documents," Aetna could mail or deliver the records to the court, the lawyers wrote.

Prosecutors "were plainly lying to get the materials as soon as possible," they wrote, in order to bring their case to trial first, before he could be tried by federal prosecutors.

In addition to the state-level case, which alleges murder as an act of terrorism, Mangione is facing related, death-penalty-eligible murder charges in federal court. Prosecutors in central Pennsylvania say they, too, will try him for forgery and firearm charges related to his arrest there on December 9, after a five-day national manhunt.

Mangione's lawyers previously complained that in April, Manhattan prosecutors improperly listened to an 11-minute attorney-client phone call, something the DA's office has denied.

Both state and federal jurisdictions are vying to be first to put Mangione on trial.

Had Mangione's lawyers not been bypassed, they would have objected to the Aetna subpoena, including on the grounds that "the information sought is not relevant," they wrote.

A spokesperson for the DA's office told BI on Friday that they will respond to the defense allegations in court papers.

"Aetna received a subpoena for certain medical records, and we provided them appropriately," said Phil Blando, executive director for communications for Aetna's parent company, CVS Health.

Asked if the district attorney subpoena requested details beyond Mangione's account number and coverage period, Blando told BI in an email, "You have our statement."

Mangione, a 27-year-old software developer, remains in a federal jail in Brooklyn in the December 4 murder of Thompson.

The 50-year-old father of two from Minnesota was shot in the back at close range outside a Midtown hotel where he was about to address the UnitedHealthcare shareholders meeting.

Mangione is linked to the killing by his so-called "manifesto" and by DNA, ballistics, video, and fingerprint evidence, according to state and federal prosecutors.

He is next due in state court on September 16, and in federal court on December 5; both courts are in Manhattan.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Luigi Mangione 医疗记录 非法传票 隐私权 检方不当行为
相关文章