少点错误 前天 01:07
My rant on how rent prices
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了聚集效应下城市高租金对个人财富和创业的影响。作者指出,人们为了靠近彼此而聚集,导致高昂的租金,这不仅包括实际租金,还涉及各种生活成本。这些高昂的成本并非流向某个“地主阶级”,而是被浪费在无用的工作中,形成负和博弈。作者认为,解决这一问题的方法之一是政府拥有土地,仅以维护成本出租,并通过邻居投票来决定谁能填补空缺。

🏘️ 聚集效应导致高昂租金:人们为了靠近彼此以促进商业发展,如硅谷的例子。然而,这种聚集带来了高昂的租金,包括实际租金、抵押贷款、生活成本和税收等。

💸 高租金的分配:高昂的租金并非流向某个“地主阶级”,而是被浪费在无用的工作中。人们为了争夺“免费”的资源,投入大量时间和资源,最终导致平均收益并无改善,形成负和博弈。

📉 高租金的负面影响:高租金不仅减少了个人财富和初创企业的生存能力,还导致资源浪费。它被用于广告、投机、官僚主义以及与就业不相关的教育等。

💡 解决方案:解决高租金问题的一种方法是政府拥有土地,仅以维护成本出租,并通过邻居投票来决定谁能填补空缺。

Published on May 25, 2025 5:04 PM GMT

09:46: Everyone wants to be close to everyone else to do good business effectively. Like Silicon Valley for example, smart people want to go there and be close to other smart people in order to start a successful business.
09:47: But as soon as they get close to each other, imagine that they all have to pay this extremely high rent. Simply once they get close to each other. They can't all move house at once to a new city. That's too difficult. So this network effect forces them to concentrate in one place.
09:47: They want to be close to each other, they are attracted to each other. But once they get close enough this really high rent emerges below them.
09:48: And they have to pay a lot of money towards this rent. This "rent" isn't just the actual technical rent. It's money they pay in mortgages to buy their house. It's money they pay in groceries to a grocery store which is paying high rent. And money they pay the government in taxes to pay for a hospital which pays a lot for buying (or renting) the property, especially if they have to expand.
09:49: And so they pay this really high rent. Which greatly reduces their wealth, the viability of startups, and so forth.
09:50: And where does this rent go? I wished it went to some mystical "landlord" class. Who then become rich. And that it's a zero sum game, these people lose a lot of money, but someone else gains money, so in the end it's okay.
09:51: But no, it doesn't go to some mythical landlord class, unfortunately. A more practical understanding is this rent is money which someone throws at random into a crowd.
09:51: They stand on a high building and throw it all down.
09:51: At first a few lucky people pick up the money and become happy. But once news of them becoming rich breaks out, more people from far away say I want that too, and arrive to pick up the money. And they all become rich, causing the news to make more people come. And more people come. And finally, it reaches equilibrium. So many people are coming to pick up this free money, that a lot of them loses money, and on average they are no better off, their job is no easier than other jobs, due to the extreme competition picking up this free money. It costs people so much time and resources to get this free money, due to the competition for picking it up, that in the end it's no more efficient than any other career. It is no longer free money. It is money spent paying for useless work.
09:54: And so it's not a zero sum game. It's a negative sum game. The rent paid does not go to some mystical landlord class who are now extremely happy. The rent paid is burned. Into doing useless work.
09:55: It goes to a million different things people spend time and resources on to win as much as they can in the real estate game. Advertising. Speculation. Bureaucracy. Education in the bureaucracy, some of which goes to people who never find suitable work.
09:56: So how do we fix this problem? One way is to build a city where the government owns the land, rents it only for the maintenance price, and chooses people by letting neighbours vote who gets to fill in each vacancy.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

租金 聚集效应 负和博弈 城市规划
相关文章