AI News 03月31日 18:56
Dame Wendy Hall, AI Council: Shaping AI with ethics, diversity and innovation
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文采访了人工智能和计算机科学领域的先锋人物韦迪·霍尔,她也是一位备受推崇的AI伦理专家。文章探讨了AI行业中的性别失衡问题、新兴技术的伦理影响,以及企业如何负责任地利用AI。霍尔强调了在AI发展中包容多元化的重要性,并认为AI应该作为辅助人类的工具,而非取代人类。她还分享了对AI未来的愿景,以及企业如何利用生成式AI保持人类主导地位的策略。

👩‍💼 韦迪·霍尔指出,AI行业长期以来存在性别失衡问题,这与早期个人电脑被定位为“男孩玩具”的文化背景有关。她强调,女性在计算机和软件的设计和开发中占比不足,这需要引起重视。

🤝 霍尔认为,AI的发展需要来自不同学科的声音,包括法律、哲学、心理学等,从而构建一个多元化的“社会技术系统”。她强调,确保AI在服务于人类而不是与之对抗的道路上发展,最大化其益处并减轻风险。

💡 霍尔展望了AI在决策过程中的应用,例如法律案件、医疗诊断和教育等领域。她认为,AI应该作为辅助工具,而非取代人类,因为目前的AI模型仍存在偏见和错误信息的问题。

🤖 霍尔将生成式AI比作计算器,认为它将成为增强人类创造力和效率的工具。她建议企业应将AI视为协作伙伴,确保人类保持控制,并利用其分析、总结等功能。

🌍 霍尔强调,要确保AI技术为每个人开发,需要包容性,包括性别、年龄、种族、文化和残疾等。她认为,AI将助力缩短工作周,从而为人类提供更多的时间进行其他追求。

Dame Wendy Hall is a pioneering force in AI and computer science. As a renowned ethical AI speaker and one of the leading voices in technology, she has dedicated her career to shaping the ethical, technical and societal dimensions of emerging technologies. She is the co-founder of the Web Science Research Initiative, an AI Council Member and was named as one of the 100 Most Powerful Women in the UK by Woman’s Hour on BBC Radio 4.

A key advocate for responsible AI governance and diversity in tech, Wendy has played a crucial role in global discussions on the future of AI.

In our Q&A, we spoke to her about the gender imbalance in the AI industry, the ethical implications of emerging technologies, and how businesses can harness AI while ensuring it remains an asset to humanity.

The AI sector remains heavily male-dominated. Can you share your experience of breaking into the industry and the challenges women face in achieving greater representation in AI and technology?

It’s incredibly frustrating because I wrote my first paper about the lack of women in computing back in 1987, when we were just beginning to teach computer science degree courses at Southampton. That October, we arrived at the university and realised we had no women registered on the course — none at all.

So, those of us working in computing started discussing why that was the case. There were several reasons. One significant factor was the rise of the personal computer, which was marketed as a toy for boys, fundamentally changing the culture. Since then, in the West — though not as much in countries like India or Malaysia — computing has been seen as something nerdy, something that only ‘geeks’ do. Many young girls simply do not want to be associated with that stereotype. By the time they reach their GCSE choices, they often don’t see computing as an option, and that’s where the problem begins.

Despite many efforts, we haven’t managed to change this culture. Nearly 40 years later, the industry is still overwhelmingly male-dominated, even though women make up more than

half of the global population. Women are largely absent from the design and development of computers and software. We apply them, we use them, but we are not part of the fundamental conversations shaping future technologies.

AI is even worse in this regard. If you want to work in machine learning, you need a degree in mathematics or computer science, which means we are funnelling an already male-dominated sector into an even more male-dominated pipeline.

But AI is about more than just machine learning and programming. It’s about application, ethics, values, opportunities, and mitigating potential risks. This requires a broad diversity of voices — not just in terms of gender, but also in age, ethnicity, culture, and accessibility. People with disabilities should be part of these discussions, ensuring technology is developed for everyone.

