Mashable 22小时前
Using ChatGPT to write? MIT study says theres a cognitive cost.
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项由MIT、卫斯理学院和马萨诸塞艺术与设计学院的研究表明,过度依赖ChatGPT等大型语言模型会显著损害用户的批判性思维能力。研究发现,使用ChatGPT的用户在神经、语言和行为层面上的表现持续下降,包括大脑活动减少、作者意识减弱以及记忆力下降。即使在停止使用LLM后,这些负面影响仍然存在。研究人员警告称,鉴于生成式AI的快速普及,尤其是在教育领域,了解ChatGPT对大脑的影响至关重要。

🧠 研究发现,使用ChatGPT的用户在神经、语言和行为层面上的表现持续下降,包括大脑活动减少、作者意识减弱以及记忆力下降。

✍️ 研究将54名参与者分为三组,分别使用ChatGPT、Google搜索和无工具进行SAT论文写作。结果显示,使用ChatGPT的组别在引用自己文章内容时表现较差,83%的参与者难以正确引用。

🤔 研究表明,使用ChatGPT的参与者可能并未真正记住或内化他们所写的内容,这可能是由于将认知处理外包给了LLM。在第三次实验中,LLM组的论文大多为从ChatGPT复制粘贴,仅进行了少量编辑。

👤 此外,研究还发现,与无工具组相比,LLM组对文章的“所有权”感知呈现碎片化和冲突,部分用户对文章的归属感较低。

Relying on ChatGPT significantly affects critical thinking abilities, according to a new study.

Researchers from MIT Media Lab, Wellesley College, and Massachusetts College of Art and Design conducted a four-month study titled "Your Brain on ChatGPT" and found users of large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's chatbot "consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels."

This included the participants' decreased brain activity, a weaker sense of authorship, and inability to remember what they wrote — which even continued when they weren't allowed to use an LLM.

Anyone who uses ChatGPT for writing may have drawn similar conclusions; the point of using LLMs, after all, is to automate the work and outsource the critical thinking effort. But with this MIT study, there's now scientific evidence showing that relying on ChatGPT and other LLMs can impair memory and learning. It's worth noting that the study, published June 10, surveyed a small group and has not yet been peer-reviewed, but according to an interview with Time, the lead author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to publish the study as is, given the rapid adoption of genAI, particularly in education.

"What really motivated me to put it out now before waiting for a full peer review is that I am afraid in six to eight months, there will be some policymaker who decides, 'let’s do GPT kindergarten.' I think that would be absolutely bad and detrimental," said Kosmyna. In April, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to promote "AI literacy and proficiency of K-12 students," so the urgency to understand how ChatGPT is affecting our brains is all too real.

The study divided 54 participants into three groups with the task of writing SAT essays over the course of three sessions. One group used ChatGPT ("LLM group"), another group used Google search ("search engine group", and the third group wasn't allowed any tools ("brain only.") In an additional fourth session with 18 participants, the LLM group was tasked with writing an essay without ChatGPT and the brain only group was allowed to use ChatGPT. Researchers measured the participants' brain activity while they wrote the essays using electroencephalography (EEG), analyzed the essays using Natural Language Processing (NLP), and had the essays scored by AI and human graders.

Among the many discoveries detailed in the length paper, researchers discovered a stark decrease in the LLM group's "alpha band connectivity" which measures the brain's cognitive abilities like memory and language processing, compared to the brain only group.

This was evident when the participants were asked to quote from the essays they had written. "LLM users significantly underperformed in this domain, with 83 percent of participants reporting difficulty quoting in Session 1, and none providing correct quotes," reads the study.

In the fourth session, where the group previously using ChatGPT had to write an essay without it, the participants continued to struggle with quoting anything from what they had written. "LLM group's poor recall and incorrect quoting is a possible indicator that their earlier essays were not internally integrated, likely due to outsourced cognitive processing to the LLM," the study reads.

This suggests that the participants weren't really retaining what they wrote or took from ChatGPT. In fact, by the third session, the researchers reported that most of the essays from the LLM group were mostly copied and pasted responses from ChatGPT with "minimal editing."

Another effect researchers measured was the perceived level of "ownership" or belief that they had fully conceived of the essay. Compared to the brain only group, which consistency claimed almost full ownership, the LLM group "presented a fragmented and conflicted sense of authorship," with some claiming, full, partial, or no ownership whatsoever.

While it might be tempting to offload work into LLMs like ChatGPT, as this study shows, there could be long-term cognitive consequences.


Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

ChatGPT 批判性思维 AI影响
相关文章