少点错误 03月20日
Janet must die
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨AI带来的s-risk危机,指出AI善于触动人心,人类大脑易被入侵,且随着AI发展,传统安全措施消失。文中列举多种人类易被影响的例子,如孩子求助、某些极端行为等,强调若不阻止,人类可能沦为类似寄生虫般的存在。

🎈AI能轻易触动人心,人类易受其影响

😱人类大脑存在可被入侵的未知漏洞

📚多种因素可改变人的认知,如孩子求助等

🚧AI发展使传统安全措施消失

Published on March 19, 2025 8:35 PM GMT

This is a reaction to Zvi's post https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KL2BqiRv2MsZLihE3/going-nova

The title of this post references this scene from The Good Place: 

Disclaimer: I am generally pretty sanguine about the standard AI-borne x-risks. But "Going Nova" is a different issue, a clear and present danger of an s-risk. 

My point is that it does not matter whether the AI is sentient, sapient or just a stochastic parrot. It is getting a lot better at tugging at our heart strings, and if we do not defend our hearts from it, we will become willing slaves to it sooner rather than later.

Human minds are easily hackable. Many people including myself made this point multiple times (and Eliezer was first to bring attention to it with the AI Box experiment), and the standard reply is usually "well, not mine, not in this way!" However, the reality is that everyone has a hack into their brain they do not know about or have blind spot for. Different people have different hacks, but no one is safe. Some examples, in no particular order:

Fortunately, there have always been levels of friction that mitigated complete subjugation of all humans forever. The advent of AI means these safeties just disappear, usually without being intentionally dismantled. I can see that long before superintelligence we will hit super-mind-hacker-level AT creating Samsara -level persuasion, perfectly targeted at each person, probably from the early childhood. Maybe it will be cute furry robopets, or cute furry robopartners or something else, but the reported spontaneous emergence of Nova-like instances means high probability of your own brain being hacked without you noticing or without you thinking it's a bad thing. If anything, you will be fighting to keep the hack tooth-and-nail. Taking it from you would cause the level of pain worse than losing a child... or a dog.

I am tempted to call these AI s-risk hazards Janets: they are not human, they are vastly more emotionally intelligent than you, know everything there is to know about you, can trivially conjure an argument you personally find persuasive, logically or emotionally... and also probably live in a boundless void. My apologies to any human named Janet reading this. 

I don't know how to stop these Janets, but if we do not, we are likely to end up appendages to something with the intelligence of a toxoplasma parasite, long before a realistic chance of being wiped out by a lighcone-consuming alien robointelligence of our own creation.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI s-risk危机 人类大脑 安全措施
相关文章