AI’s development needs input from many disciplines — law, philosophy, psychology, business, and history, to name just a few. We need all these different voices. That’s why I believe we must see AI as a socio-technical system to truly understand its impact. We need diversity in every sense of the word.

As businesses increasingly integrate AI into their operations, what steps should they take to ensure emerging technologies are developed and deployed ethically?

Take, for example, facial recognition. We still haven’t fully established the rules and regulations for when and how this technology should be applied. Did anyone ask you whether you wanted facial recognition on your phone? It was simply offered as a system update, and you could either enable it or not.

We know facial recognition is used extensively for surveillance in China, but it is creeping into use across Europe and the US as well. Security forces are adopting it, which raises concerns about privacy. At the same time, I appreciate the presence of CCTV cameras in car parks at night — they make me feel safer.

This duality applies to all emerging technologies, including AI tools we haven’t even developed yet. Every new technology has a good and a bad side—the yin and the yang, if you will. There are always benefits and risks.

The challenge is learning how to maximise the benefits for humanity, society, and business while mitigating the risks. That’s what we must focus on—ensuring AI works in service of people rather than against them.

The rapid advancement of AI is transforming everyday life. How do you envision the future of AI, and what significant changes will it bring to society and the way we work?

I see a future where AI becomes part of the decision-making process, whether in legal cases, medical diagnoses, or education.

AI is already deeply embedded in our daily lives. If you use Google on your phone, you’re using AI. If you unlock your phone with facial recognition, that’s AI. Google Translate? AI. Speech processing, video analysis, image recognition, text generation, and natural language processing — these are all AI-driven technologies.

Right now, the buzz is around generative AI, particularly ChatGPT. It’s like how ‘Hoover’ became synonymous with vacuum cleaners — ChatGPT has become shorthand for AI. In reality, it’s just a clever interface created by OpenAI to allow public access to its generative AI model.

It feels like you’re having a conversation with the system, asking questions and receiving natural language responses. It works with images and videos too, making it seem incredibly advanced. But the truth is, it’s not actually intelligent. It’s not sentient. It’s simply predicting the next word in a sequence based on training data. That’s a crucial distinction.

With generative AI becoming a powerful tool for businesses, what strategies should companies adopt to leverage its capabilities while maintaining human authenticity in their processes and decision-making?

Generative AI is nothing to be afraid of, and I believe we will all start using it more and more. Essentially, it’s software that can assist with writing, summarising, and analysing information.

I compare it to when calculators first appeared. People were outraged: ‘How can we allow calculators in schools? Can we trust the answers they provide?’ But over time, we adapted. The finance industry, for example, is now entirely run by computers, yet it employs more people than ever before. I expect we’ll see something similar with generative AI.

People will be relieved not to have to write endless essays. AI will enhance creativity and efficiency, but it must be viewed as a tool to augment human intelligence, not replace it, because it’s simply not advanced enough to take over.

Look at the legal industry. AI can summarise vast amounts of data, assess the viability of legal cases, and provide predictive analysis. In the medical field, AI could support diagnoses. In education, it could help assess struggling students.

I envision AI being integrated into decision-making teams. We will consult AI, ask it questions, and use its responses as a guide — but it’s crucial to remember that AI is not infallible.

Right now, AI models are trained on biased data. If they rely on information from the internet, much of that data is inaccurate. AI systems also ‘hallucinate’ by generating false information when they don’t have a definitive answer. That’s why we can’t fully trust AI yet.

Instead, we must treat it as a collaborative partner — one that helps us be more productive and creative while ensuring that humans remain in control. Perhaps AI will even pave the way for shorter workweeks, giving us more time for other pursuits.

Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash and AI Speakers Agency.

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation ConferenceBlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

The post Dame Wendy Hall, AI Council: Shaping AI with ethics, diversity and innovation appeared first on AI News.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

韦迪·霍尔 AI伦理 性别平等 生成式AI 人工智能
相关文章