Elad Blog 04月09日 02:32
Market Ending Moves
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了初创公司如何通过关键策略在市场中取得决定性胜利,即“终结市场”的行动。文章分析了几种关键策略,包括与主要竞争对手合并、收购关键供应商、达成重要的分销协议、摧毁竞争对手的现金牛业务以及通过巨额融资来获得市场优势。这些策略旨在帮助初创公司在竞争激烈的市场中脱颖而出,赢得市场主导地位。文章强调了在制定这些策略时,需要具备创造性思维,并考虑各种可能的情况,即使最终未能实现,也能激发对并购、合作和关键人才招聘的深入思考。

🤝 **合并与收购:** 通过与主要竞争对手合并,消除定价压力,减少买家选择。例如,X.com与Paypal的合并,以及Uber在某些国际市场与主要竞争对手的合并,都旨在增强市场影响力。

🏭 **关键供应商:** 收购关键供应商,如拥有独特数据或定制组件的供应商,以限制竞争对手的资源获取,优先满足自身需求,并获取成本优势。

🤝 **分销协议:** 通过关键分销协议,例如IBM分销微软的早期操作系统,或雅虎分销谷歌,可以在行业中发挥关键作用,奠定市场地位。

💰 **现金牛:** 摧毁竞争对手的现金牛业务,例如通过提供免费或廉价的替代方案,或者改变商业模式来削弱其现金流。这在某些情况下可能非常有效,例如谷歌在搜索/广告领域面临的潜在竞争。

💸 **融资:** 通过巨额融资来获取分销渠道或占领网络效应市场。例如,TikTok早期的大规模流量购买,以及谷歌在早期搜索分销上的巨额投资,都是利用资金优势的例子。

Every once and a while, there is a move that end questions and competition for startups in a market. A single move can effectively win the market, or “end the market”.

Market ending moves may include:

    Merging with your main competitor to remove pricing pressure and options from buyers. The merger between X.com and Paypal in the 1990s consolidated the main payment providers on the internet at the time. Uber and Lyft are rumored to have almost merged at the height of their competition in the 2010s. The rumor is Uber walked from this deal, but then went on to merge its subsidiaries with the major player in multiple international markets to increase leverage of the combined player in the market (China, Russia, etc). Private to private mergers, when companies are still young, are much easier to get past regulators than public/private buys. There are other dynamics to contend with however around ownership, leadership, and ego[1]

    Buying a key supplier (of unique data, a bespoke sensor or component, etc) to starve others of a key input to products, prioritize yourself for volume, or get a cost advantage

    Key distribution deal. IBM distributing Microsoft’s early O/S, or Yahoo! distributing Google were two “king making” moves in an industry.

    Destroy a competitors cash cow. Sometimes your incumbent competitor will have a legacy cash cow business the funds everything else. Offering a free or cheap version of this, or changing business models to destroy their cash flow can be quite effective. This is part of the concern for Google in search/ads relative to some genAI products[2].

    Capital. Sometimes you can raise an enormous sum to buy distribution or saturate a network effect market. Tiktok notoriously bought traffic early on at large scale, and Google invested billions in early search distribution. One could argue the current SOTA LLM models are reasonably locked into an oligopoly market due to ability to raise billions or tends of billions of dollars for the next giant model.

    Other moves. Lots of other things can be done as well.

When you are thinking about market ending moves, be creative! You can brainstorm literally any scenario. Can you convince a large public company to spin out a key subsidiary to merge with you? Can you put aside ego with your main competitor to combine forces and stop competing for everything? Think broadly. Even if doesn’t happen, this often sparks key thinking on M&A, partnerships, and key hires that you may not have considered otherwise.

Notes

[1] Private to private mergers are notoriously hard between fierce competitors. Usually three topics come up - (a) relative ownership post merger, and (b) who is in charge (c) hard feelings between founders if one felt the other copied them, trash talked them, or the like.

[2] I think Google is most likely to transition just fine (ie survivable vs existential), but many worry this will be an issue

OTHER POSTS

My book: High Growth Handbook. Amazon. Online.

Markets:

Firesides & Podcasts

Startup life

Co-Founders

Raising Money

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

初创公司 市场策略 竞争分析 并购 融资
相关文章