TechCrunch News 前天 23:36
SCOTUS porn ruling opens door to sweeping internet age verification
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国最高法院裁定支持德克萨斯州的一项法律,该法律要求提供“对未成年人有害的色情内容”的网站验证所有访问者的年龄。这项裁决对互联网隐私具有深远影响,因为包括德州在内的多个州已经或正在制定类似的年龄验证法律。这些法律要求用户上传政府ID或使用第三方验证平台来证明年龄,引发了对用户数字安全和潜在歧视的担忧。批评者认为,此类措施可能损害用户隐私,并可能被用来审查 LGBTQ 相关内容,甚至基本的性教育信息,这与美国各地 LGBTQ 权利受到的攻击以及政府网站上对 LGBTQ 历史的审查有关。

🔞 最高法院裁定维持德州法律,该法律要求提供“对未成年人有害的色情内容”的网站验证所有访问者的年龄。

🆔 年龄验证并非简单点击,而是需要上传政府ID或使用第三方平台验证年龄,这引发了对用户数字安全的担忧。

🌐 许多州已实施或正在制定类似法律,可能对互联网隐私产生广泛影响,并可能导致个人信息泄露。

🏳️‍🌈 批评者担心,此类法律可能被用于审查 LGBTQ 相关内容,甚至基本的性教育信息,这与 LGBTQ 权利受到的攻击有关。

The United States Supreme Court ruled Friday to uphold a Texas law requiring websites with “sexual material harmful to minors” to verify the ages of all visitors. The Free Speech Coalition (FSC), a trade association for the adult industry, had brought the lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging the state’s age verification law.

Age verification in this context does not mean mindlessly clicking a box to declare that you are an adult – it means uploading government ID documents or using third-party verification platforms to prove your age.

This decision has far-reaching ramifications for internet privacy. Eighteen states have already enacted laws requiring age verification to access such websites, while six additional states have passed legislation that has not yet taken effect. Under the Texas law that the FSC challenged, a pornographic website is defined as having at least one-third of its content deemed “harmful to minors.”

Internet privacy advocates have long criticized these age checks for their potential to compromise users’ digital security, even when verification companies vow not to retain identifying information. In some cases, these age checks are conducted via government tools, and it’s not abnormal for hackers to breach government databases. 

At a time when LGBTQ rights are under attack in the U.S., activists have protested that laws like this could be used to classify non-pornographic information about the LGBTQ community, as well as basic sex education, to be “sexual material harmful to minors.” These concerns appear well-founded, given that President Trump’s administration has removed references to civil rights movements and LGBTQ history from some government websites.

The original Texas age-verification law, HB 1181, was passed around the same time the state imposed other legal restrictions on the LGBTQ community, including limits on public drag shows and bans on gender-affirming care for minors. The drag show law was later deemed unconstitutional for violating the First Amendment.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

最高法院 年龄验证 互联网隐私 LGBTQ
相关文章