TechCrunch News 04月07日 22:42
UK’s demand for Apple backdoor should not be heard in secret, says court
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

英国政府试图对涉及苹果公司的监控令细节保密,但最终未能如愿。根据英国调查权力法庭的最新裁决,案件的部分细节将被公开,尽管英国政府对此表示反对。该案件涉及英国政府要求苹果公司允许其访问全球任何苹果用户的加密云数据。此裁决标志着该案件首次被公开承认,此前《华盛顿邮报》曾披露相关细节。苹果公司随后停止向英国用户提供高级数据保护功能。隐私倡导者、新闻机构、美国两党议员和情报官员都呼吁公开听证会。

🔑英国调查权力法庭裁定,英国政府试图对苹果公司提出的监控令细节保密的要求被驳回,这意味着案件的部分细节将被公开。

📜该案件的核心涉及英国政府要求苹果公司允许其访问全球任何苹果用户的加密云数据。这一要求引发了对用户隐私的担忧。

🚫苹果公司此前停止向英国用户提供高级数据保护功能,该功能允许用户对其在苹果云中的文件进行加密,以防止未经授权的访问。

📢包括隐私倡导者、新闻机构、美国两党议员和情报官员在内的各方都呼吁公开听证会,以提高透明度。

The U.K. government has lost its bid to keep secret the details of a surveillance order it brought against Apple, according to a newly released decision by the U.K. surveillance powers’ court.

The decision, posted on Monday by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in London, means that parts of the legal case will be held in public, despite objections from the U.K. government.

In its ruling on Monday, the tribunal’s judges said they “do not accept that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security.” This is the first public acknowledgement that the case exists, though specific details of the case were withheld.

Much of the “bare details” of the case reportedly relate to a U.K. legal demand ordering Apple to let U.K. authorities access the encrypted cloud data of any Apple customer anywhere in the world.

The Washington Post in February published leaked details of the legal demand, revealing the existence of the U.K.’s backdoor demand. Soon after, Apple said it could “no longer” offer Advanced Data Protection, which allows customers to encrypt their files in Apple’s cloud so that nobody other than the user can access them, to users in the United Kingdom.

Neither Apple nor the Home Office, which initiated the demand on behalf of the U.K. government, have so far commented on the specific legal case as it remains subject to U.K. national security rules, preventing even the existence of the case itself.

Following the order, Apple reportedly appealed the order to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. The U.K. government responded by telling the court that national security would suffer if the nature of the case were made public.

Privacy and rights advocates, a coalition of news outlets, a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers, and senior intelligence officials in the Trump administration have all called for transparency around the legal hearings.

When contacted by TechCrunch, a spokesperson for the U.K. Home Office did not comment. A spokesperson for Apple did not immediately return a request for comment.

Apple previously told TechCrunch that the company has “never built a backdoor or master key” to any of its products or services and it “never will.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

苹果 监控 隐私 英国
相关文章