TechCrunch News 05月08日 04:31
Tesla ‘Robotaxi’ trademark refused for being too generic
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

特斯拉公司申请“Robotaxi”商标的尝试遭遇挫折。美国专利商标局(USPTO)以该术语过于通用为由拒绝了特斯拉的申请。此前,特斯拉于2024年10月申请了该商标,计划将其用于未来的自动驾驶出租车服务。USPTO认为“Robotaxi”是对类似商品和服务的通用描述,并要求特斯拉提供详细证据以证明其商标的独特性。同时,特斯拉另一份涵盖交通运输服务的“Robotaxi”商标申请仍在审查中,结果未定。

🤖 特斯拉申请“Robotaxi”商标,旨在用于其未来的自动驾驶出租车服务。

🤔 USPTO以“Robotaxi”过于通用为由拒绝了该商标申请,认为该术语是对类似商品和服务的通用描述。

📝 USPTO要求特斯拉提供详细证据,包括宣传材料和网站截图,以证明其商标的独特性。

🚦 特斯拉另一份涵盖交通运输服务的“Robotaxi”商标申请仍在审查中,结果未定。

Tesla’s attempt to trademark the term “Robotaxi” in reference to its vehicles has been refused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for being too generic, according to a new filing. Another application by Tesla to trademark the term “Robotaxi” for its upcoming ride-hailing service is still under examination by the office.

The USPTO issued Tuesday what’s known as a “nonfinal office action,” which means Tesla has three months to file a response or the office will abandon the application. A trademark lawyer representing Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tesla applied for the trademarks in October 2024 on the same day that it revealed its so-called Cybercab, the purpose-built electric car that it hopes to one day use in its planned autonomous ride-hailing service. Tesla also submitted two similar trademark applications October 10 for the term “Robobus” that are still under examination.

The trademark that was refused was assigned to a USPTO examiner on April 14. Tesla said it would use the word in reference to “Land vehicles; electric vehicles, namely automobiles; automobiles; and structural parts therefor,” according to the original application.

While the USPTO examiner found there were no conflicting trademarks in existence, it refused the application because it was “merely descriptive.” The examiner wrote that the term “robotaxi” is “used to describe similar goods and services by other companies.”

“[S]uch wording appears to be generic in the context of applicant’s goods and/or services,” the examiner wrote.

Tesla will be allowed to submit evidence and arguments to support its argument in favor of the trademark. If it does, the USPTO wants Tesla to provide: “Fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, advertisements and pertinent screenshots of applicant’s website as it relates to the goods and/or services in the application, including any materials using the terms in the applied-for mark.”

In other words, Tesla needs to give the agency specific plans for how and why it deserves the “Robotaxi” trademark.

Techcrunch event

Berkeley, CA | June 5

BOOK NOW

The examiner also wrote that Tesla will need to tell the USPTO if “competitors” use the terms “ROBO, ROBOT, or ROBOTIC to advertise similar goods and/or services.”

Tesla’s other application for the “Robotaxi” trademark would cover the use of the word when offering transportation services, including “coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groups,” “arranging time-based ridesharing services,” and offering vehicle sharing or rentals. That application was also assigned to a USPTO examiner on April 14, but no decision has been filed.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特斯拉 Robotaxi 商标 USPTO
相关文章