少点错误 12小时前
Memories of the Neutral Zone
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文作者分享了其在量化金融领域的工作经验与感悟,涵盖了从风险管理、策略构建到团队协作等多个方面。文章深入探讨了量化投资中的核心原则,如风险控制的重要性、决策质量的重要性,以及声誉在行业中的作用。作者还分享了对市场、人才和机会成本的独到见解,为读者提供了宝贵的行业思考。

🤔 **警惕乐观偏见**: 量化投资需要保持高度的警惕性,对策略的有效性进行严格验证,并认识到市场环境的变化可能导致策略失效。

🧐 **全面考虑决策空间**: 强调在制定策略时,要全面考虑各种可能性,包括参数选择、风险管理等,并进行系统性的评估和测试。

📈 **关注市场动态**: 市场上涨时,量化策略可能表现不佳;但市场下跌时,量化策略仍能带来收益。因此,需要关注市场周期对策略的影响。

💡 **区分多元化与选择权**: 多元化源于回报来源的真正差异,而非简单地购买多个标的。真正的多元化是获取独立于市场的回报。

⏳ **认识收益的短暂性**: 策略的有效性会随着时间推移而衰减,需要持续构建和改进,而不是沉溺于过去的成功。

🤝 **重视声誉的力量**: 在信息高度保密、缺乏信任的量化金融行业中,良好的声誉是建立合作和获得成功的关键。

Published on June 16, 2025 3:33 PM GMT

Mid-Career Reflections on Quant Finance

I worked 2017-2024 at Two Sigma1, a systematic hedge fund. I loved working there, and was sad to leave.

2020-2024 my team and I founded and scaled the industry’s first (afaik) “systematic buy-side”2 alpha capture business.

I’m now on non-compete leave through December 2025, blessed with time and hindsight. Here are some lessons I plan to take with me.

1. Paranoia > optimism

Default tech mindset: “How do we ship and scale this?

Default quant mindset: “Why does this almost certainly fail?

This is healthy paranoia. Many strategies plausibly generate value. Meanwhile, the market turns every alpha into beta into noise.

A checklist I learned the hard way:

2. Scope the entire decision space.

“Think systematically” really means “list every option”.

For example, consider whether to de-mean a feature:

How many of these variations should I try? How do I pick the winner? Should I pick the winner the same way next time?

Every decision is like this, with layers and layers of choices. Dimensionalization helps.

3. Most of the time, Long > Neutral

When the markets are up (true most of the time), quants miss out. Market neutrality underperforms. Tech Equity > Quant Bonuses over the last 2 decades. And it’s more fun to root for everyone to win.

When the markets are down, everyone is worried, quants not excepted. But they are still making money.

4. Diversification → Optionality, but not vice versa.

10 orthogonal alpha strategies ≈ long 10 cheap call options3.
Buying 10 random call options does not recreate 10 orthogonal strategies.

Diversification comes from true differentiation in the source of return. Buying 10 tickets to the same lottery is not diversifying. Source independence is the scarce commodity.

5. Glory half-life ≈ 1hr.

The past is data. The present is noise. The future is revenue.

Decay starts immediately after release. Keep building; rest is expensive.

6. Failure is overdetermined and asymmetric.

Very few things unexpectedly go right: surprise usually hurts. And usually you can’t retire after one lucky call.

But any one thing that goes wrong, even (especially) unrelated to investments and ideas, can lead to ruin.

7. Agents do what rewards them.

There is not much confusion about what motivates people in quant finance. This is helpful for modeling, but brutal for trust.

Helpful, because if I know an agent acts in their own interest, their actions are a strong signal of what their interests are.

Brutal, because if I know anyone will take advantage of my weakness, I need to be on guard at all times.

Legalese is the duct tape over that bounded distrust.

8. Everything is a secret.

There will probably not be a DeepSeek moment in quant finance. No hedge fund is open-sourcing their alphas. Information is too valuable:

9. Reputation overcomes uncertainty.

If nothing can be trusted without a track record, and everything is a secret, how does anything get started?

Reputation is how. Reputation allows your model to have a lower discount rate, more optimistic scenario analyses, and stronger priors.

Not to mention that reputation helps you execute too.

10. The Sharpe-Capacity frontier

One of the best things about a high Sharpe strategy is that I know quickly if it stops working. Sharpe 5 means I cut after a few losing days in a row. At Sharpe 1, I might wait out years of losses.

But I can’t scale Sharpe 5 as big as Sharpe 1. Often the Sharpe‑1 behemoth out‑earns the Sharpe‑5 jewel in dollar terms. And I eat $ PNL, not σ‑adjusted virtue.

11. Opportunity Cost > Financial Cost

Every green‑lit project blocks a better unseen one and mortgages bandwidth to execute. Budget attention, not just capital.

12. Decision Quality >> Prediction Accuracy

The important thing is the buy/sell decision, not the accuracy of the input:

Accuracy is helpful, but the decision pays the bills4.

13. Friends >>> Allies

Allies are aligned: they pursue shared interests or goals. When context changes, alliances shift.

Friends stick around. But it’s hard to make friends when everyone (rationally) fears vulnerability.

This contrasts with the lesson imparted by many strategy games, where Ally is the highest relationship tier, while Friend happens early.

Coda

Your time, tools, and ideas are worth exactly what you can generate with them. If someone will pay more than that, consider it a blessing. And then price your optionality.

What heuristics keep you solvent? Leave a comment; I read everything.

1

Opinions solely mine; errors solely mine. Nothing here is investment advice.

2

“systematic buy-side” ≠ “systematic sell-side” ≠ “discretionary buy-side”

3

A good payoff profile for an alpha strategy is call-option-like: bounded downside, positive mean, fat right tail.

4

Of course, over many decisions, being more accurate should help. But accuracy only compounds if you survive.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

量化金融 风险管理 策略构建 市场分析
相关文章