TechCrunch News 02月25日
Holmes and Balwani’s appeal falls flat as court upholds fraud convictions
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

伊丽莎白·霍姆斯和拉梅什·“桑尼”·巴尔瓦尼的上诉被加州北区法院驳回,其试图推翻欺诈定罪并减轻刑期,法院也拒绝减轻4.52亿美元的共同赔偿令。两人因欺诈投资者被判入狱,2023年开始服刑。他们在上诉中提出多种理由,但均被法院驳回。

🏥霍姆斯是Theranos创始人,巴尔瓦尼是前COO,2022年分别被判有罪

📜两人上诉称法院允许不当证词,上诉小组认为错误无害

💼霍姆斯对一些证据提出异议,法院认为相关,上诉被驳回

❌巴尔瓦尼的多项上诉理由也被法院一一驳回

Elizabeth Holmes and Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani’s appeals to overturn their fraud convictions and reduce their prison sentences were denied Monday by the Northern District Court of California, which also refused to soften their $452 million joint restitution order.

Holmes, the founder of Theranos, and Balwani, its former COO, were convicted in separate trials in 2022 for defrauding investors about the capabilities of Theranos’s blood-testing technology. Holmes was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison, and Balwani received nearly 13 years. Both began serving their sentences in 2023.

In their appeal, the two argued that the district court allowed improper testimony from former Theranos employees who served as lay witnesses but wound up offering improper expert testimony without the necessary legal designation. The appeals panel agreed that some testimony crossed into expert territory but concluded the errors were harmless.

Holmes also contested the inclusion of a damning government report that highlighted failures in Theranos’s lab, arguing it unfairly influenced the jury. But the court found the report relevant in establishing her knowledge and intent. Holmes argued that her rights were violated when she was prohibited from cross-examining a former Theranos laboratory director regarding aspects of his post-Theranos employment. Again, the appellate panel disagreed, saying the court didn’t “abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of the cross-examination.”

Meanwhile, Balwani claimed his charges were improperly expanded during the trial (the panel dismissed this argument pretty forcefully). He also argued that his right to a fair trial was violated because the government didn’t correct what he said was false testimony from two investors. The court rejected that argument, too, saying even if there were issues, they wouldn’t have affected the outcome of the case.

Balwani is serving out his sentence at the grimly named Terminal Island, a minimum-security federal facility just outside of Los Angeles; Holmes is serving hers at Camp Bryan, a minimum security federal prison camp that’s approximately 100 miles from Houston.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

伊丽莎白·霍姆斯 巴尔瓦尼 欺诈定罪 上诉被驳回
相关文章