The Verge - Artificial Intelligences 7小时前
Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

围绕英国AI行业监管,前Meta高管Nick Clegg认为,要求艺术家同意使用其作品训练AI模型将扼杀该行业。他认为预先征得同意在技术上不可行,因为AI系统需要处理海量数据。英国议会此前讨论了旨在提高创意产业对其作品被AI公司使用情况的透明度的立法,但该提案已被否决。支持者认为,透明度将有助于执行版权法,减少AI公司“盗用”作品的可能性。争议的核心在于如何在保护艺术家权益的同时,促进AI产业的发展。

🎨Nick Clegg认为,要求艺术家在AI模型使用其作品进行训练前征得同意是不可行的,因为AI系统需要处理海量数据,这在技术上难以实现。

✍️英国议会曾讨论一项修正案,旨在赋予创意产业更多关于其作品被AI公司使用方式的知情权,包括要求科技公司披露用于训练AI模型的版权作品。包括Paul McCartney、Dua Lipa等艺术家表示支持。

⚖️议会最终否决了该修正案,技术部长Peter Kyle表示,英国经济需要AI和创意产业共同发展。倡议者认为,透明度将有助于版权法的执行,并减少AI公司“盗用”作品的行为。

As policy makers in the UK weigh how to regulate the AI industry, Nick Clegg, former UK deputy prime minister and former Meta executive, claimed a push for artist consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.

Speaking at an event promoting his new book, Clegg said the creative community should have the right to opt out of having their work used to train AI models. But he claimed it wasn’t feasible to ask for consent before ingesting their work first.

“I think the creative community wants to go a step further,” Clegg said according to The Times. “Quite a lot of voices say, ‘You can only train on my content, [if you] first ask’. And I have to say that strikes me as somewhat implausible because these systems train on vast amounts of data.”

“I just don’t know how you go around, asking everyone first. I just don’t see how that would work,” Clegg said. “And by the way if you did it in Britain and no one else did it, you would basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight.”

The comments follow a back-and-forth in Parliament over new legislation that aims to give creative industries more insight into how their work is used by AI companies. An amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill would require technology companies to disclose what copyrighted works were used to train AI models. Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Elton John, and Andrew Lloyd Webber are among the hundreds of musicians, writers, designers, and journalists who signed an open letter in support of the amendment earlier in May.

The amendment — introduced by Beeban Kidron, who is also a film producer and director — has bounced around gaining support. But on Thursday members of parliament rejected the proposal, with technology secretary Peter Kyle saying the “Britain’s economy needs both [AI and creative] sectors to succeed and to prosper.” Kidron and others have said a transparency requirement would allow copyright law to be enforced, and that AI companies would be less likely to “steal” work in the first place if they are required to disclose what content they used to train models.

In an op-ed in the Guardian Kidron promised that “the fight isn’t over yet,” as the Data (Use and Access) Bill returns to the House of Lords in early June.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI监管 艺术家版权 AI行业 英国 数据使用
相关文章