A Geodyssey – Enterprise Search Discovery, Text Mining, Machine Learning 04月06日 18:57
Concerns remain over potential for censorship and lack of openness in Deep-time Digital Earth (DDE)’s GeoGPT Application Promotion
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章关注Deep-time Digital Earth(DDE)的GeoGPT在审查、开放性和伦理方面的问题。该AI由浙江实验室和DDE以国际地质科学联合会(IUGS)的名义向国际社会推广。文章指出,GeoGPT的使用条款包含禁止提问可能“损害中国形象”的条款,引发了对审查和言论自由的担忧。此外,尽管承诺开放,但实际仅披露训练来源,而非完整训练数据。文章还质疑了该AI对用户数据的潜在使用以及相关的伦理问题。

🧐 GeoGPT的使用条款中包含禁止用户提问可能“损害中国形象”的条款,即使该AI托管在新加坡的服务器上,也引发了对审查和言论自由的担忧。

💡 尽管GeoGPT被宣传为“开放科学”和“开源”,但DDE仅承诺公开训练来源(出版商和期刊列表),而非实际的训练数据,这使得用户无法评估可能存在的科学偏见。

🤔 GeoGPT的软件代码、知识图谱、用于检索增强生成(RAG)的数据库,以及用于LLM训练的10万个地质问答对均未公开,这使得GeoGPT无法被复现,违背了科学完整性的基本原则。

⚠️ GeoGPT的条款赋予了所有者使用用户上传数据的权利,文章质疑了这种免费提供AI能力,换取用户数据,并由IUGS支持的DDE推广的伦理问题。

Screenshot

Serious concerns remain over potential for censorship, lack of openness and ethics with Deep-time Digital Earth’s GeoGPT. This Artificial Intelligence (AI) is promoted to the international community by Zhejiang Lab and DDE, in the name of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS).

Article published in the ‘Geoscientist’ in response to ‘GeoGPT: An Update’ by Ludden and colleagues from Deep-time Digital Earth (DDE) and Zhejiang Lab. Quoting from the article:

“The creation of a separate international-facing version of the GeoGPT application on servers in Singapore is a positive step. However, the Terms and Conditions for its use still contain clauses prohibiting geoscientists from asking questions that may “tarnish the image of the [Chinese] state” (GeoGPT, 2025). Such a clause seems out of place for AI hosted outside the legal jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and has the potential for censorship and the erosion of freedom of speech, particularly for the international community researching social geoscience topics.”

“GeoGPT is promoted as ‘open science’ and ‘open source’ and, following calls from geological societies worldwide, DDE committed to openly releasing their training data (Hawkins, 2024). Yet, it now appears that DDE will disclose only the training sources (publisher and journal list) rather than the actual training data (GeoGPT, 2025). It seems that none of the user-facing software code, the underlying knowledge graph (GeoKG), the databases used for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), nor the 100,000 geological question-answer pairs used for LLM training are openly available (GeoGPT, 2025). Without transparency at the individual article level, users cannot assess what geoscientific biases may exist. Ultimately, GeoGPT is not reproducible. Without this cornerstone of scientific integrity, GeoGPT should not be marketed as open science or open source.”

“As is common for online-hosted AI tools, GeoGPT appears to have Terms and Conditions that give the proprietor legal rights to use data uploaded by users for the proprietor’s own purposes. I question the ethics of offering free AI capabilities, particularly to geoscientists in the Global South, in exchange for rights to their data, promoted by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS)-endorsed DDE.”

Link for the full article with references, published in the Geoscientist, and the article to which it responded.

https://geoscientist.online/sections/viewpoint/letters/geogpt-concerns-remain/

hashtag#geology hashtag#geosciences hashtag#earthsciences hashtag#largelanguagemodels hashtag#artificialintelligence hashtag#ai hashtag#geoethics hashtag#aiethics hashtag#bigdata

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

GeoGPT 审查 开放性 伦理 AI
相关文章