All Content from Business Insider 07月08日 23:41
An apparel designer analyzed the pants Lululemon accused Costco of copying — and sided with the warehouse club
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

Lululemon因Costco销售与其设计相似的服装而提起诉讼,引发了关于设计侵权和行业标准的讨论。时尚工作室Shift的CEO Joe Ng对两家公司的裤子进行了对比分析,认为Costco裤子主要使用了常见的设计元素和技术。Lululemon指控Costco侵犯了其知识产权,尤其是ABC男裤的设计。Ng认为Lululemon试图控制一些常用的设计元素,可能对小型公司构成风险。该诉讼的焦点在于“外观设计”,而非功能特性。Ng指出,Lululemon强调的许多设计元素具有功能性,且被广泛使用。最终,Ng虽然认可Lululemon的产品质量,但认为Costco的设计并未构成侵权,消费者选择更多基于合身度、面料和做工,而非外观。

👖 Lululemon起诉Costco侵犯其ABC男裤的设计知识产权,主要针对“外观设计”,而非功能特性。

👨‍🎨 时尚工作室Shift的CEO Joe Ng分析认为,Costco裤子使用了许多常见的设计元素,例如裆部“嵌片”、后片设计和弧形口袋等。

💡 Ng指出,Lululemon试图控制的设计元素具有功能性,且被许多设计师使用,这引发了对行业标准的讨论,可能对小型公司构成风险。

💰 Costco的裤子价格约为20美元,而Lululemon的裤子售价128美元,Ng认为,消费者选择主要基于合身度、面料和做工,而非外观,两者目标客户群体不同。

⚖️ Ng认为Costco的设计并未构成侵权,但承认Lululemon的ABC裤子质量更好,并指出产品开发通常建立在现有设计之上。

A customer shops at a Lululemon store in Florida.

An apparel designer has weighed in on the controversy surrounding a pair of Costco pants that bear a striking resemblance to a popular Lululemon design.

Lululemon sued Costco late last month, accusing the warehouse club of infringing its intellectual property rights to several designs, including its ABC style of men's pants, named for its "anti-ball crushing" design.

YouTuber and CEO of fashion studio Shift Fashion Group, Joe Ng, took pairs of each company's pants identified in the complaint and analyzed them against the athleisure company's claims.

His analysis was based on his expertise as a fashion designer and consultant. While Ng isn't a lawyer, his company partners with brands to design and produce apparel. He has a series of videos in which he disassembles popular articles of clothing to see how they are made.

Ng said in the video that he respected Lululemon's superior design but was concerned that the company appears to be trying to assert legal control over several commonly used design elements. This could put smaller companies like his at risk, he said.

A Lululemon spokesperson said in a statement to Business Insider, the company invests significantly in research, development, and design for its products.

"We take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary," the spokesperson said.

Costco did not respond to a request for comment from BI on this story.

The lawsuit focuses on "trade dress," which refers to the outward appearance of a product, rather than its functional features.

US protections for trade dress are typically easier to enforce than functional patents, but design patents only protect elements that are nonfunctional, according to an article on the American Bar Association's website. Think of the iconic Coke bottle shape or the Nike Air Force One sneaker — the appearance doesn't affect how the product is made or used.

However, Ng said in the YouTube video that many of the design elements that Lululemon highlighted in its lawsuit have functional purposes and are used by many designers.

In its complaint, Lululemon said Costco copied several features of the ABC Pants to make its Kirkland Signature 5 Pocket Performance Pant. Those include a crotch "gusset," a rear panel separating the belt loops and pockets, and curved pockets adorned with a "decorative metallic circle."

"When you really look at what a gusset does, it's about having enough fabric here to alleviate pressure from the front and back seams to make it more comfortable for the wearer," Ng said in his video. "What makes the ABC pant anti-ball crushing is the actual gusset itself."

In addition to Costco, several denim and workwear pants from other manufacturers feature a similar crotch gusset for comfort, mobility, and durability.

Ng also said that both the rear panel and the curved pockets with rivets are common features of many denim pants, most notably the 58-year-old design of Levi's 505 jeans.

"Just Google 'five pocket pant,'" he said. "They're going to be present on pretty much all of those pants."

The similarities that Lululemon highlights between the two pants aren't likely to convince a shopper to trade up or down from their respective choice, which is likely based on fit, fabric, and finish, rather than aesthetics, Ng said. Costco's pants cost around $20, while Lululemon's retail for $128.

"Are these alleged dupes comparable to the ABC pant? I would say no," he said. "I don't think that the consumer who is looking to buy this pant is the same consumer who's looking to buy this pant."

While Ng sided with Costco in his assessment of Lululemon's lawsuit, he concluded, as several other reviewers have, that the authentic ABC pants are a much better product.

"Would I be surprised if the Kirkland team drew inspiration from the ABC Pant? Absolutely not. Just as I wouldn't be surprised if the ABC pant team drew inspiration from a pair of denim," he said. "That is how good product development works. You build upon the ideas that come before you."

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Lululemon Costco 设计侵权 ABC男裤 知识产权
相关文章