少点错误 03月06日
Which meat to eat: CO₂ vs Animal suffering
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了在动物农业背景下,如何选择对环境影响最小、动物福利最高的食物。文章对比了不同肉类在二氧化碳排放和动物痛苦方面的表现,揭示了大型动物肉类排放较高,而小型动物肉类则导致更多动物遭受痛苦。对于不愿选择纯素饮食的人来说,这是一个两难选择。文章建议,如果只关心环境,应避免牛肉;如果只关心动物福利,应避免养殖鱼类和鸡肉。最终,文章呼吁人们关注工厂化养殖中动物遭受的巨大痛苦,并考虑减少食用小型动物。

🐄二氧化碳排放量:大型动物如牛的肉类生产会产生更高的二氧化碳排放量。数据显示,牛肉(肉牛群)每公斤产生99.48公斤二氧化碳当量,而羊肉和绵羊肉则为39.72公斤。

🐥动物痛苦程度:小型动物如鸡的肉类生产会导致更多的动物痛苦。数据显示,养殖鲶鱼每公斤产生290天的痛苦,笼养鸡蛋为42天,鸡肉为27天。

⚖️权衡与选择:在牛肉和鸡肉之间进行选择时,实际上是在89公斤二氧化碳排放当量(牛肉)和26天折磨(鸡肉)之间进行选择。文章建议,应优先考虑减少动物痛苦,特别是避免食用养殖鱼类和鸡肉。

Published on March 6, 2025 12:37 PM GMT

Animal agriculture generates an ungodly amount of animal suffering and greenhouse gas emissions. Ideally, everyone would adopt a vegan diet1, but since this appears to be too much to ask for most people, the next question becomes: which food is the least bad?

Here we run into an uncomfortable observation. Meat from larger animals tends to produce more CO₂, while meat from smaller animals tends to cause more animal suffering.
This makes intuitive sense: when converting animals into a set mass of meat, more individual animals must suffer if they are smaller. We can see this in the data, e.g., we slaughter 309 million cows per year, while the number of chickens slaughtered exceeds 75 Billion per year.

Let’s start ranking

Let's start by comparing greenhouse gas emissions. Which foods have the lowest CO₂ impact?
Here’s how many kilograms of CO₂-equivalized emissions are produced per kilogram of food (some create methane etc, but that’s accounted for by converting it into the same unit), ranked from worst to best:

Beef (beef herd)     99.48 kg
Lamb & Mutton    39.72 kg
Beef (dairy herd)   33.3 kg
Prawns (farmed)   26.87 kg
Cheese                       23.88 kg
Fish (farmed)          13.63 kg
Pig Meat                   12.31 kg
Poultry Meat           9.87 kg
Eggs                             4.67 kg
Rice                              4.45 kg
Tofu                             3.16 kg
Milk                             3.15 kg
Soy milk                     0.98 kg

As we can see, larger animals tend to create more CO₂.

Can we create a similar ranking for animal suffering? Yes we can, if we take the sentience figures from this report and apply it to the production process used to create the meat. Here’s the equivalized days of suffering per kg of food (some have bigger brains etc, but that’s accounted for by converting it into the same unit), ranked from worst to best:

Farmed catfish        290 d
Battery cage eggs   42 d
Farmed salmon       27 d
Chicken                      27 d
Turkey                         15 d
Pork                              3.9 d
Beef                              0.8 d
Milk                              0.049 d
Tofu                              0 d
Soy milk                      0 d

As we can see, the smaller animals tend to produce more suffering. The best products on these lists, both in terms of animal suffering and CO₂, are tofu and soy milk.
For those who don't want to go vegan, milk is still comparatively good in terms of both CO₂ and animal suffering, so you might want to go vegetarian then. But for those who want to keep eating meat, we have a dilemma between CO₂ and animal suffering. Compare beef and chicken again. Beef has ten times the CO₂ impact of chicken meat, but chicken meat has 34 times higher impact on suffering than beef.2

Now, don’t take these exact numbers as gospel. We’re still in the process of researching this so I expect the exact numbers to change over time. If you want to use different numbers you can play with the calculations using this interactive chart.3 The important thing is not the exact numbers but rather the orders of magnitude; which clearly point in the direction of meat production with smaller animals creating more suffering.
 

What to pick

Farmed fish is terrible in terms of animal welfare and pretty bad in terms of CO₂, so best avoid that. Beef is terrible in terms of CO₂, but comparatively good in terms of animal suffering (the word "comparative" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there). So if you don't care about animals but do care about CO₂, beef is the most important one to avoid. For those who only care about animals, farmed fish and chickens are the most important to avoid.

For those of you who are having trouble weighing the two against one another, consider this: When choosing between, e.g, chicken and beef, you're effectively choosing between creating the equivalent of 89 kg more CO₂ (with beef) or the equivalent of 26 days more torture (with chicken). To put this into context, a campfire produces about 10 kg of CO₂. Would you rather make 9 campfires or start torturing for 26 days?4 Are people who have a hearth morally equivalent to people who torture every day? Or what about a candle? It produces 0,01 kg of CO₂. Is lighting a candle worse than torturing an animal for a couple minutes? I would say: no, clearly not. The enormous quantity of suffering created in factory farms easily trumps the quantity of CO₂ that it creates.
We hear a lot about climate change in the news and online, while animal suffering gets little attention. But the scale of suffering that is produced in factory farms is unimaginably large. Please consider eating fewer small animals.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

动物农业 二氧化碳排放 动物福利 肉类选择 环境伦理
相关文章