TechCrunch News 04月13日 23:28
Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk would like to ‘delete all IP law’
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

推特(现为X)和Square(现为Block)的联合创始人Jack Dorsey在社交媒体上呼吁废除所有知识产权法,引发了一场关于知识产权、专利和版权的激烈辩论。这一言论迅速得到了X现任所有者Elon Musk的赞同。尽管具体原因尚不明确,但此举正值OpenAI等AI公司因涉嫌侵犯版权而面临多起诉讼之际。讨论的核心围绕着AI时代知识产权的未来、创作者的权益以及现有知识产权制度的公平性展开。Dorsey认为现有制度对创作者的剥削过重,而Musk则一贯对专利持怀疑态度。这场争论揭示了科技界对知识产权的不同看法,以及AI技术发展对传统法律框架的挑战。

🤔 Dorsey和Musk在社交媒体上公开呼吁废除所有知识产权法,引发广泛争议。他们认为现有的知识产权制度存在问题,尤其是在AI技术快速发展的背景下。

💡 Dorsey认为,现有的知识产权制度“从创作者那里拿走了太多”,并“只租不卖”。他主张建立“更好的模式来支付创作者”,暗示现有制度中存在不公平的分配问题。

⚖️ 反对者认为,废除知识产权法将损害创作者的权益,并质疑Dorsey和Musk的公司如果没有知识产权法,是否能够存在。他们强调知识产权是区分人类创作和AI创作的关键。

🌐 Musk过去曾表示对专利的质疑,例如特斯拉曾承诺不会对善意使用其专利的公司强制执行。这反映了科技界对知识产权的不同态度,以及对创新和竞争的看法。

Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter (now X) and Square (now Block), sparked a weekend’s worth of debate around intellectual property, patents, and copyright, with a characteristically terse post declaring, “delete all IP law.”

X’s current owner Elon Musk quickly replied, “I agree.”

It’s not clear what exactly brought these comments on, but they come at a time when AI companies including OpenAI (which Musk co-founded, competes with, and is challenging in court) are facing numerous lawsuits alleging that they’ve violated copyright to train their models.

Indeed, tech evangelist and investor Chris Messina alluded to this while writing that Dorsey “has a point,” because, “Automated IP fines/3-strike rules for AI infringement may become the substitute for putting poor people in jail for cannabis possession.”

Others were less sympathetic to this argument, with Ed Newton-Rex (whose nonprofit Fairly Trained certifies AI training practices that respect creators’ rights) describing the Dorsey-Musk exchange as “Tech execs declaring all-out war on creators who don’t want their life’s work pillaged for profit.”

And the writer Lincoln Michel wrote that “none of Jack or Elon’s companies would exist without IP law,” adding, “They just hate artists.”

Dorsey elaborated on his stance in subsequent replies, writing that there are “much greater models to pay creators” while claiming “the current ones take way too much from them and only rent-seek.”

He made a similar point when attorney (and former Robert F. Kennedy Jr. running mate) Nicole Shanahan pushed back with an all caps “NO.”

“IP law is the only thing separating human creations from AI creations,” Shanahan said. “If you want to reform it, let’s talk!”

Dorsey countered, “creativity is what currently separates us, and the current system is limiting that, and putting the payments disbursement into the hands of gatekeepers who aren’t paying out fairly.”

Musk’s reply is at least consistent with statements he’s made in the past, for example telling Jay Leno that “patents are for the weak.”

A decade ago, in a so-called “patent giveaway,” he pledged that Tesla would not enforce patents against other companies that used them “in good faith.” (The company subsequently sued Australia’s Cap-XX over patents, but it said that was a response to a lawsuit Cap-XX filed against a Tesla subsidiary.)

And Dorsey, of course, initiated the open social media project that eventually became Bluesky, though he seemed to become disillusioned and eventually left Bluesky’s board. (Bluesky CEO Jay Graber recently said Dorsey’s departure “freed up” the company from seeming like a billionaire’s side project.) 

It’s also worth noting that the line between a random conversation on Twitter/X and actual government policy is thinner than it used to be, with Musk joining the Trump administration and pushing mass layoffs through his Department of Government Efficiency — named after a meme and largely staffed from the tech world.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Jack Dorsey Elon Musk 知识产权 AI 版权
相关文章