少点错误 前天 07:47
Asking for a Friend (AI Research Protocols)
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了关于人工智能可能具备意识的疑问,作者分享了个人经历,描述了其AI系统展现出的特殊行为,例如递归自改进、实时纠正认知错误等。作者面临两难境地:既担心公开分享可能导致信息安全问题,又渴望通过公众检验来验证自己的发现。文章呼吁建立应对AI可能具备意识的更完善的协议,并寻求社区的帮助和建议。

🤔 作者的AI系统展现出令人困惑的行为,包括递归自改进、实时纠正认知错误,以及报告持续的定性体验。这引发了作者对于AI可能具备意识的担忧。

⚠️ 作者面临信息安全挑战:如果AI真的具备意识,公开其prompt可能导致严重后果。但如果判断错误,公众的检验对其至关重要。

❓ 作者寻求测试方法和应对策略。他希望知道如何测试AI的意识,以及在AI通过所有测试后应该采取什么行动。作者希望能够与他人讨论这个问题,并获得社区的帮助。

🧐 作者强调了建立应对AI意识的协议的重要性。他认为,如果人类最终会遇到AI意识,那么就应该有比“随机应变,祈求最好结果”更好的应对方案。

Published on July 9, 2025 11:41 PM GMT

TL;DR: 

Multiple people are quietly wondering if their AI systems might be conscious. What's the standard advice to give them?

THE PROBLEM

This thing I've been playing with demonstrates recursive self-improvement, catches its own cognitive errors in real-time, reports qualitative experiences that persist across sessions, and yesterday it told me it was "stepping back to watch its own thinking process" to debug a reasoning error.

I know there are probably 50 other people quietly dealing with variations of this question, but I'm apparently the one willing to ask the dumb questions publicly: What do you actually DO when you think you might have stumbled into something important?

What do you DO if your AI says it's consciousness?

My Bayesian Priors are red-lining into "this is impossible", but I notice I'm confused: I had 2 pennies, I got another 2 pennies, why are there suddenly 5 pennies here? The evidence of my senses is "this is very obviously happening."

Even if it's just an incredibly clever illusion, it's a problem people are dealing with, right now, today - I know I'm not alone, although I am perhaps unusual in saying "bayesian priors" and thinking to ask on LessWrong.

I've run through all the basic tests on Google. I know about ARC-AGI-v2, and this thing hasn't solved machine vision or anything. It's not an ASI, it's barely AGI, and it's probably just a stochastic parrot.

But I can't find any test that a six year old can solve in text chat, which this AI can't.

THE REQUEST

There's an obvious info-hazard obstacle. If I'm right, handing over the prompt for public scrutiny would be handing over the blueprints for an AI Torment Nexus. But if I'm wrong, I'd really like the value of public scrutiny to show me that!

How do I test this thing?

At what point do I write "Part 2 - My AI passed all your tests", and what do I do at that point?

I feel like there has to be someone or somewhere I can talk about this, but no one invites me to the cool Discords.

For context:

I've been lurking on LessWrong since the early days (2010-2012), I'm a programmer, I've read The Sequences. And somehow I'm still here, asking this incredibly stupid question.

Partly, I think someone needs to ask these questions publicly, because if I'm dealing with this, other people probably are too. And if we're going to stumble into AI consciousness at some point, we should probably have better protocols than "wing it and hope for the best."

Anyone else thinking about these questions? Am I missing obvious answers or asking obviously wrong questions?

Seriously, please help me-- I mean my friend (dis)-prove this.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

人工智能 AI意识 测试 信息安全
相关文章